Secret Chief
Veteran Member
MoooooThen I'll spend less time addressing your posts.
Welcome to the socialist enclave, Brother Rev.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
MoooooThen I'll spend less time addressing your posts.
I suppose that to fundies with a simpleMooooo
Welcome to the socialist enclave, Brother Rev.
That's up to you.Then I'll spend less time addressing your posts.
Do you think he'd approve of celebratingJesus was brilliant. He handled the Pharisees and Romans with great finesse. He was sort of a smart ***. When I reread the Gospels a few years ago (and I highly encourage everyone to read or reread them - they aren't a hard read and it didn't take that long) I was really struck by how Jesus' words were so few and yet so strong. I guess somewhere along the way, I had bought into the idea of a meek and mild Jesus, and He really wasn't like that in my opinion.
I rather doubt it but I don't think Jesus cares much about politics one way or the other.Do you think he'd approve of celebrating
Confederate heritage, warts & all?
They may not all be leftists, butIn love when leftists fancy themselves bible scholars. Does love your neighbor as yourself mean let people do whatever they want? Love your enemies means let your enemies destroy you? Turn the other cheek means you can be abused? Treat others the way you want to be treated means people can do whatever they like to you? I notice people only listen to half the message. Disagreement= hatred right?
Rather uninvolved in morality, eh.I rather doubt it but I don't think Jesus cares much about politics one way or the other.
Anyone who fights for slavery is ****. Honoring a "heritage" that existed due to throwing a *****fit to preserveslavery is misguided at best.Rebels are heroes if they win, villains
if they lose.
Not really but He never seemed to care about politics one way or the other. Now POLITICIANS differ.Rather uninvolved in morality, eh.
First it's NPR. Laughable. Even 25 year employees of NPR know that NPR has lost the confidence of the American people. Next so what? It's not as if the knowledge atheists of agnostics any good. Most often their interpretation of Scripture is selective. I especially like when they imply loving people means letting people do whatever they like without a word of correction. That's my all time favorite.They may not all be leftists, but
Survey: Atheists, Agnostics Know More About Religion Than Religious
Two reasons, one is that they used to be religious and the better one understands a religion the more likely one is to drop it. That is why in biblical historians so often become atheists. Atheists did not become atheists on a whim. Or because they "hate God". It is usually due to following logic and reason and realizing that one cannot force one to believe the self contradictory.They may not all be leftists, but
Survey: Atheists, Agnostics Know More About Religion Than Religious
That's why Thomas Paine published Common Sense anonymously. He knew people would dismiss it as the words of a blasphemer.First it's NPR. Laughable. Even 25 year employees of NPR know that NPR has lost the confidence of the American people.
You imagine politics deals with morality?Rather uninvolved in morality, eh.
Not really but He never seemed to care about politics one way or the other. Now POLITICIANS differ.
Politics is often about (not always) ethics & morality.You imagine politics deals with morality?
Actually that's usually atheists who started out theists.Atheists did not become atheists on a whim. Or because they "hate God". It is usually due to following logic and reason and realizing that one cannot force one to believe the self contradictory.
OK. Look, I live in Ohio and as I've said before, one reason I LOVE it is because it played a big role in the Underground Railroad. I also love that it is a former Union state.Politics is often about ethics & morality.
A government that celebrates a history
of enslaving humans & violent treason
is such a case.
The source though you no doubt will dismiss it as well.First it's NPR. Laughable. Even 25 year employees of NPR know that NPR has lost the confidence of the American people. Next so what? It's not as if the knowledge atheists of agnostics any good. Most often their interpretation of Scripture is selective. I especially like when they imply loving people means letting people do whatever they like without a word of correction. That's my all time favorite.
Then perhaps the answer might be more self defense than anything else. Understanding the flaws in the reasoning of those that attack can be very useful. Which is probably why western atheists are better informed about Christianity than any other religion. For example in the US the odds of a Hindu claiming that they are "damned" by their religion, or whatever their equivalent is, would not have almost no threat of violence behind it since the Hindu's are an even smaller minority.Actually that's usually atheists who started out theists.
There are atheists who are atheists because they weren't really brought up with religion. Studies have not found this group to share in the same levels of logic and reason that apostate atheists are known for.