• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

MAGA World Claims Shooter was Trans

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
Wow just like the Democrats!




A notable difference between these and Trump: Trump did it because he didn't want to see a poir farmer's family land so close to his golf course.


That doesn't mean I condone Biden’s administration still building the border wall and taking land for it, but to me this says a lot about Trump's character that a lot of people seem to want to ignore.

Really, I drink Glenfiddich primarily due to this reason.

 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Back to reality; The investigators are still attempting to access three foreign encrypted platforms that Crooks used on his cellphone. This suggest others involved at the idea and planning stages. If we combine this with the porous Keystone Cops response by the DEI run Secret Service, who knows what to believe. Some are trying to pin it on Iran, but who knows, since transparency is not forthcoming from the regime, as the minions work on distraction conspiracy theories.
Source? If this is reality you should have a reality based source for it.
 

LeftyLen

Active Member
They really hate trans people. Seems like hate is all they have.

'This kind of rhetoric is pushed by Marjorie Taylor Greene and others that essentially falsely believe that being trans can lead to becoming a shooter. In a series of posts in 2022, Greene suggested being trans and taking psychiatric drugs "is the common deadly recipe for mass murder."

The desire for a mass shooter to be trans is so strong among MAGA Republican types that they will often run with a false narratives straight from the far right conspiratorial website 4chan. In 2022, Marjorie Taylor Green and other Republicans pushed a 4chan false conspiracy theory claiming the Uvalde shooter was trans.

Now it is happening again. In a viral post on Twitter, account "Paul Hookem," a pro-Trump and self-proclaimed meme account that is often the subject of Community Notes, is pushing the same narrative. The "Paul Hookem" account's bio claims the account was previously banned from Twitter for 4 years until Elon reinstated it.'

"hater-phobe-bigot-fascist" are rhetorical bromides the LEFT toss out ending any rational discourse. I am conservative and do not hate the mentally ill.
 

LeftyLen

Active Member
Because it is observed haening with the troubled far right people. They have a sickness.

You have your fair share of issues, namely your strange and inaccurate notions of woke.
1. Notes use of ad hominem fallacy*** 2. If my 'assessment ' of woke aka cultural marxism is incorrect, I invite coherent rebuttal
 

LeftyLen

Active Member
Because it is observed happening with the troubled far right people. They have a sickness.

You have your fair share of issues, namely your strange and inaccurate notions of woke.

Observations aren't insults.

I have. You never answered my questions. That suggests you haven't throught through your beliefs. And you paste your screed as if repeating your beliefs makes them credible. It's weakness.
In ANSWERING I assert like fundamentalism on the right woke is as religious, on the left. Curiously I have seen both the Woke and fundamentalists deny Woke and fundamentalism even exist. The existence of fundamentalism, over a hundred years old is often denied by the fundamentalists,- they claiming to be just, ‘Christians,’ and nothing more. They openly state all others are, ‘cults-heretics-reprobates-evolutionists.’ The comprehensive declaration of all others as being ‘cults-heretics-reprobate-evolutionists’ include all sectarians as well, designated as adversarial entities, according to the fundamentalists. ‘Christianity is not a religion,’ fundamentalists often declare, thus all not them, all Christian religions are therefore not Christian, summarily dismissed with a hand wave.



The Woke online see themselves as Social Justice Warriors exclusively defining Woke as the hundred year old Afro-American definition, nothing more, the actual dogmatic cultural Marxist stances they hold to, dismissed with a handwave .More evidence of a religious systematology
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
In ANSWERING I assert like fundamentalism on the right woke is as religious, on the left. Curiously I have seen both the Woke and fundamentalists deny Woke and fundamentalism even exist. The existence of fundamentalism, over a hundred years old is often denied by the fundamentalists,- they claiming to be just, ‘Christians,’ and nothing more. They openly state all others are, ‘cults-heretics-reprobates-evolutionists.’ The comprehensive declaration of all others as being ‘cults-heretics-reprobate-evolutionists’ include all sectarians as well, designated as adversarial entities, according to the fundamentalists. ‘Christianity is not a religion,’ fundamentalists often declare, thus all not them, all Christian religions are therefore not Christian, summarily dismissed with a hand wave.



The Woke online see themselves as Social Justice Warriors exclusively defining Woke as the hundred year old Afro-American definition, nothing more, the actual dogmatic cultural Marxist stances they hold to, dismissed with a handwave .More evidence of a religious systematology
See what I mean, strange and inaccurate notions of woke. What you assert isn't factual, so we throw it out.
 

LeftyLen

Active Member
See what I mean, strange and inaccurate notions of woke. What you assert isn't factual, so we throw it out.
"Inaccurate" meaning you do not like the definition, one held by MOST. Who is the one with an idiosyncratic definition? Now past societal ills resurrected ad nausium to stimulate false dilemmas about victim/oppressors is a propaganda ploy by demagogues craving power, historically an old stratagem employed by autocrats for centuries, and now this old tactic is brazenly employed by the woke mob further cementing its relation to neo-marxism. . The manufacturing of a threat, a tactic of totalitarians, assertions of an enemy, seen or not seen, real or unreal as justification of parasitic governments demanding ever increasing power to crush oppressors a maneuver used by demagogues for centuries. History displays over and over without exception the ceding of power to despotic leaders leads fosters totalitarianism. For the woke a continual menace from an oppressive power must exist or the entire woke narrative collapses. For the woke the menace of phobes-haters-bigots-fascists must be kept alive, endlessly promoted as a real existential threat resulting in the need to generate ever-more government power to combat the perils of phobes-haters-bigots-fascists, meaning all not...them.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
"Inaccurate" meaning you do not like the definition, one held by MOST. Who is the one with an idiosyncratic definition? Now past societal ills resurrected ad nausium to stimulate false dilemmas about victim/oppressors is a propaganda ploy by demagogues craving power, historically an old stratagem employed by autocrats for centuries, and now this old tactic is brazenly employed by the woke mob further cementing its relation to neo-marxism. . The manufacturing of a threat, a tactic of totalitarians, assertions of an enemy, seen or not seen, real or unreal as justification of parasitic governments demanding ever increasing power to crush oppressors a maneuver used by demagogues for centuries. History displays over and over without exception the ceding of power to despotic leaders leads fosters totalitarianism. For the woke a continual menace from an oppressive power must exist or the entire woke narrative collapses. For the woke the menace of phobes-haters-bigots-fascists must be kept alive, endlessly promoted as a real existential threat resulting in the need to generate ever-more government power to combat the perils of phobes-haters-bigots-fascists, meaning all not...them.
None of this is factual.

I note many who survived Maos 'cultural revolution' in china in the 1960's have written on the similarity of woke rhetoric to Maos rhetoric. furter exposing woke as Marxist. An Interview with Xi Van Fleet, Author of Mao’s America: A Survivor’s Warning
Irrelevant.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
That's shallow and incorrect.

Where you are incorrect:

I don't hate Trump. I just don't agree with his politics, style or character. And because of his lies and double talk I have no reason to trust or support him. And because of his rhetoric and stance I now have reason to be concerned about my freedom and safety. No. I don't love Trump either. I don't have to.

Also, I don't give a damn what kind of women he's into as long as they're consenting adults. He likes the good looking ones. Good for him. Go get'em tiger.
It was an hyperbole.
I said that people may hate him for different reasons...politics, economics, foreign affairs.
But that detail about women increases that hatred.
 

Kathryn

It was on fire when I laid down on it.
Same here. I know my state is going to go blue regardless, which leaves me free to vote my conscience (whereas people in swing States are forced in a position where they have to cast their vote either for or against someone).

'Forced' may not be the right word, but it's definitely more of a moral imperative for someone who's vote might actually effect an outcome.

So I'll probably be voting for Green party candidate Jill Stein (again), unless I can come up with a really imaginative write in.
I am going to write someone in. My state is not a swing state, thankfully.
 
Top