• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

My RF awards go to:

S

SoulTYPE

Well-Known Member
Most Charismatic - Feathers

Most Humourous - Spinkles

Grooviest Member - Ceridwen

Most Unique - I guess myself.

Most Informative - Witness of Jah

Most Wise - TVOR

Most Talkative - umm

Friendliest - Mrs C

Most Helpful - Robtex

Nominate your people now.
 
S

SoulTYPE

Well-Known Member
I'd have to trade then.

Wait, na.

I was once quoted on this board as the most negative poster here. Let us hope that quote doesn't remain.
 
retrorich

retrorich

SUPER NOT-A-MOD
SoulTYPE01 said:

Most Unique - I guess myself.
Click to expand...
Actually, "most unique" is incorrect. There are no degrees of uniqueness. Unique means one of a kind. One thing/person cannot be more one-of-a-kind than another. A thing/person is either unique or not unique.

(I am an annoying grammar geek.) :D
 
S

SoulTYPE

Well-Known Member
retrorich said:
Actually, "most unique" is incorrect. There are no degrees of uniqueness. Unique means one of a kind. One thing/person cannot be more one-of-a-kind than another. A thing/person is either unique or not unique.

(I am an annoying grammar geek.) :D
Click to expand...
Perhaps "Most Likely to be unique". could be applicable.

I am a geek of another kind..
 
retrorich

retrorich

SUPER NOT-A-MOD
SoulTYPE01 said:
Perhaps "Most Likely to be unique". could be applicable.

I am a geek of another kind..
Click to expand...
Yes, "most likely to be unique" is correct.

What kind of a geek are you? :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top