Hello everyone; this morning on the Today Show, I saw just the last portion of an interview with an author of a fictional "Gospel According to Judas". The first thing that came to my mind was, wait, isn't the Gospel of Judas one of the old non-Canonical texts?
Well, it seems like it is now both. Here's an excerpt regarding the "Gospel According to Judas" taken from MSNBC's site:
Then, contrarily, Wikipedia's entry on the Gospel of Judas can be found at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Judas
So does anyone know what's going on here? It seems odd that a novelist could write a fictitious book in the name of an already existing historical, albeit non-Canonical, text, moreover posing as the son of Judas.
Unfortunately I haven't read either.
Well, it seems like it is now both. Here's an excerpt regarding the "Gospel According to Judas" taken from MSNBC's site:
(http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/17802844/)"The Gospel According to Judas," published simulataneously in eight languages this month, is a fictionalized account of the life of Jesus purportedly written by Judas son, Benjamin. Authored by novelist Jeffrey Archer and biblical scholar Francis J. Moloney, the book follows the style of the gospels to offer what some reviewers say is a more sympathetic portrayal of Judas. Archer and Maloney were invited to talk about their book on TODAY.
Then, contrarily, Wikipedia's entry on the Gospel of Judas can be found at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Judas
So does anyone know what's going on here? It seems odd that a novelist could write a fictitious book in the name of an already existing historical, albeit non-Canonical, text, moreover posing as the son of Judas.
Unfortunately I haven't read either.