• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Native

Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist
Looking Back to the Scientific Future

Take your time to this 14 min. illustrated video by author and independent researcher, David Drew.


<

Don´t be disturbed by the ThunderboltsProject connection, but be open minded.

Description.

At the beginning of the 1900s, it was thought an improved understanding of electromagnetism offered the best way forward for astronomy. It is unfortunate, therefore, that many have become frustrated at the pace of progress in the space sciences.
Although most sciences have progressed leaps and bounds over the past hundred years, cosmology has fallen behind.
Certainly, numerous space missions have enjoyed remarkable success, but is it a testament to the engineers and technicians – or - those theoreticians who are continually surprised by findings that almost always contradict expectations?
Since July 2022, the James Webb Space Telescope has ramped up the cognitive dissonance as the spiraling, filamentary structure of the universe is being observed more clearly than ever—from an electrical plasma perspective.
-----
Author and independent researcher David Drew does not claim the EU Model has all the answers but advocates it will help direct us Back to the Future and herald the next era of cosmology.

My comment:
For my part, “going back to the future”, even includes revisiting the numerous ancient cultural and very similar “Stories of Creation”, which IMHOP in several cases supersedes much of the modern standing hypothesis and theories – mostly by having a cyclical perception of everything and having explanations based on the very terrestrial and celestial observation of nature in general.

Your thoughts and remarks?
 
Last edited:
Top