Fluffy
A fool
Not sure if anyone will be interested in this but I'll post it on here anyway just incase . If people are and it starts turning into a debate then it might be a good idea if a mod could move the thread to a debate forum.
I am starting a philosophy course at my school this year and I had my first 2 lessons today. Omg I love it so much. I have an attention span of two seconds and this subject held it for an hour . I love it to the extent that I wish I could just take philosophy modules for all my A-levels and screw having a balanced education .
Ahem but to get away from me lusting over my course, I thought that some of the things we learn and talk about would be perfect for threads on here. Our course is split into three modules, 'Epistemology' (which is what we are doing at the moment hence the thread title), 'Philosophy and Religion' and 'Descartes'. So without further ado I'll go on to some of the interesting things which people can discuss on here if they want .
Basically, we started to look at the nature of knowledge. The main thinking points were, what is knowledge and is 'true' knowledge attainable? Is skepticism a preferable worldview given the answer to these questions?
Additionally we looked at the responsibility of the transmission of knowledge. We were challenged with the following scenario: A time capsule has been invented that can travel back to ancient Rome. It is very small and can only contain a piece of paper half the side of a sheet of A4. Given that translation will be 100% accurate, what would you put on that sheet of paper.
I am starting a philosophy course at my school this year and I had my first 2 lessons today. Omg I love it so much. I have an attention span of two seconds and this subject held it for an hour . I love it to the extent that I wish I could just take philosophy modules for all my A-levels and screw having a balanced education .
Ahem but to get away from me lusting over my course, I thought that some of the things we learn and talk about would be perfect for threads on here. Our course is split into three modules, 'Epistemology' (which is what we are doing at the moment hence the thread title), 'Philosophy and Religion' and 'Descartes'. So without further ado I'll go on to some of the interesting things which people can discuss on here if they want .
Basically, we started to look at the nature of knowledge. The main thinking points were, what is knowledge and is 'true' knowledge attainable? Is skepticism a preferable worldview given the answer to these questions?
Additionally we looked at the responsibility of the transmission of knowledge. We were challenged with the following scenario: A time capsule has been invented that can travel back to ancient Rome. It is very small and can only contain a piece of paper half the side of a sheet of A4. Given that translation will be 100% accurate, what would you put on that sheet of paper.