Your intentional ignorance of science is not a defense for cling to a mythical Creation story based on tribal scriptures over 2000 years old.Have you never watched a wolf or any other species teach its offspring how to hunt etc?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Your intentional ignorance of science is not a defense for cling to a mythical Creation story based on tribal scriptures over 2000 years old.Have you never watched a wolf or any other species teach its offspring how to hunt etc?
Wtf are your talking about?Your intentional ignorance of science is not a defense for cling to a mythical Creation story based on tribal scriptures over 2000 years old.
insofar as I understand, much more time and effort is required on the part of humans to perform agricultural tasks than ants. But if you want to believe that somehow ants figured it out for themselves a long time ago and passed on the knowledge, go for it. I believe that ants have a genetic instinct to do what they do, similar to bees becoming a queen. Ingrained, instinctive. Not like man.Actually other species pass down knowledge just like we do.
Wtf are your talking about?
This response to the thread: 'Have you never watched a wolf or any other species teach its offspring how to hunt etc?'
I was just reading about a sultan hundreds of years ago who had like 1,000 children or so. He was the chief of Morocco a long time ago. You think ants have written documentaries about their history to pass down knowledge? And genetic testing to know who's who?Actually other species pass down knowledge just like we do.
(He was probably responding to me...)Wth does your comment of..
"Your intentional ignorance of science is not a defense for cling to a mythical Creation story based on tribal scriptures over 2000 years old"
How in anyway does that have anything to do with watching a wolf teach its offspring to hunt?
Nope he clarified it was a response to my post about wolves. He is from NC, he might be hitting that moonshine lol(He was probably responding to me...)
Well, you made me wonder about birds and nests. Also beehives. (Who taught them?) I don't know that much about wolves. Oh yes, and queen bees.Nope he clarified it was a response to my post about wolves.
Well, maybe he means the both of us.Nope he clarified it was a response to my post about wolves. He is from NC, he might be hitting that moonshine lol
Who taught you? Your parents and others humans right. Why don't you think others species can teach their offspring etc.Well, you made me wonder about birds and nests. Also beehives. (Who taught them?) I don't know that much about wolves. Oh yes, and queen bees.
We learn from others to an extent. But! are you saying that bees learned from other bees how to build a hive?Who taught you? Your parents and others humans right. Why don't you think others species can teach their offspring etc.
I did not learn to come out of my mother's womb. But going back to bees for a while, if I may, I'm learning. Bees make hives by producing wax flakes using their wax glands for starters. So puleeze don't tell me that they learned this from other bees. Please. I hope not.Who taught you? Your parents and others humans right. Why don't you think others species can teach their offspring etc.
@ZwingIt eventually dissipates and goes ?? (into the ground? or sea?) I'm just guessing, of course, but it is a fascinating thought that yes, hair and nail growth continues after death.
Well, I’ll be a son of a gun! Thanks for the disabuse!
This is another example of empty claims based on ignorance that amounts to plain old, baseless, science denial.lYes, it is said that somewhere somehow homo sapiens interbred with neanderthals somehow (I think that's what I remember reading). I find the conjectures fascinating. Not that I believe them, but fascinating nonetheless because it is really fantasy based on the possibility and the theory of evolution. I was never a fan of Jurassic Park (didn't see it, but I know many who loved it), or Star Trek, or other sci=fi types but I guess people are drawn to the possibilities.
Superiority in all matters of Wisdom.Wtf are your talking about?
Low sarcasm really dresses up aThis is another example of empty claims based on ignorance that amounts to plain old, baseless, science denial.
You are free to deny science to your hearts content, but unless you have posts on the topic of this thread and evidence to support your claims, I would appreciate that you not disrupt and derail this thread by turning it into a bully pulpit for your personal views. If you can't post on point, then move on.
Good morning! -- May be -- but I didn't dream it up. In reference to these claims and the thread, where are the effects of the dating process the scientists used? Scientists can claim lots of things.This is another example of empty claims based on ignorance that amounts to plain old, baseless, science denial.
You are free to deny science to your hearts content, but unless you have posts on the topic of this thread and evidence to support your claims, I would appreciate that you not disrupt and derail this thread by turning it into a bully pulpit for your personal views. If you can't post on point, then move on.
Who's denying science? Seems like those who think that phrases such as 'maybe, could be, might be, possibly be,' really mean "that's what it is."This is another example of empty claims based on ignorance that amounts to plain old, baseless, science denial.
You are free to deny science to your hearts content, but unless you have posts on the topic of this thread and evidence to support your claims, I would appreciate that you not disrupt and derail this thread by turning it into a bully pulpit for your personal views. If you can't post on point, then move on.