• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Minnesota’s New ‘LGBT Education Specialist’ Thinks Teachers Should ‘Explain Nonbinary Identities’ To Preschoolers

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
We can't go against our dna.
DNA offers more than 2 simple sexes.
And I'm sure there are non-genetic issues further complicating sex.
Moreover, there is gender in addition to sex.
Not every brain matches the body housing it.
It's useful to understand this diversity, yet many people
are either unaware or in denial of such conditions. This
leads to prejudice & harm.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Simple. I'd rather not overload little kids with too much information they really don't need yet.

Let them be kids for awhile, let them learn to tie their shoelaces and cut construction paper , and make fun hand prints on paper plates as they learn to write their names on the bottom.

The adult stuff can come later on as their brains develop.
Is it "adult stuff" to know the proper names of your own body parts?
 

syo

Well-Known Member
I linked the Wikipedia article on sex chromosomal abnormalities in the prior post.
The anomalies are targeting specifically males, and the other anomalies are targeting specifically females. Even the anomalies have sex!
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The anomalies are targeting specifically males, and the other anomalies are targeting specifically females. Even the anomalies have sex!
If determined to assign one sex or the other, that
can be done. But is this more useful than recognizing
a spectrum? And should sex be forever what was
assigned at birth? In cases of ambiguous genitalia,
doctors have made mistakes.
Also, there is gender, which adds another layer of
complexity by not always matching sex.

Categorization / labelling should be useful, ie, serve
a purpose. There's nothing to prevent us from
adopting that which serves society best. I argue
for the spectrum view for reasons posted earlier.
 

syo

Well-Known Member
But is this more useful than recognizing
a spectrum?
A spectrum? Ah, my friend! Now I understand why we can't agree. In my vision, there isn't a sex spectrum. I will explain. A man that has anomalie with his x chromosome doesn't negate the fact that he is still a man. The anomalies sometimes mean that the persons having them can't have kids by reproduction. So what? They are still men. The same goes with women.

And I also believe, gays nowadays the vast majority do NOT have anomalies chromosomes, they are healthy.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
A spectrum? Ah, my friend! Now I understand why we can't agree. In my vision, there isn't a sex spectrum. I will explain. A man that has anomalie with his x chromosome doesn't negate the fact that he is still a man. The anomalies sometimes mean that the persons having them can't have kids by reproduction. So what? They are still men. The same goes with women.
That is one way to view things, & I won't say it's wrong.
But I find it less useful than a spectrum regarding gender.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Careful, you're starting to look like a nail.
Those things do indeed attract hammers.
thumb-and-thumbnail-picture-id637723526
 
Top