Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm not sure what to make of him or how to approach him. In one respect I tend to see him as a version of Hermes who "went bad". But I think there is a valid reason. Both are glib, mischievous, quick to think on their feet and get out of scrapes, and perhaps impart that to followers: getting someone out of a scrape or jam by inspiring the person.
But whereas Hermes' personality never changed from one of playful mischief and glibness, and never threw temper tantrums, Loki turned to the "dark side", threw temper tantrums and used his abilities for ill-purpose. To that end I'm not sure I would feel comfortable appealing to Loki, not knowing if he would help me or cause more trouble for me just for "a bit of fun" (as Tom Hiddleston's Loki put it).
On the other hand, by not appealing to him, would he feel slighted and cause me mischief? I don't know. However, I prefer to think that if he's given respect he's firmly on your side. It was a matter of being disrespected and dismissed, I think, that made him turn on the Aesir. This is the point about having a valid reason to become angry and bitter, the disrespect he was shown.
I like this interpretation thematically, but I disagree. I shall elaborate down below.Loki is the one who causes the die roll to come up the exact number you DIDN'T want.
And that chance of failure is what makes a game most fun.
Where Woden is brooding and solemn, Loki is happy and joyous. Loki is the Joker to Woden's Batman.
I'm not sure what to make of him or how to approach him. In one respect I tend to see him as a version of Hermes who "went bad". But I think there is a valid reason. Both are glib, mischievous, quick to think on their feet and get out of scrapes, and perhaps impart that to followers: getting someone out of a scrape or jam by inspiring the person.
But whereas Hermes' personality never changed from one of playful mischief and glibness, and never threw temper tantrums, Loki turned to the "dark side", threw temper tantrums and used his abilities for ill-purpose. To that end I'm not sure I would feel comfortable appealing to Loki, not knowing if he would help me or cause more trouble for me just for "a bit of fun" (as Tom Hiddleston's Loki put it).
On the other hand, by not appealing to him, would he feel slighted and cause me mischief? I don't know. However, I prefer to think that if he's given respect he's firmly on your side. It was a matter of being disrespected and dismissed, I think, that made him turn on the Aesir. This is the point about having a valid reason to become angry and bitter, the disrespect he was shown.
I like this interpretation thematically, but I disagree. I shall elaborate down below.
I have a riddle for you. What is the sum of Loki's actions? He had built the wall which encircles Asgard, the forging of Mjolnir is of his doing, it was his idea(If I remember properly) to disguise Thor to gain it back and save Freyja from Thrymr, through him Odin gained Sleipnir, so on and so forth. Things without which Asgard would've been defenseless, Midgard overran with those Jotunn dissatisfied with their icy lands and more. I would argue this is easily a net-positive.
What if Loki is just Odin in disguise? Before anyone says "But all of Odin's forms are missing an eye", who is the one who told us this? Odin. Not to mention, Loki himself has a similar 'theme' in his assumed shapes. It always has to do with the eyes. Suddenly it becomes apparent at just how deep a game Odin is playing, to hold off Ragnarok for just a year, a day, an hour more.
It's just one way I look at Loki.
Heh. You forgot one. He also, kinda, sorta, saved hope for mankind. ^_^
You see, by killing Balder, he actually ended up keeping him in Helheim, safe from Ragnarok, to come back when the world has been born again. I like to think he planned it deliberately, perhaps even with Odin. Plus, it gave him an excuse to duke it out with Heimdall.
Loki's fate in the Lokasenna has always seemed unfair to me. Odin casts Loki's son into the seas, binds another son in fetters, and casts his daughter into Niflheim. Loki, in parallel, casts Odin's son into Niflheim. Is not Loki's crime against Odin's son the same as Odin's crime against Loki's daughter??
I find it interesting that there was a difference between the God of Death and the God of the Place of the Dead. You'd think the one who rules over death as a function would inherently take care of that other stuff.I don't recall what Odin found offensive about Hela, but Fenrir and Jormungandr were deemed to be threats. Counterintuitive as it may seem it seems to me that Hela got the best of it... control over the fate of ordinary mortals (and at least one god) after their deaths, to either keep them or release them. Barring any other managing of the afterlife, she got quite a powerful, albeit not altogether cushy job.
If you're interested, I can help. Send me a message if you need anything.Reading this thread just made me realize I know absolutely nothing about the pantheon of which I would like to pay homage to... *hangs head*... Where to begin? *Shrug* ... Too the books *trudges off*
Reading this thread just made me realize I know absolutely nothing about the pantheon of which I would like to pay homage to... *hangs head*... Where to begin? *Shrug* ... Too the books *trudges off*
Yeah, ask away. I certainly don't know everything, but every little bit helps.
The Norse Myths by Kevin Crossley-Holland | 9780394748467 | Paperback | Barnes & Noble
The Prose Edda: Tales from Norse Mythology by Snorri Sturluson | 9780140447552 | Paperback | Barnes & Noble
Gods and Myths of Northern Europe by H. R. Ellis Davidson | 9780140136272 | Paperback | Barnes & Noble
Norse mythology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia