Mike10
New Member
As a Presbyterian, I think the new Mary Queen of Scots (2018) was modern and cool with just enough fantasy to remind yourself hey, commercialism. Rent it UHD 4.99.
The Pilgrims sought religious liberty and denominationalism its reported this may have been 1/3rd of Churches, during Cromwell's English Civil War, the US civil war harkens to, would be an apex. During the American Revolution this chart claims 1/5th congregational and 1/5th Presbyterian. Congregational later converts always proudly touted around as "Presbygationalist". (https://www.researchgate.net/figure/CHURCH-CONGREGATIONS-IN-1775-76_tbl1_259581152)
.
Congregationalists and Presbyterians never really developed cultural,lingual,or ingroup characteristics, Cromwell's independents had a different reaction in the English Civil War than the Continental Reformed movement, this is a means of government over Churches is Presbyterian. The Reformation in the British Isles denoted by the Bishops War as a marker has no Bishops, the Greek Lingua Franca lends Priests/Elders as Presbyterian. Deadly highbrow. (Plan of Union of 1801 - Wikipedia). Presidents now speak of all these origins under a Presbyterian handle.
The movie casually tossed around age old lines about Papists, as a Roman derogatory. Elizabeth I becomes "Overlord of Scotland" sounds made up. John Knox has progressive libel against Mary Queen of Scots until it sticks. Notice when the battle you have the highground....
newsone.com
Frederick Douglass was a leading voice in antislavery in "What is fourth of July to a slave?" . I will paste this entire paragraph since Presbyterianism is told to fall down itself for the antislavery cause. Especially since Confederate Generals after the war aren't changing these lines any.
At the very moment that they are thanking God for the enjoyment of civil and religious liberty, and for the right to worship God according to the dictates of their own consciences, they are utterly silent in respect to a law which robs religion of its chief significance, and makes it utterly worthless to a world lying in wickedness. Did this law concern the “mint, anise, and cumin” — abridge the right to sing psalms, to partake of the sacrament, or to engage in any of the ceremonies of religion, it would be smitten by the thunder of a thousand pulpits. A general shout would go up from the church, demanding repeal, repeal, instant repeal! — And it would go hard with that politician who presumed to solicit the votes of the people without inscribing this motto on his banner. Further, if this demand were not complied with, another Scotland would be added to the history of religious liberty, and the stern old Covenanters would be thrown into the shade. A John Knox would be seen at every church door, and heard from every pulpit, and Fillmore would have no more quarter than was shown by Knox, to the beautiful, but treacherous queen Mary of Scotland. The fact that the church of our country, (with fractional exceptions), does not esteem “the Fugitive Slave Law” as a declaration of war against religious liberty, implies that that church regards religion simply as a form of worship, an empty ceremony, and not a vital principle, requiring active benevolence, justice, love and good will towards man. It esteems sacrifice above mercy; psalm-singing above right doing; solemn meetings above practical righteousness. A worship that can be conducted by persons who refuse to give shelter to the houseless, to give bread to the hungry, clothing to the naked, and who enjoin obedience to a law forbidding these acts of mercy, is a curse, not a blessing to mankind. The Bible addresses all such persons as “scribes, Pharisees, hypocrites, who pay tithe of mint, anise, and cumin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy and faith.”
The new Mary Queen of Scots movie had African and Asian lead councilmembers in Elizabeth I's court. This seems like mostly a dead American religion touted by foreign film lobbies. The Baptists follow a different group than the Pilgrims, the Methodists as well are said to have grown prominent during the Awakenings the First and Second Great Awakenings and to have Union sympathies during the Civil War and antislavery sympathy. The chart above tends to claim that most other (British Isle) conformist religions to have already dissipated by this date, but frequent is a Virginia planters Anglican/Episcopal (Rock of Ages suggesting Reformed Anglican) suggesting an outcrowd of the Neo-Catholic Oxford Movement of the 1830's in England (A Christmas Carol by Dickens). The Anglican Church was claimed to have revolted itself. The Pope has sent Jefferson Davis a crown of thorns.
For Eisenhower/Reagan administrations to pointedly be leading the ship of state by reframing the Declaration of Independence as those equal rights endowed to all denominations, in fact, makes this very denomination understandably, understandably possibly not legal, and forsaken. Right now, the development of a Moonies alternative in an Orthodox Presbyterian association of Koreans in America? I think its a horrible idea to say anyone has chosen any of this quirk. None of this quirk is chosen in the association of pro-immigration citizens etc. Its claimed fancifully and fantastically at times 95% of Korean immigrants are in this Orthodox and Catholic Presbyterian association of Churches like North Ireland, Scotland historical American Presbyterianism including North/South Presbyteries in the Catholic (Universal) Presbyterian Church. As for any Koreans being of the cultural, historical, or useful association in the Church, what evidence would ever be presented? Whats the idea?
The Pilgrims sought religious liberty and denominationalism its reported this may have been 1/3rd of Churches, during Cromwell's English Civil War, the US civil war harkens to, would be an apex. During the American Revolution this chart claims 1/5th congregational and 1/5th Presbyterian. Congregational later converts always proudly touted around as "Presbygationalist". (https://www.researchgate.net/figure/CHURCH-CONGREGATIONS-IN-1775-76_tbl1_259581152)
.
Congregationalists and Presbyterians never really developed cultural,lingual,or ingroup characteristics, Cromwell's independents had a different reaction in the English Civil War than the Continental Reformed movement, this is a means of government over Churches is Presbyterian. The Reformation in the British Isles denoted by the Bishops War as a marker has no Bishops, the Greek Lingua Franca lends Priests/Elders as Presbyterian. Deadly highbrow. (Plan of Union of 1801 - Wikipedia). Presidents now speak of all these origins under a Presbyterian handle.
The movie casually tossed around age old lines about Papists, as a Roman derogatory. Elizabeth I becomes "Overlord of Scotland" sounds made up. John Knox has progressive libel against Mary Queen of Scots until it sticks. Notice when the battle you have the highground....
Frederick Douglass And The Lingering Relevance Of His ‘What To The Slave Is The Fourth of July?’ Speech
There are still many parallels today with what Frederick Douglass described in his speech to white America delivered on July 5, 1852.
newsone.com
At the very moment that they are thanking God for the enjoyment of civil and religious liberty, and for the right to worship God according to the dictates of their own consciences, they are utterly silent in respect to a law which robs religion of its chief significance, and makes it utterly worthless to a world lying in wickedness. Did this law concern the “mint, anise, and cumin” — abridge the right to sing psalms, to partake of the sacrament, or to engage in any of the ceremonies of religion, it would be smitten by the thunder of a thousand pulpits. A general shout would go up from the church, demanding repeal, repeal, instant repeal! — And it would go hard with that politician who presumed to solicit the votes of the people without inscribing this motto on his banner. Further, if this demand were not complied with, another Scotland would be added to the history of religious liberty, and the stern old Covenanters would be thrown into the shade. A John Knox would be seen at every church door, and heard from every pulpit, and Fillmore would have no more quarter than was shown by Knox, to the beautiful, but treacherous queen Mary of Scotland. The fact that the church of our country, (with fractional exceptions), does not esteem “the Fugitive Slave Law” as a declaration of war against religious liberty, implies that that church regards religion simply as a form of worship, an empty ceremony, and not a vital principle, requiring active benevolence, justice, love and good will towards man. It esteems sacrifice above mercy; psalm-singing above right doing; solemn meetings above practical righteousness. A worship that can be conducted by persons who refuse to give shelter to the houseless, to give bread to the hungry, clothing to the naked, and who enjoin obedience to a law forbidding these acts of mercy, is a curse, not a blessing to mankind. The Bible addresses all such persons as “scribes, Pharisees, hypocrites, who pay tithe of mint, anise, and cumin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy and faith.”
The new Mary Queen of Scots movie had African and Asian lead councilmembers in Elizabeth I's court. This seems like mostly a dead American religion touted by foreign film lobbies. The Baptists follow a different group than the Pilgrims, the Methodists as well are said to have grown prominent during the Awakenings the First and Second Great Awakenings and to have Union sympathies during the Civil War and antislavery sympathy. The chart above tends to claim that most other (British Isle) conformist religions to have already dissipated by this date, but frequent is a Virginia planters Anglican/Episcopal (Rock of Ages suggesting Reformed Anglican) suggesting an outcrowd of the Neo-Catholic Oxford Movement of the 1830's in England (A Christmas Carol by Dickens). The Anglican Church was claimed to have revolted itself. The Pope has sent Jefferson Davis a crown of thorns.
For Eisenhower/Reagan administrations to pointedly be leading the ship of state by reframing the Declaration of Independence as those equal rights endowed to all denominations, in fact, makes this very denomination understandably, understandably possibly not legal, and forsaken. Right now, the development of a Moonies alternative in an Orthodox Presbyterian association of Koreans in America? I think its a horrible idea to say anyone has chosen any of this quirk. None of this quirk is chosen in the association of pro-immigration citizens etc. Its claimed fancifully and fantastically at times 95% of Korean immigrants are in this Orthodox and Catholic Presbyterian association of Churches like North Ireland, Scotland historical American Presbyterianism including North/South Presbyteries in the Catholic (Universal) Presbyterian Church. As for any Koreans being of the cultural, historical, or useful association in the Church, what evidence would ever be presented? Whats the idea?