• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

New Trump Grift: $100,000 Watches

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
He's basically Mr. Haney from Green Acres now:

If this money ends up in his campaign coffers, this is illegal.
His money doesn't seem to be going to campaigning:

"t’s long felt like the Donald Trump campaign and the Republican Party have had no ground game at all. There have been scattered reports of Trump having far too few field offices in swing states and such. But has Trump’s ground game merely looked small in comparison to Kamala’s massive ground game, or does Trump actually not have a ground game? Now we have our answer.

"The Associated Press has published a lengthy article exposing the startling fact that the Trump campaign and the GOP really do have basically no ground game. There’s just about no one knocking on doors in swing states. Even some local Republican officials are raising questions about why they’re seeing no evidence of a ground game from their party or candidate.

"This isn’t surprising. Donald Trump is only “running” for President to try to raise money for his mounting legal bills, as he still tries to find a way to keep himself out of prison. So of course the money that’s coming in isn’t going back out for things like field offices or ground game efforts."
(source)
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
He's basically Mr. Haney from Green Acres now:


His money doesn't seem to be going to campaigning:

"t’s long felt like the Donald Trump campaign and the Republican Party have had no ground game at all. There have been scattered reports of Trump having far too few field offices in swing states and such. But has Trump’s ground game merely looked small in comparison to Kamala’s massive ground game, or does Trump actually not have a ground game? Now we have our answer.
"The Associated Press has published a lengthy article exposing the startling fact that the Trump campaign and the GOP really do have basically no ground game. There’s just about no one knocking on doors in swing states. Even some local Republican officials are raising questions about why they’re seeing no evidence of a ground game from their party or candidate.
"This isn’t surprising. Donald Trump is only “running” for President to try to raise money for his mounting legal bills, as he still tries to find a way to keep himself out of prison. So of course the money that’s coming in isn’t going back out for things like field offices or ground game efforts." (source)
So, if he uses campaign contributions for his legal bills, would that be illegal also?
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
So, if he uses campaign contributions for his legal bills, would that be illegal also?
From what I have heard explained it is legal for him to use campaign money to pay lawyers. It has to be disclosed in financial reports.

His money doesn't seem to be going to campaigning:

Trump is getting help from his buddy Musk. I suppost Musk understands how to campaign better than Trump's staffers. The question is if this is an illegal donation to the campaign.

 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
From what I have heard explained it is legal for him to use campaign money to pay lawyers. It has to be disclosed in financial reports.


Trump is getting help from his buddy Musk. I suppost Musk understands how to campaign better than Trump's staffers. The question is if this is an illegal donation to the campaign.

Paywall, C+P a good fair use piece. :)
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
TRUMP: The economy is so bad people can't buy basic necessities.

ALSO TRUMP: Buy these Trump watches for $100,000

Wyoming allows operators of LLC to be completely anonymous. Hmmm....


Maybe start by telling the whole story for a change.

The watches start at around 400 and goes up to 100,000.

It's because of the gold and diamonds set into the timepieces that makes it expensive.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
Maybe start by telling the whole story for a change.

The watches start at around 400 and goes up to 100,000.

It's because of the gold and diamonds set into the timepieces that makes it expensive.
I listened to a podcast where a watch expert did an assessment on the Trump watces and the one for $400 was estimated to cost about $35 to make with off the shelf parts, and the same for the $700 watch at $50, the main difference here is the saphire crystal. Glass crystals cost about $1 and saphire crystals cost about $15. I did not know that. Otherwise they are basic $100 watches being massively overpriced.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I listened to a podcast where a watch expert did an assessment on the Trump watces and the one for $400 was estimated to cost about $35 to make with off the shelf parts, and the same for the $700 watch at $50, the main difference here is the saphire crystal. Glass crystals cost about $1 and saphire crystals cost about $15. I did not know that. Otherwise they are basic $100 watches being massively overpriced.
Unless of course you want to add in the diamonds and the gold.

If I was wealthy I'd probably have gone for a Rolex.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
If Trump knows how to do anything, he knows how to maneuver money from his campaign to his pockets and vice versa according to the immediate convenience.

I am certain that there is plenty of direct and indirect ways, including offers of exchanges of services and payments.
I'm curious what the status is on the stocks of Truth Social. He says he won't sell. I think the time limit has passed where he couldn't unload them. But I think the stock price has to be at or above $!6. I saw it was getting close to $16 last week.
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
if he uses campaign contributions for his legal bills, would that be illegal also?
I think so, but I'm not sure. As you likely know, it wouldn't matter to him if it were.
Floridian Magas decided to take a 5-finger discount on Trump merch.
They look like MAGA:

1727729526683.png


Make America Great Again!

Speaking of which, on that page was an article about a similar looking person who seems to be of the same culture, and what a culture it is:

From Woman Again Busted For Dildo Battery

1727729606434.png


If I was wealthy
Grammar tip if you don't mind.

This sentence is the subjunctive mood, which is used when describing possibilities, desires, suggestions, and the like.

The verb was above should be were. Drop the if from your sentence and it becomes a statement of alleged fact. It has gone from the subjunctive mood to the indicative mood.

Were is the plural of was. He/she/it was, but they were.

We see that again here, as (he/she/it) visits becomes (they) visit:

She visits her mother every Friday. If she were to visit on Sundays instead, there would be less traffic.

 
Top