• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Mike Johnson, a staunch Louisiana conservative, is elected House Speaker

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I actually had to google images to find
what you were finding yucky.

I've only eaten a much larger kind, which
is prepared as only the five longitudinal
muscles, each about the size of a pencil.

Nothing in appearance, taste or texture
would be anything but a rare pleasure. Except
for someone with, you know, issues.

Like me. If you tried to get me to eat meat. :D
I've never had that kind prepared that way.
They were just globs of gelatinous horror.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
A more accurate description is a homophobic, sexist, insurrectionist theocrat.
Or, perhaps, a polished homophobic, sexist, insurrectionist theocrat, and one who was unanimously embraced by the Republicans in the House. Perhaps this clarity will inform the next election.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Your post was about conservatives.
Calling anything or anyone to their left "socialist" or "communist" is far from reasonable.

Political-Compass-for-2020-Election.png
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member

He, like the rest of the republican party, hates freedom, rights, equality, science, and democracy. They'll be this country's undoing.
 
Last edited:

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
You posted...
"....just swap him out with any far-right figure that works."
Left (socialist) & right (capitalist) aren't interchangeable.
Both can be authoritarian.
But only left is inexorably so.
I also posted...
"To U.S. conservatives, anything to the left of Mussolini is "socialist/communist", going by the general consensus that fascism is far-right. You disagree. That's fine, so I suggested swapping him out with someone you believe is. Of course social and capitalists aren't interchangeable, and of course both can be authoritarian, but that had nothing to do with my original statement.
To explain my point, I was referring to conservatives' tendency to call things socialist and communist that are nowhere near that corner of the political spectrum.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I also posted...
"To U.S. conservatives, anything to the left of Mussolini is "socialist/communist", going by the general consensus that fascism is far-right. You disagree.
There's your problem.
Socialist fascism is far left, eg, PRC, USSR, NK, Cuba, Khmer Rouge.
 
Top