Mother Teresa...Hell's Angel

[Spiderman]

Christopher Hitchens allegedly did not interview one of mother Teresa's poor people that she cared for in his documentary. I'd trust the people in her care more than I'd trust him as far as how evil she is.

Bottom line is, I wonder how many quadriplegics, blind, deaf, homeless, hungry, or dying people that p*** and s*** themselves Hitchens cared for. I'm sure people could come up with all criticisms if we looked at his life.

Mother Teresa didn't have to leave the comfort of a convent to live with a bunch of smelly lepers in the worst of slums. She did it free of charge with no guarantee she would become so famous and eventually benefit financially from it.

Either way, she wasn't using the alms to live like a Queen. She was around the most repulsive, most forgotten, most hideous throw aways of society in the worst slums of the world, year after year. It's no wonder she began to lose faith. If you were constantly around the injured, the sick, the dying, the miserable, the lonely, the lunatics, the quadriplegics, and those who can't help but urinate and defecate themselves, I'm sure your faith would be shaken too.

Mother Teresa should have been more liberal with the morphine and feel good chemicals, but remember that morphine is also severely addictive. I'm not saying she made the right choice regarding who did and did not get modern addictive chemicals, but I don't see other people coming forward to care for those whom human nature despises the most.

Without Mother Teresa, many people would have died in a gutter with no love or dignity.

Mother Teresa made mistakes and was a sinner; but look at King David and the murder and adultery he was guilty of. I'm sure he made many mistakes and errors in judgment (and even human's rights abuses) and atrocities that are not contained in Scripture. Yet he is called "A man after God's own heart."

I wonder how many people, (less than 1% I'm assuming) would volunteer to live in the worst slums caring for the most unwanted like Mother Teresa did. It's easy for people to point the finger, but I wonder what they are doing for the poorest of the poor, the sickest of the sick?

One thing I can assure is this: Mother Teresa was a lot more kind to the poor and sick than God is! I don't see God lifting a finger to help them!

 

[Salvador]

Christopher Hitchens was just as wrong to criticize a lovely saint like Mother Teresa, as he'd be if he were to criticize girl scouts for selling girl scout cookies.

 

[Vinayaka]

There are always two sides to every story. Just sayin'.

 

[whirlingmerc]

Christopher Hitchens allegedly did not interview one of mother Teresa's poor people that she cared for in his documentary. I'd trust the people in her care more than I'd trust him as far as how evil she is.

Bottom line is, I wonder how many quadriplegics, blind, deaf, homeless, hungry, or dying people that p*** and s*** themselves Hitchens cared for. I'm sure people could come up with all criticisms if we looked at his life.

Mother Teresa didn't have to leave the comfort of a convent to live with a bunch of smelly lepers in the worst of slums. She did it free of charge with no guarantee she would become so famous and eventually benefit financially from it.

Either way, she wasn't using the alms to live like a Queen. She was around the most repulsive, most forgotten, most hideous throw aways of society in the worst slums of the world, year after year. It's no wonder she began to lose faith. If you were constantly around the injured, the sick, the dying, the miserable, the lonely, the lunatics, the quadriplegics, and those who can't help but urinate and defecate themselves, I'm sure your faith would be shaken too.

Mother Teresa should have been more liberal with the morphine and feel good chemicals, but remember that morphine is also severely addictive. I'm not saying she made the right choice regarding who did and did not get modern addictive chemicals, but I don't see other people coming forward to care for those whom human nature despises the most.

Without Mother Teresa, many people would have died in a gutter with no love or dignity.

Mother Teresa made mistakes and was a sinner; but look at King David and the murder and adultery he was guilty of. I'm sure he made many mistakes and errors in judgment (and even human's rights abuses) and atrocities that are not contained in Scripture. Yet he is called "A man after God's own heart."

I wonder how many people, (less than 1% I'm assuming) would volunteer to live in the worst slums caring for the most unwanted like Mother Teresa did. It's easy for people to point the finger, but I wonder what they are doing for the poorest of the poor, the sickest of the sick?

One thing I can assure is this: Mother Teresa was a lot more kind to the poor and sick than God is! I don't see God lifting a finger to help them!
View attachment 24260

Mother Theresa had an interesting motivation. She had a contemplative order. She and her sisters got up early like 4am and contemplated about Jesus and then went out to serve Him where Jesus was disguised as the poor.

 

[Shad]

Christopher Hitchens allegedly did not interview one of mother Teresa's poor people that she cared for in his documentary. I'd trust the people in her care more than I'd trust him as far as how evil she is.

Bottom line is, I wonder how many quadriplegics, blind, deaf, homeless, hungry, or dying people that p*** and s*** themselves Hitchens cared for. I'm sure people could come up with all criticisms if we looked at his life.

Mother Teresa didn't have to leave the comfort of a convent to live with a bunch of smelly lepers in the worst of slums. She did it free of charge with no guarantee she would become so famous and eventually benefit financially from it.

Either way, she wasn't using the alms to live like a Queen. She was around the most repulsive, most forgotten, most hideous throw aways of society in the worst slums of the world, year after year. It's no wonder she began to lose faith. If you were constantly around the injured, the sick, the dying, the miserable, the lonely, the lunatics, the quadriplegics, and those who can't help but urinate and defecate themselves, I'm sure your faith would be shaken too.

Mother Teresa should have been more liberal with the morphine and feel good chemicals, but remember that morphine is also severely addictive. I'm not saying she made the right choice regarding who did and did not get modern addictive chemicals, but I don't see other people coming forward to care for those whom human nature despises the most.

Without Mother Teresa, many people would have died in a gutter with no love or dignity.

Mother Teresa made mistakes and was a sinner; but look at King David and the murder and adultery he was guilty of. I'm sure he made many mistakes and errors in judgment (and even human's rights abuses) and atrocities that are not contained in Scripture. Yet he is called "A man after God's own heart."

I wonder how many people, (less than 1% I'm assuming) would volunteer to live in the worst slums caring for the most unwanted like Mother Teresa did. It's easy for people to point the finger, but I wonder what they are doing for the poorest of the poor, the sickest of the sick?

One thing I can assure is this: Mother Teresa was a lot more kind to the poor and sick than God is! I don't see God lifting a finger to help them!
View attachment 24260

There are independent reports about this so-called Saint.

 

[Spiderman]

There are independent reports about this so-called Saint.

I'm not dismissing them. Everyone is a sinner and makes mistakes. I'm sure her life was irritating and total hell sometimes.

the smell of the decomposing flesh of a leper combined with the urine and feces she was having to clean up on a daily basis would have taken a huge toll on her mind and emotions.

 

[Bob the Unbeliever]

Christopher Hitchens allegedly did not interview one of mother Teresa's poor people that she cared for in his documentary. I'd trust the people in her care more than I'd trust him as far as how evil she is.

Bottom line is, I wonder how many quadriplegics, blind, deaf, homeless, hungry, or dying people that p*** and s*** themselves Hitchens cared for. I'm sure people could come up with all criticisms if we looked at his life.

Mother Teresa didn't have to leave the comfort of a convent to live with a bunch of smelly lepers in the worst of slums. She did it free of charge with no guarantee she would become so famous and eventually benefit financially from it.

Either way, she wasn't using the alms to live like a Queen. She was around the most repulsive, most forgotten, most hideous throw aways of society in the worst slums of the world, year after year. It's no wonder she began to lose faith. If you were constantly around the injured, the sick, the dying, the miserable, the lonely, the lunatics, the quadriplegics, and those who can't help but urinate and defecate themselves, I'm sure your faith would be shaken too.

Mother Teresa should have been more liberal with the morphine and feel good chemicals, but remember that morphine is also severely addictive. I'm not saying she made the right choice regarding who did and did not get modern addictive chemicals, but I don't see other people coming forward to care for those whom human nature despises the most.

Without Mother Teresa, many people would have died in a gutter with no love or dignity.

Mother Teresa made mistakes and was a sinner; but look at King David and the murder and adultery he was guilty of. I'm sure he made many mistakes and errors in judgment (and even human's rights abuses) and atrocities that are not contained in Scripture. Yet he is called "A man after God's own heart."

I wonder how many people, (less than 1% I'm assuming) would volunteer to live in the worst slums caring for the most unwanted like Mother Teresa did. It's easy for people to point the finger, but I wonder what they are doing for the poorest of the poor, the sickest of the sick?

One thing I can assure is this: Mother Teresa was a lot more kind to the poor and sick than God is! I don't see God lifting a finger to help them!
View attachment 24260

Teresa was a HORRID MONSTER.

She actually believed that suffering was... GOOD.

She stole monies that were sent to her "charity" to buy medicines for the sick people she was allegedly "caring" for.

She "cared" for them-- yeah, right. Warehouse them in nasty, dark hard-floors with very little space between the tattered blankets they were placed on to DIE.

Victims in her "care" were denied access to their families, once interred into her Houses Of Death.

She literally stated she thought suffering "glorified jesus".

But--- when it came time for HER to get sick? PRIVATE JET FLIGHT TO ITALY. ONLY THE BEST DOCTORS. ALL THE MONEY IN VATICAN CITY, IF NEEDED.

She was a hideous monster. And no-- I did not read Hitchen's expose--- didn't need to.

Bonus: Her "charity" is being investigated for fraud.

 

[Aupmanyav]

Her charity was not selfless. Hinduism does not give credit to such charity. She was a missionary, and therefore, an enemy. Moreover, she had a contorted mind, demanding a conversion of a sufferer just before his/her death. People say that it was what she thought was the best for them, I think it was diabolical and the height of foolishness.

 

[onlytruth]

in a predominant Hindu city an estimated 1 million people turned out to pay their respects to her.

 

[Spiderman]

Her charity was not selfless. Hinduism does not give credit to such charity. She was a missionary, and therefore, an enemy. Moreover, she had a contorted mind, demanding a conversion of a sufferer just before his/her death. People say that it was what she thought was the best for them, I think it was diabolical and the height of foolishness.

Mother Teresa brought Hindu and Muslim literature for the Muslims and Hindus she was caring for.

 

[Spiderman]

Teresa was a HORRID MONSTER.

She actually believed that suffering was... GOOD.

She stole monies that were sent to her "charity" to buy medicines for the sick people she was allegedly "caring" for.

She "cared" for them-- yeah, right. Warehouse them in nasty, dark hard-floors with very little space between the tattered blankets they were placed on to DIE.

Victims in her "care" were denied access to their families, once interred into her Houses Of Death.

She literally stated she thought suffering "glorified jesus".

But--- when it came time for HER to get sick? PRIVATE JET FLIGHT TO ITALY. ONLY THE BEST DOCTORS. ALL THE MONEY IN VATICAN CITY, IF NEEDED.

She was a hideous monster. And no-- I did not read Hitchen's expose--- didn't need to.

Bonus: Her "charity" is being investigated for fraud.

Trying to make people feel good about their suffering and their lot is not necessarily a bad Thing.

We all have to suffer and die, so we might as well try to see good in it. Bottom line is, Mother Teresa was easing people's suffering as a general rule.

Giving a leper some food and cleaning him up and wiping his rear end and giving hugs actually relieved suffering.

Mother Teresa encouraged people to relieve suffering in others.

 

[Spiderman]

The world is in agony, so it's not difficult to understand why some Christians will glorify suffering.

They assume God exist, there's suffering everywhere, and God wanted his only son to be crucified, so it leaves Christians with the belief that suffering is a good thing.

However, I've also heard Mother Teresa tell people to love one another and ease the suffering of the poor.

 

[Aupmanyav]

in a predominant Hindu city an estimated 1 million people turned out to pay their respects to her.

The hype was built-up during the long anti-Hindu regime of Congress (Indian National Congress) and Bengal had an anti-Hindu Communist government. Glorification of Teresa was natural. Media was the winner.

 

[Shad]

I'm not dismissing them. Everyone is a sinner and makes mistakes. I'm sure her life was irritating and total hell sometimes.

the smell of the decomposing flesh of a leper combined with the urine and feces she was having to clean up on a daily basis would have taken a huge toll on her mind and emotions.

I was just pointing out there are more critics than just Hitchens.

 

[Bob the Unbeliever]

Trying to make people feel good about their suffering and their lot is not necessarily a bad Thing.

We all have to suffer and die, so we might as well try to see good in it. Bottom line is, Mother Teresa was easing people's suffering as a general rule.

Giving a leper some food and cleaning him up and wiping his rear end and giving hugs actually relieved suffering.

Mother Teresa encouraged people to relieve suffering in others.

No! She deliberately and with malice **increased** their suffering, the more suffering, the more "glory" to her version of god.

There was no decrease under her watch.

Truly, if god was real, it is a horrid beast, for allowing her to do what she did.

 

[Spiderman]

No! She deliberately and with malice **increased** their suffering, the more suffering, the more "glory" to her version of god.

There was no decrease under her watch.

Truly, if god was real, it is a horrid beast, for allowing her to do what she did.

one of the first people she took care of was a dying person in the streets. She brought him to the hospital and they turned him away. If the hospital would have accepted him, she would have left him there to get better.

So she gave him a nicer place to die than alone on the streets. Could you tell me how she deliberately made people suffer more who were starving to death in the streets of Calcutta?

Could you give me one quote from Mother Teresa where she said we should increase people's suffering?

I have many quotes from her that say we should feed the hungry, give shelter to the needy, and care for the sick.

 

[Bob the Unbeliever]

one of the first people she took care of was a dying person in the streets. She brought him to the hospital and they turned him away. If the hospital would have accepted him, she would have left him there to get better.
.

She may well have begin with the most empathetic of intentions. That's not where she ended up, however-- she ended up stuffing the unwanted folk, into dark, hot, disease-infested warehouse of death. Conditions were worse than what would be allowed for *dogs*.

True mercy would have been to end their suffering humanely, instead of prolonging it like she did, WITHOUT TREATMENT.

So she gave him a nicer place to die than alone on the streets. Could you tell me how she deliberately made people suffer more who were starving to death in the streets of Calcutta?.

"nicer?" Dark, dirty, next to moaning and dying folk, sometimes next to dead bodies for days. Explain how that is "nicer"?

Could you give me one quote from Mother Teresa where she said we should increase people's suffering?.

It's on the interwebs. Has been for years.

I have many quotes from her that say we should feed the hungry, give shelter to the needy, and care for the sick.

Try expanding your search beyond catholic pages... But yes, she was happy to pander to the media. Did it quite a lot, in fact.

I just go by testimony of people who had to endure her systematic abuse.

Moreover? Her "sisters of mercy" collected millions upon millions of monies-- supposedly to help alleviate people's suffering. What did they DO with the money? Back to Vatican City. Almost none was actually spent on the victims of her abuse.

Her "charity" is being investigated for rampant fraud, even now.