Father Heathen
Veteran Member
No jail time for woman who admitted having sex with 13-year-old, having his baby
I'm wonder if they'll garnish his allowance for child support.
I'm wonder if they'll garnish his allowance for child support.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No jail time for woman who admitted having sex with 13-year-old, having his baby
I'm wonder if they'll garnish his allowance for child support.
The victim’s family is also looking ahead to the next steps in this case. They plan on asking the courts to give the 13-year-old custody of the baby. Currently, Serrano has custody. Serrano will find out in May how long she’ll be on probation.
Of course. This is another example of how attitudes are inconsistent based on the sex of the victim and the assailant."having sex with" = "raping"
Independently from age.Of course. This is another example of how attitudes are inconsistent based on the sex of the victim and the assailant.
And that's called a double standard/hypocrisy.Independently from age.
Because if it's a woman who sexually harasses a man, that is not considered a crime.
On the contrary, if a man puts a hand on a woman's shoulder, that sexual harassment.
And a lot of it due to weird sexual attitudes. Strange that they have that attitude in Colorado Springs, the evangelical stronghold of the west. I figured they liked to come down hard on unmarried sex.The US seems to be turning more and more into a dumpster fire by the day. It's so sad what has become of a country with so much wealth and potential to do better.
An adult having "sex" with any minor should/must be considered rape. It's that simple. The laws in the US are inconsistent, only applying to some adults and certain groups of people. Why have any sex crime laws if they do not apply to the general public?Independently from age.
Because if it's a woman who sexually harasses a man, that is not considered a crime.
On the contrary, if a man puts a hand on a woman's shoulder, that's sexual harassment.
An adult having "sex" with any minor should/must be considered rape. It's that simple. The laws in the US are inconsistent, only applying to some adults and certain groups of people. Why have any sex crime laws if they do not apply to the general public?
"having sex with" = "raping"
if it's a woman who sexually harasses a man, that is not considered a crime.
There is no good way to resolve this. Punishment seems a bit pointless and unnecessarily vindictive. I suppose it's the well-being of the baby that matters, now. Which I expect would be better off with it's mother than it's young teenage father.
They also are very angry, and want vengeance on the mother. And to saddle their teenage son with a baby he is not really responsible for existing. I don't think they are thinking about the well-being of their son or of the child.Considering the boy's family wants the baby, I expect the baby to be better off with them.
Nah, this is more of a conservative thing:Liberal lawyers...
Of Course. Why would the victim being younger make it less rapey?Question: If the child was 8 would that still stand?
If the grandparents want to raise their grandchild, which is getting more common, it works better than a pedophile or a child raising a baby.Considering the boy's family wants the baby, I expect the baby to be better off with them.
I'm not sure that a baby is better off with a child raping parent.There is no good way to resolve this. Punishment seems a bit pointless and unnecessarily vindictive. I suppose it's the well-being of the baby that matters, now. Which I expect would be better off with it's mother than it's young teenage father.