Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It's based on economic freedom and personal freedom.It all depends on what freedoms you want, because they both want different freedoms. It's a false dichotomy
They have been doing this for years.From the CATO institute. Do you suppose there may be some political bias?
A bias from an avowedly libertarian organisation? I can't imagine why.From the CATO institute. Do you suppose there may be some political bias?
How do Republicans rank in the list of most equitable states?
A tendentious list, from a libertarian think tank. It's quite ridiculous to suggest that people are not "free" in any state of the USA. It's not the USSR or N. Korea. It really just isn't.
I think what happens now, has not much to do with left or right anymore
People above 60 in the southern European country face fines of up to 100 euros a month if they refuse COVID jabs.
How the index is calculated
https://www.freedominthe50states.org/how-its-calculated
Interesting reading, I've not seen an index with a raw milk variable and a fireworks variable, let alone how they weight in relation to an equal rights amendment.
Mala prohibita and civil liberties: 1.2%
Affirmative action ban: 0.7%
Prostitution legal: 0.2%
Trans-fat bans: 0.1%
Raw milk legal: 0.1%
Mixed martial arts legal: 0.05%
Fireworks laws: 0.04%
Equal Rights Amendment: 0.03%
Physician-assisted suicide legal: 0.03%
DNA database index: 0.01%
Religious Freedom Restoration Act: 0.01%
It's based on economic freedom and personal freedom.
Sure lists can vary based on on perception, but there are hardcore facts as well that cannot be brushed off as false dichotomy.
Hmm. I see the Cato Institute was founded, in 1977, by three people, one of whom was a certain Charles Koch.Economic freedom being the freedom of the rich to exploit the poor, and the strong to abuse the weak?
It all depends on what freedoms you want, because they both want different freedoms. It's a false dichotomy
Which both lead me to note that there is nothing in all of the measures used that assesses outcomes -- desirable or undesirable. Fiscal policy may result in lower taxes, for example, but lower taxes can mean less means to provide assistance for those in dire need. Fact is, absent such means, sleeping under bridges, begging in the streets and stealing bread become last but necessary resorts.“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”
Anatole France
I think the problem here is with the thread's title.From the CATO institute. Do you suppose there may be some political bias?