• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Life Without God leads to an Existential Crisis?

David T

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Living a life without a belief in God is known to cause an existential crisis within most atheists. Imran Hussein explains why by referencing an ayah (verse) from the Qur'an. The Ayah in question is from Surah Ta'ha, 20:124 "And whoever turns away from My remembrance - indeed, he will have a depressed life, and We will gather him on the Day of Resurrection blind." - Dawah Digital blurb for the following video:


This video got me thinking. How do atheists deal with their existential crisis? Your thoughts are welcome!

peace
" Belief, non belief, agnosticism, are lame excuses made by grown ups for inexcusably understanding far less than when they were small children."

All three love each other so much and can't possibly imagine anyone not like them!!! Sorry I am none of the above. All three are going extinct.
 

Rational Agnostic

Well-Known Member
Living a life without a belief in God is known to cause an existential crisis within most atheists. Imran Hussein explains why by referencing an ayah (verse) from the Qur'an. The Ayah in question is from Surah Ta'ha, 20:124 "And whoever turns away from My remembrance - indeed, he will have a depressed life, and We will gather him on the Day of Resurrection blind." - Dawah Digital blurb for the following video:


This video got me thinking. How do atheists deal with their existential crisis? Your thoughts are welcome!

peace

Believing in something because it gives you comfort or prevents an "existential crisis" is NOT a valid reason to believe it, nor do your subjective feelings have any bearing on objective reality.
 

Aldrnari

Active Member
Hmmm... I may not be an atheist (yet), but I do not follow any gods (which I am growing doubtful of their existence more every day). Honestly, the only spiritual problems I've faced was when I was a Christian. Things in the Bible such as the Mosaic law, Jephthah vs. Abraham, and the way slavery was handled were troubling to me. I ignored the things I didn't like, and cherry picked the things i did like more and more until I couldn't justify practicing my faith any longer.

Now, I feel free to look and learn what I like without fear of offending god (at least, the Christian god). I've read the Bible (the NIV, and I'd like to read king James next), the Zend Avesta, and the Poetic Eddas (I'd like to read the Prose Eddas next). I'd like to read the Quran, and the Vedas as well. I'd maybe even like to read Bhuddist and Sikhi texts (which I am extremely ignorant of) some day. I can practice yoga without fear that I'm summoning demons or other things such as that, so shedding superstitions has it's benefits.

Instead of feeling without direction or purpose, though, I've grown to appreciate people, cultures, nature, and life more (it seems much more precious since I don't know what will come after death). I've discovered a love of anthropology, and in broadening my scientific knowledge (which is more lacking than I'd like, for sure). Every new thing I learn feeds my growing curiosity, and everything I thought that I knew was right and turns out to be wrong is an exciting opportunity to learn something else new.

That isn't to say that religions have no value for me, though. They are interesting living slices of history, and have valuable insights into the human psyche.

I don't feel empty without a god in my life right now, but I'm also not ready to say just yet that there isn't one... I'm just not convinced yet that any aren't just dreamed up by man, since they all have such human characteristics (except, maybe, a deistic god). That said, I don't feel that I've given god theories/beliefs enough of a chance yet, so we shall see!

TLDR: I don't know, and I'm fine with that. :D
 

Laika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Hi Laika,

first of all, let me thank you for volunteering to engage me here. Secondly, I hope you can beat your depression and find your center and enjoy life again. I suffered depression in my early to mid twenties and it was aweful. It wasn't solely down to an existential crisis, only partly. From my own subjective reflections, I can say that I have found that a belief in God served as an anchor for me for more than just the existential crisis itself, however, my own life experience is just one story. I hope you don't think I'm being nosey in asking you questions related to your current depression. But before I do, let me tell you why I am asking.

Not at all. RF is one of the few places I can be really open about my experiences with depression, so I'm more than happy to share. :)

I watched the video, and it shook me up somewhat. A trip down memory lane which I did not enjoy. And I wondered if this existential crisis was typical of atheists, judging by the members who have posted so far - I would say that it is not the norm for them to suffer such - I hope for their sake they were speaking the truth. Depression is truly an hard thing to live with. When I was an atheist, I felt an huge spiritual void in myself, and life was tasteless. Everything was nothing because it meant nothing in the end. Do I make sense? This was the world view I had adopted and being reminded of it was an uncomfortable experience, so much so that I made this thread to see if there were others who were experiencing the same as I had once.

Yeah, you make perfect sense.

I don't think an existential crisis is typical of all atheists. The responses you get in the thread will show that. However, I do think there is a particular type of atheism, closely associated with nihilism, that simply subtracts from religious belief until there is a great big "nothingness" left. Essentially its too rational to the point of being de-humanising and forgets that human beings have emotional and psychological needs for meaning. Religion can satisfy that, but as it is simply an emotional response to a set of beliefs- its possible that any number of beliefs could make you happy. It's not necessarily going to be one belief system or another. You can be happy as an atheist- but the more radical the atheism, the more complicated it will be. So I certainly agree with you that it is possible and I have definitely had something like that, but its not universal.

With genuine interest and empathy, I ask, is your depression borne of an existential crisis? or something else? or a combination of both - the existential crisis and something else? How long have you been suffering for? and how do you deal with it?

Though you are an atheist, I hope you are not offended by my good will in hoping God heals you soon. Amen.

peace

I'm not offended by that. If god is "up there" and wants to help out, he's very welcome to. :D

The original cause of depression was rooted probably in religion. I was gay/bisexual and I struggled to come out. I found that I had taken in a lot of ideas of sex as something that is negative and sinful and it dated back to childhood when I was in primary school. My primary school wasn't a religious school but had a Christian ethos, so we learnt bible stories and sang about Jesus. I don't know how the subject of sex came up but it was there. The early period of depression was largely coming out and becoming much more comfortable with my sexuality and over-turning bad ideas and habits coming out of cultural Christianity.

Later on however, yes, there definitely has been an existential crisis and a nihilism of sorts. The problem has been that without a belief in god, it has a domino effect on questioning everything else that is related to god. Questioning whether morality is really consistent with being a "materialist" has been a big problem because there isn't a set of easy answers available or (given that it could feature social darwinism) a set of answers I'd want to accept. The fact that there is no "cosmic" justice in the world and that the "good guys" don't always win is depressing.

As a Communist sympathiser, that has played out particularly in thinking about all the atrocities committed under Stalin, Mao and releasing that if you were in one of those places, you are unlikely to be able to do anything about it and the fear means you probably will go along with it. There is that really horrific moment when it hits you and you realise you probably would have killed people if you had been in the wrong place at the wrong time and it puts those kind of beliefs in a very difficult moral context, but one that is absolutely necessary to face up to. On the one hand its a set of beliefs you invested a great deal of time and effort in, and on the other you have to sort of grow up, take a step back and think really hard whether that is a good enough reason to unthinkingly parrot a party line (and no, it most definitely isn't but it takes time to accept it). Where it gets difficult is the feeling of guilt, shame and fear because you've always been taught "that's wrong", but it gets easier with time and you learn to forgive yourself for being only human. most people when faced with those problems would not do the "right thing" but the fact I have asked those questions and tried to take some responsibility is definitely more exceptional. So I can have a bit of pride in that. It is a rare individual who rebels against their peers as we are social animals and tend to conform even when we shouldn't.

Its a pretty dark area to think about, but the positive effect of it is that you can put everything in perspective and say "well, things aren't that bad". It gives you a standard of evil or pain to judge things by and most things are simply annoying or inconvenient rather than genuinely bad. Of course, if you've thought about this kind of stuff for a long time you are going to have a deeply unconventional way of approaching things and a certain lurking sense of horror is always kind of "there" hanging in the background and you just try to respect it.

The flip side of this has been that, if I am "just an animal", the depression is a conditioned response to external stimuli. Animals aren't naturally depressed and they aren't born depressed, so its something that is learned. The way I have coped with it is to be less rational and paying much more attention to how I feel. If I feel bad, there is a reason for it and its best not to ignore it. you wouldn't ignore physical pain, so you treat psychological pain the same way. That has created a sort of mental space to question how my beliefs contribute to it and there is usually some form of ignorance or absolutism that gives me a false confidence in pessimism than I can change. Most of the time there are things you can do that will make you happy and more fulfilled. They generally small, but the positive effect adds up.

I've had depression for nine years and when I think about the future, there is still a really deep abyss I can sink in to. I'm still dealing with that, but I think the depression isn't so much about whether the future is "bad" or not, but the sense that I have so little control over it. To give you a direct answer, without a god giving you a sort of divine protection to make sure things always turn out ok, yes, you do face an existential crisis because the meaning, purpose and significance of your own life is no longer self-evident. You have to regain a childhood sense of wonder and love of things because it is the only sane response to it. you can be too rational and have to accept that the animal and emotional side of you is capable of doing good and not be afraid of it as "sinful" or somehow less human. Listening the music helps a great deal because it gives you a meditative space to really know and express what you feel. It gets easier but you have to keep pushing forward.
 

Ingledsva

HEATHEN ALASKAN
Living a life without a belief in God is known to cause an existential crisis within most atheists. Imran Hussein explains why by referencing an ayah (verse) from the Qur'an. The Ayah in question is from Surah Ta'ha, 20:124 "And whoever turns away from My remembrance - indeed, he will have a depressed life, and We will gather him on the Day of Resurrection blind." - Dawah Digital blurb for the following video:

This video got me thinking. How do atheists deal with their existential crisis? Your thoughts are welcome!
peace

The video is pure baloney.

If you don't think so, click it back on, and replace the word God, every time they say it, with another invisible, not-provable something, like Flying Purple People Eater.

Are - YOU - having an existential crisis without my non-provable Flying Purple People Eater?

Are all YOUR accomplishments nothing without my invisible not-provable Flying Purple People Eater?

Think about it.

I'm going to guess not, - and neither are Atheists without YOUR invisible not-provable God.

Such ideas by the religious, - are just ridiculous.

*
 
Last edited:

idav

Being
Premium Member
Living a life without a belief in God is known to cause an existential crisis within most atheists. Imran Hussein explains why by referencing an ayah (verse) from the Qur'an. The Ayah in question is from Surah Ta'ha, 20:124 "And whoever turns away from My remembrance - indeed, he will have a depressed life, and We will gather him on the Day of Resurrection blind." - Dawah Digital blurb for the following video:


This video got me thinking. How do atheists deal with their existential crisis? Your thoughts are welcome!

peace
Is he talking about atheists or ex-theists? Why would atheists normally have any issues?
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Allow me to try to help our Muslim friends in understanding why atheism is not the burden that it seems to appear to be to (some of? many of?) them.

It is certainly true that atheism implies a lack of belief in a divine reason-for-being, a supreme planner, a meaning-giver.

That, I assume, may sound terrible to the point of despair to someone who feels the need for such an entity.

However, the plain fact is that not everyone feels such a need, particularly when we are not raised in a social environment that demands us to nurture said need. It is a confortable subject matter for bonding in some environments, but still not all that advisable a trait for people to develop.

Atheists often learn to value our existence that much more because it was never meant to be, never assured by a supreme power. That makes every single moment that much more unique, every attainment that much more meaningful.

Mortality is a fact of life. Not a disgrace to be denied, at least not always. Death is nothing more than a limitation, for sorrows and pain as much as for joys and hope. Living the best, most ethical and fulfilling life that we can is all that anyone can demand of oneself. Quite often knowing that is plenty enough for us.

The bottom line is that mindsets such as that of the OP's video suggest to me that they have a hard time understanding atheism and its implications and causes. It is dangerous to assume, as the video seems to, that theism (particularly in the Abrahamic mold) is a good and healthy fit for most people or can be made so. Such is not the case, particularly when too much emphasis is given to worries about afterlives and pleasing a supreme creator of everything.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Is he talking about atheists or ex-theists? Why would atheists normally have any issues?
Because, by a mainstream Muslim perspective, we are troubled enough to actually deviate away from communion with the All-Creator, I assume?
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
thank you, I did read your post. It's very interesting actually. As I mentioned, I do understand that theists can also experience an existential crisis as well, but the nature of it would be totally different - ie, it would revolve around the idea of "accountability". Most religions in the world teach a moral caveat which revolves around the idea of judgement/karma in the afterlife. For the atheist, there is the belief that there is no afterlife and therefore the idea of judgement/karma after death are irrelevant and this is the nature of the atheist existential crisis, that there is simply nothing, it's all pointless kinda thing. Of course, this providing that one is considering their existence in the first place to have some sort of meaning, but cannot allow themselves to believe it due to their atheism! - leading to the existential crisis within atheists.

It's very interesting to me.

Thank you for contributing :)

peace


Well, the first difference I see here is that many atheists, including myself, don't require eternal existence in order to achieve meaning. A candle can shed light and have meaning even if it eventually goes out. The *point* is to live *now*, not to wait until after death. Life doesn't become meaningless because it ends: it becomes much more meaningful! Carpe Diem!

As for where we find meaning, that is a personal thing. YOU get to decide what is meaningful for you. YOU get to take responsibility for your own actions and beliefs. And that is an incredibly liberating thing! To actually take responsibility for yourself. It isn't exactly making it up like a fairy tale: it is looking deep within yourself to find out what you really want and believe, what *you* think is meaningful for *you*.

Another thing you mentioned is the belief that the universe is not random. I encourage you to think about what that really means. I also do not believe the universe is random: it obeys the laws of nature, which are not random. But that doens't imply anything about how we humans find meaning in our lives. The laws of nature, while not random, are also not personal: the universe at large doesn't care whether we live or die. That is up to us.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
As I mentioned, I do understand that theists can also experience an existential crisis as well, but the nature of it would be totally different - ie, it would revolve around the idea of "accountability".

Do you mean the fear of damnation or some other cosmic punishment? Yes, we are spared that.
  • "To the philosophy of atheism belongs the credit of robbing death of its horror and its terror. It brought about the abolition of Hell." - Joseph Lewis
For the atheist, there is the belief that there is no afterlife and therefore the idea of judgement/karma after death are irrelevant and this is the nature of the atheist existential crisis, that there is simply nothing, it's all pointless kinda thing.

It's curious that you find the lack of this kind of existential angst in atheists - the lack of fear in postmortem retribution - a cause for a crisis in them. As I noted, atheists are free of that kind of cognitive dissonance.

Perhaps you're projecting what would be your own disorienting and troubling experience upon suffering a loss of grounding or foundation following a crisis of faith - a second kind of existential crisis at which the theist is at risk. This is also not an issue with the atheist, who has built his foundation without such beliefs.

If you see the seasoned atheist as being in the position that the theist who suddenly loses his centering would be in, then you don't understand us. It would be like a smoker who assumes that everybody needs a cigarette, and views nonsmokers as people continually jonesing for a cigarette. The nonsmoker has learned to live comfortably without a cigarette. It's the smoker that would have the crisis if he lost his cigarettes.

In any event, the theist is susceptible to two emotional crises to which the atheist is immune - fear of cosmic punishment, and crises of faith.

Of course, this providing that one is considering their existence in the first place to have some sort of meaning, but cannot allow themselves to believe it due to their atheism! - leading to the existential crisis within atheists.

Still?

You're here on a mixed forum claiming "Living a life without a belief in God is known to cause an existential crisis within most atheists." To a person, every atheist that has comment has told you that they haven't experienced an existential crisis, and now, you're explaining the mechanism "leading to the existential crisis within atheists."

When you read about cognitive styles - ways of processing information - you read about analytic versus holistic types. But I'm going to offer another axis upon which to apply this term: faith based thinking versus reason and evidence based thinking.

The latter evaluates the evidence dispassionately and open-mindedly, that is, without prejudgment, and with the ability and willingness to be convinced by a compelling argument.

The faith based thinker begins with an unsupported (or insufficiently supported) idea, chooses to believe it anyway, and only then begins evaluating evidence, but not for the purpose of arriving at whatever conclusion it suggests, but to cull that fraction of it that it appears can be used to support the faith based belief while ignoring or downplaying contradictory evidence.

Your comment about atheists would have been valid were it true, a fact which could only be derived from interviewing a sufficient sample of atheists and having most tell you that they have experienced an existential crisis. That's the reason and evidence based cognitive style.

But what I see is you having taken your position from sources with a religious agenda which includes demeaning atheism, meaning that you have apparently accepted an unsupported premise as fact.

Moreover, this thread is strong evidence that that idea is incorrect. The reason and evidence based thinker, whose present position is tentative and amenable to revision pending new data, changes his position on atheists. At a minimum, he becomes less certain that he is right. The degree of belief should never be more or less than the quantity and quality of the available evidence support, and needs to be reduced or reversed in the face of contradictory evidence.

Look at what your reaction has been to being told in no uncertain terms by about a half dozen atheist with no others disagreeing. You haven't budged an iota. You're still as firmly convinced that most of us experience these imaginary crises.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
The video talks of atheists forums where, supposedly, there are atheists aplenty talking about their frequent existential hardships.

I have to wonder what they are talking about. I have been frequenting various atheist forums for well over a decade now, and what I see is quite at odds with the video's impression.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
The video talks of atheists forums where, supposedly, there are atheists aplenty talking about their frequent existential hardships.

I have to wonder what they are talking about. I have been frequenting various atheist forums for well over a decade now, and what I see is quite at odds with the video's impression.

One of the hardships of being an atheist is having to put up with religious friends and family that think you must be miserable or immoral because you don't believe like them.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Living a life without a belief in God is known to cause an existential crisis within most atheists. Imran Hussein explains why by referencing an ayah (verse) from the Qur'an. The Ayah in question is from Surah Ta'ha, 20:124 "And whoever turns away from My remembrance - indeed, he will have a depressed life, and We will gather him on the Day of Resurrection blind." - Dawah Digital blurb for the following video:


This video got me thinking. How do atheists deal with their existential crisis? Your thoughts are welcome!

peace

So the Qur'an is the official document used for defining atheists? Brilliant logic.

How do we deal with a life not believing in a bronze age myth sans evidence. Easy in so many ways, one being we don't take notice of the nonsense in Qur'an.
 

jonathan180iq

Well-Known Member
How do atheists deal with their existential crisis?


We deal with any problem we encounter in exactly the same way as a theist; we work around our feelings, come up with pragmatic answers, and conform our proceeding ideologies or thoughts to that new format.

The fact that theists claim their revelations come from god, instead of themselves, doesn't change anything.

All humans deal with crises the same way.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I can't think, nor believe that all this existence is just random! There has to be something more

Existence has to be random (I prefer unplanned or unintended, but I'll accept random to mean the same for present purposes). Even if you throw a god in the mix, the god becomes the random element. You presumably believe than nobody created, designed, or assembled this god including itself inasmuch as something that doesn't exist cannot serve as a cause of anything including itself. If so, you've simply moved the problem back one step, and expanded existence from our visible universe to a larger arena, but still haven't resolved the randomness factor.

I've yet to see a theist willing to acknowledge this argument. It usually comes in the form of a statement that a cell is complex to have self-assembled, therefore an even more complex entity is offered to explain the existence of the cell (an ontological argument for God), but the existence of this even more complex entity is immune to this same objection: a god is too complex to exist undesigned and uncreated, therefore it needs its own creator.

The theist usually ignores this inconsistency even when it is pointed out to him. He fails to respond to it at all - probably because he must in order to hold onto one of his chief arguments for the existence of a god.

But the atheist need not, and in fact, should not. It's a special pleading fallacy. Once that's understood, all ontological argument for God melt away.

Incidentally, such arguments are god of the gaps arguments - pick whatever is left unexplained and attribute THAT to this unseen god - and they suffer from a another logical fallacy, argument from ignorance. With this fallacy, science hasn't yet discovered becomes science cannot will never discover, which in turn morphs into therefore God.

An awareness of these fallacies, the recognition that their use in supporting conclusions makes those conclusions unsound (non sequiturs), and the desire to avoid unsound conclusions causes the reason and evidence based thinker to reject such arguments.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Can you be certain that your faculties of rationality are sound?

No need to be.

Of course, certain doesn't mean correct, so let's assume that you mean justified certitude.

Certainty, absolute (or objective or ultimate) truth, and proof aren't generally available. What we use

Right thinking is determined empirically based on its fruits. If it works, that is, if deploying an idea facilitates making a choice leading to a desired outcome more often than competing ways of thinking, we keep the former and discard the latter. No proofs or certitude is involved in the process.

Here are a couple of ideas that may help explain:
  • Instrumentalism - belief that statements or theories may be used as tools for useful prediction without reference to their possible truth or falsity. Peirce and other pragmatists defended an instrumentalist account of modern science.
  • Empirical adequacy - A theory is empirically adequate, roughly, if all of what it says about observable aspects of the world (past, present, and future) is true
The first is self-explanatory: If an idea works, keep it and use it without regard to any other criteria of value including lack of proof.

The second is related. Empirical adequacy - the idea works - it's a keeper. Once again, if I hold a certain belief, the measure of that belief is not proof that establishes certitude, but the efficacy of the idea in helping achieve desired outcomes.

This is all there is most cases: We have desires and preferences, we make choices, and we experience the results of our choices (sensory perceptions of outcomes). If a person holds belief B that some action A will produce desired result D, and doing A will consistently achieve D, then if B is empirically adequate, and can provisionally be considered truth.

If A fails to achieve D, or doesn't succeed as often as an alternative belief, then B is wrong and should be replaced by the belief that works better.

In the case of my own reasoning abilities, no, I am not certain that they are sound, but as I indicated, I cannot be and need not be. It is sufficient that my present mode of thinking has served me well. If I can find pieces of it that can be modified or replaced with better ideas - ideas that produce desired outcomes for often - then I make the upgrade.

This is a different conception from that of the person asking, "Where's your proof?" I usually have none and need none.

A well-known creationist on RF repeatedly asks, "Sure, there is adaptation within species, but where's your proof of macroevolution?"

We tell her that we have none, need none, and are retaining the idea anyway because it works. It's an idea that unifies a mountain of existing ,and has successfully predicted for over a century-and-a-half kind of evidence might be found in the future, and what kind cannot.

That's empirical adequacy, which embraces instrumentalism.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
I can't think, nor believe that all this existence is just random! There has to be something more - which is why I believe God is the best explanation for the universe and our existence.

A common enough sentiment, but all the same one that puzzles me a bit.

Please allow me to ask, Mohsen: how do you feel when you are faced with situations of great loss or sorrow that, going by the available information, are not at all deserved?

How do you reconcile your belief in such a Creator God with the misery of, say, lovingly expecting the birth of a son only to learn that he or she suffers from some terrible infirmity (let's pick anencephaly for the sake of discussion)?

I honestly don't know how one can see the world as it exists and attribute its existence to a conscious and benevolent All-Maker.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Is he talking about atheists or ex-theists? Why would atheists normally have any issues?
For some reason a lot of theists think that without having belief in an afterlife that life is depressing and without meaning. My own opinion is it is they themselves who may be depressed, as they seem to fear the idea of mortality and a finite existence. It's hard for them to accept, so they project this fear onto those who don't believe in an afterlife.
 
Top