Your Opinion article references unspecified "historic reforms ... that enjoy support from 90% of veterans". Okay. That's pretty light on specifics. But for the sake of argument, let's assume this is true. The Trump administration deserves credit for that.
In addition, your Opinion article says Trump "signed bills that fixed long-standing issues". Ah. He signed bills. In other words, bills that were crafted and passed by the Democratic House, and Republican Senate. That's certainly nice.
But stay with me - I'm going somewhere with this.
Separately, I note that the Obama/Biden administration passed important VA reforms, too. Notably, the landmark bipartisan Veterans Choice law that Trump has incorrectly tried to take all credit for.
Sources:
AP FACT CHECK: Trump takes credit for Obama's gains for vets
And:
Obama signs landmark VA reform law
So, adding this all together, what does it tell us?
I guess for me, all this suggests that it is possible, in fact, to implement policies that benefit vets
without having a Commander in Chief who maligns them behind their backs and uses them as props to glorify himself.
If you think otherwise ... if you think we simply
cannot take care of our veterans without a Commander in Chief who behaves this way ... maybe your standards are too low?