Notice you only focus on "gun rights" & it's much broader than just guns. Anyhow, nothing is limiting 2nd Amendment rights, because that's not possible with laws (i.e. they're unconstitutional); in other words, it would have to be repealed in order for there to be limitations. What is happening now is that our 2nd Amendment rights are being infringed by any laws that impose any sort of restriction, ban, or mandate pertaining to keeping and bearing arms. Even taxes on the purchase, sale, rent, lease, possession, storage, or use of arms would be unconstitutional, for the same reason poll taxes are unconstitutional.
Well if we are going to be so hard line on the amendment then we had better make sure citizens are part of militias for these rights to be enforced. The dilemma is that the militia part of the 2nd amednment is ignored, completely. The 2nd amendment is only one sentence, so how does that half get ignored, and the right to own and bear arms get inflated to a broad absolute? What would January 6, 2021 have been different if those Trump supporters been armed with machine guns? The Capitol poilce and congress was lucky there were laws in DC that limited guns. Fortunately most of those rioters followed that law. How many police would have died if the law was ignored?
To my mind the interpretation was compromised, and so was the type of weapons compromized. If an 18 year old kid wants a machine gun and it's allowed due to an uncompromized interpretation of the 2nd amendment, he'd better be part of an official state militia that is well regulated. As we all know, state militias were replaced by national guard units.
We have problems with gun violence & mass shootings because all of these unconstitutional laws that infringe on 2nd Amendment rights effectively render society unarmed sitting ducks, and ironically the criminals ignoring such unconstitutional gun grabber laws and using them to their advantage are the ones preserving their 2nd Amendment rights for themselves, but using it to commit crimes and wreak havoc.
Oh my, as if mass killers are so mentally sound that they worry about being killed if they attack children in a school, or people sitting in church? This heavily armed society is insanity. It is vastly more sane to screen people if they want guns, and limit the risk that mentally unstable people will open fire at your picnic. How fast can you get your gun if you are the first to get hit by a .223? Are you going to have your gun in hand every time you are out in public, just in case? Don't want to be caught off guard do you? It's not like mass shooters annouce where and when they will open fire. Maybe you will be at the grocery store minding your own business and you become face to face with a guy who pulls out a gun and aims it at you. Oh dang. Do you ask him to give you 30 seconds so you can pull your gun and have a fair gunfight?
A few years ago I was at a grocery store and I heard a disturbance. It was none of my business but there was a lady with her two kids running my way. Something was up. It turned out some guy had walked in with an AR15. The cops got called. The manager and secuirty asked him to leave. They guy said he was defending his 2nd amendment rights and wasn't a threat. Well there were a lot of people in that store that didn't know anything about this guy. Some people left their carts and ran from the store. I didn't see all this close up, I paid for my items and left. I read about it later on Facebook.
OK, the guy wasn't a threat and didn't shoot anyone. But no one wanted to trust a guy walking into a store with an AR15 given the risk. No one wants to get a bullet in the face because they assumed he was just a guy defending his 2nd amendment rights, and not a disgrunted employee out for revenge. Stores started banning people with guns because just the threat of not knowing is disruptive and unfair to shoppers.
I remember than mom with her kids. Is having access to a gun more important than her feeling safe getting groceries? Should moms worry about taking their kids anywhere in public because there are people walking around with guns? This is how idealism fails.
BTW Do you only care about gun violence? All other forms of violence are no big deal, to you? As long as it's not violence that involved a gun, in your book it's ok?
Look at you deflecting from gun violence. Humans are not perfect beings. Many humans have low emotional intelliegnce and stuggle to manage their emotions. Look at road rage. Look at domestic volence. What I prefer is more mental healthcare access. But as we know the cost of living keeps going up, and insurance companies have cut mental health benefits. This is why medication is being used more, and those who lack resources often end up commiting crimes and end up in prison. This is why libertarians overestimate their ideals, as if all humans will become wise, responsible, and accountable if we eliminate laws. No, that has never worked in any civilization ever in human history. Even many wild west towns banned guns in city limits. Why? Because the good people did not want to be killed by the stupid and undisciplined. It's called law and order for a reason.
Global not local is bandwagon fallacy - the US doesn't have to have a private central bank system that issues interest-bearing money loaned into existence, like the rest of the world. I don't know that Biden was able to slow inflation - that's begging the question fallacy. I'm only interested in actual inflation negatively affecting the average American buying groceries, fuel, paying rent, etc., not whatever political propaganda statistics you seem to be referring to.
Sorry, inflation is global. That's not to say there aren't local issue, like a bad crop affecting prices, but that's why there are futures markets on certain commodities. For example Biden sold a lot of oil that the USA had in reserves back in 2022, and it helped stabilize the price of oil on the gloabl market. He sold it at $97 a barrel. After the price of oil dropped he bought back oil for the reserves at $67 a barrel. That was a profit of over $500 billion for the USA. This illustrates how inflation can be managed at a global level. But corporations these days are global. They sell to all markets at prices they can get and maximize profits.