PoetPhilosopher
Veteran Member
By the way, I don't see Krishna as the Supreme God, but I do see him as an awesome god.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Baha'u'llah never claimed to be God. He claimed to be a Manifestation of God who spoke for God.So you think this "Bahaullah" was a "god"?
So what does society need to change about itself and its rule such that when the next manifestation of God or the divine comes, that religious history isn't repeated with people mocking, abusing, imprisoning, or even killing the manifestation of the divine?
That won't ever happen because God is purely spiritual in nature.
Such "man-gods" are just false man made God constructs, mythologies, that were invented so that the primitive people of the times could relate to, something their small minds could handle.
I'd say Bahaullah was real - the only question was whether he was who he says he was.
Baha'u'llah never claimed to be God. He claimed to be a Manifestation of God who spoke for God.
“Attract the hearts of men, through the call of Him, the one alone Beloved. Say: This is the Voice of God, if ye do but hearken. This is the Day Spring of the Revelation of God, did ye but know it. This is the Dawning-Place of the Cause of God, were ye to recognize it. This is the Source of the commandment of God, did ye but judge it fairly. This is the manifest and hidden Secret; would that ye might perceive it. O peoples of the world! Cast away, in My name that transcendeth all other names, the things ye possess, and immerse yourselves in this Ocean in whose depths lay hidden the pearls of wisdom and of utterance, an ocean that surgeth in My name, the All-Merciful. Thus instructeth you He with Whom is the Mother Book.”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, pp. 33-34
He was both.... Not only THAT, He was a Servant of God. There is no reason why a Manifestation of God cannot ALSO be a Messenger and a Servant of God. Jesus was all three of these and so was Baha'u'llah. But both of them were Manifestations of God only in the sense that They "manifested" God's attributes. Baha'is do no believe Jesus or Baha'u'llah BECAME God in the flesh, as Christians believe about Jesus.This Baha'u'llah is either a "messenger" or a "manifestation" of "god". It cannot be both ways.
When you make the claim that he is the "manifestation of "god"", that means that your "god" is manifesting himself as that physical person. (Like the corrupted Jesus myth.) Then he's no more just a "messenger", but "god" himself. So get your story straight.
Call it whatever you want to. That won't make it what you believe it is. That is just YOUR personal opinion, we all have those. You have only seen a few quotes so you do not know what Baha'u'llah has to offer.And thanks for once again presenting evidence to back up the statement I keep making, that Baha'u'llah has nothing truly spiritual to offer, so speaks in bombastic gobbledygook meant to bedazzle people into thinking he has "something" to offer. But he doesn't, it's just meaningless bombastic gobbledygook.
I have no claim. Baha'u'llah made the claim and He backed them up with evidence.And BTW - that quote does NOT back up your claim.
If "messianic figure" sounds too Abrahamic and restricting in your view, then please translate the term to something like "hero figure" or "teacher figure"; some expected or desired individual and/or personification of a mindset that's going to help humans become better creatures and guide them into a new era.
So what does society need to change about itself and its rule such that when the next manifestation of God or the divine comes, that religious history isn't repeated with people mocking, abusing, imprisoning, or even killing the manifestation of the divine?