• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

North Korea says it has successfully tested an intercontinental ballistic missile.

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
Given it reached an altitude of 1,700 miles, the warhead could potentially hit anywhere on Earth. Most satellites orbit in the 400 to 800 Km altitude, so this dummy warhead was well and truly in orbit, the difference between satellites and warheads is that the payload must deorbit using onboard thrusters at the appropriate time to hit the target.

Having said that, it is SOP to downplay the potential of DPRK's military capability, hence the Alaska scenario. Given that they have launched satellites before, they have long been able to reach the US, but a nuclear warhead is relatively heavy and it is only now that apparently they are able to realize their goal of orbiting a nuclear warhead capable of striking any city in the US, or the world for that matter.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Idk, make the world think they are psycho?

It's funny, belief that regimes don't simply act psychotically (even when they practically are) has me to read a LOT about various infamous historical regimes, from Robespierre to Pol Pot.

But there are times the answers seem pretty hard to grasp in truth. For me, this is one of them. I can only really make any sense of it in terms of being a cult of personality, which is what leads me to think the nukes are about regime protection more than anything else.

Wishful thinking, perhaps...
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Given it reached an altitude of 1,700 miles, the warhead could potentially hit anywhere on Earth. Most satellites orbit in the 400 to 800 Km altitude, so this dummy warhead was well and truly in orbit, the difference between satellites and warheads is that the payload must deorbit using onboard thrusters at the appropriate time to hit the target.

Having said that, it is SOP to downplay the potential of DPRK's military capability, hence the Alaska scenario. Given that they have launched satellites before, they have long been able to reach the US, but a nuclear warhead is relatively heavy and it is only now that apparently they are able to realize their goal of orbiting a nuclear warhead capable of striking any city in the US, or the world for that matter.

ICBMs (even if this were truly one) are suborbital. Their range, while extreme, is limited.
That's without worrying about North Koreans particular technical hurdles, including getting an effective payload up, and then also getting it effectively shielded through re-entry.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Closer and closer to the day that China realizes what a threat they are. We have nothing to worry about. Its only S. Korea and Japan that are really under any kind of threat.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Closer and closer to the day that China realizes what a threat they are. We have nothing to worry about. Its only S. Korea and Japan that are really under any kind of threat.
The worry is that a local conflict would draw us in.
It's not predictable how far this could go.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
The worry is that a local conflict would draw us in.
It's not predictable how far this could go.
We would be all in. I have no doubt about that, and I would be one of the first to die. Its possible, however, to reunite S and N Korea. This should be USA's real long term strategic goal, just as it should be China's goal to prevent such reunion. The nukes are being used as a distraction to keep us from focusing on that.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
We would be all in. I have no doubt about that, and I would be one of the first to die. Its possible, however, to reunite S and N Korea. This should be USA's real long term strategic goal, just as it should be China's goal to prevent such reunion. The nukes are being used as a distraction to keep us from focusing on that.
If practical, I'd prefer to be all out.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
It's funny, belief that regimes don't simply act psychotically (even when they practically are) has me to read a LOT about various infamous historical regimes, from Robespierre to Pol Pot.

It could be that they're psycho, although in post-revolutionary situations, there may be a strong motive towards revenge against one's former enemies. Of course, one might argue that anyone who seeks revenge is mentally ill.

But there are times the answers seem pretty hard to grasp in truth. For me, this is one of them. I can only really make any sense of it in terms of being a cult of personality, which is what leads me to think the nukes are about regime protection more than anything else.

Wishful thinking, perhaps...

I have trouble grasping all of this as well. Historically, Korea has been more of a client state being pushed around by larger powers. Their strategic location made them a source of dispute between Japan and Russia. They were resentful of Japanese occupation, but to make matters worse, the major Allied powers divided the occupation of Korea, which ultimately led to the Korean War and the situation we're facing today.

I suppose if we had refrained from intervening in the Korean War and simply let the North Koreans have South Korea, then Korea would be unified and might very well be more "normalized" today - similar to what China has become. Even Vietnam has somewhat mellowed out in recent years, but would they be that way if South Vietnam was still intact?

Strictly speaking, I don't really blame North Korea (or any country) for being fearful and resentful towards what they see as "Western imperialism." The North Koreans know they're being watched and targeted, and they've seen US military aggression and interventionism all across the world. We're worried about a single missile which can take a pot-shot at US soil, while we have an entire arsenal of ICBMs, bombers, ships, tanks, etc. They certainly know what we can do to them, so they likely see themselves as the desperate underdog going up against a behemoth.

Russia and China might have some influence in the region, although the more we antagonize Russia, the greater the likelihood that they may want to aid North Korea to be an even bigger thorn in our side.
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
ICBMs (even if this were truly one) are suborbital. Their range, while extreme, is limited.
That's without worrying about North Koreans particular technical hurdles, including getting an effective payload up, and then also getting it effectively shielded through re-entry.
Sure, but in this case DPRK could not risk overflying other countries and so sent it up 1700 miles and brought it down in the Japan Sea. ICBMs can be modified to launch satellites and I do not doubt that the DPRK have developed a nuclear payload to go with it which is capable of reaching any designated US city.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Sure, but in this case DPRK could not risk overflying other countries and so sent it up 1700 miles and brought it down in the Japan Sea. ICBMs can be modified to launch satellites and I do not doubt that the DPRK have developed a nuclear payload to go with it which is capable of reaching any designated US city.
Space is only around 62 miles straight up.

1700 miles?

I'm taking its the range of the missile.
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
Space is only around 62 miles straight up.

1700 miles?

I'm taking its the range of the missile.

No, the range could be up to 4,970 miles, this is how it works....

_95294552_icbm_trajectories_624_v2.png


The North's state media said the missile, Hwasong-14, flew 933 km (580 miles), reaching an altitude of 2,802 km (1,741 miles) in its 39 minutes of flight.

Some analysts said the flight details suggested the new missile had a range of more than 8,000 km (4,970 miles), which would put significant parts of the U.S. mainland in range, a major advance in the North's program.

North Korea says its ICBM can carry nuclear warhead; U.S. calls for global action
 
Top