• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Now that Biden is "immune" perhaps he ought to decree a little justice on trump

Bear Wild

Well-Known Member
I suspect that you find it cathartic, but don't think such chatter is helpful or, for that matter, responsible.
Except it reelected the concerns about the judgment but the supreme court by one of the dissenting judges. Not towards Biden but towards any president in the present of future. The ruling seemed politically motivated to protect Trump from prosecution but it gives too much protection to any president now and in the future.
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
And yet he continues "forgiving" student loans even after the SCOTUS has ruled it unconstitutional for him to do so.
Looks like Biden has forgotten that he ignores the law whenever it suits him, just as he forgets many other things.

Correction: He is forgiving student loans within the parameters set forth by the Supreme Court.

The difference: One helps Americans, one helps Donald Trump.
 

Bear Wild

Well-Known Member
Actually I view Biden as a sock puppet president with those unelected pulling his strings doing stuff like that.

I can see his puppeteers creating death lists that would rival Stalin.
Who exactly is on this list?
Both sides have serious problems. Biden should have stepped down and the democrats should have allowed others to challenge him from the beginning of this campaign. Republicans are supporting a candidate with reckless speeches, erratic behavior, clear attempts of trying to subvert the democratic process and they are all supporting things that they do not agree with as if they are being controlled. They cannot answer any difficult questions. Unfortunately we have too bad candidates put in this position by self serving party members.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
quote-anyone-who-is-capable-of-getting-themselves-made-president-should-on-no-account-be-allowed-douglas-adams-0-17-47.jpg
Before he said it, Kurt Vonnegut argued
it in the short story, Harrison Bergeron.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Correction: He is forgiving student loans within the parameters set forth by the Supreme Court.

The difference: One helps Americans, one helps Donald Trump.
One rules with the most oppressive and least free states in the entire nation. Guess what party has the distinction of being the bottom feeders here.

Enuf said.
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
Correction: He is forgiving student loans within the parameters set forth by the Supreme Court.

The difference: One helps Americans, one helps Donald Trump.
One helps bribe college graduates (at the expense of all taxpayers) to vote for Biden.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
"Unfortunately"?
I was being facetious. I do not want a Democratic dictator any more than I want a Republican one. Biden is ethical. He has morals. So he is not willing to become a dictator even if it is the only way to solve the problem of Trump. He probably believes that going against the Constitution and his oaths would be a bad thing, even though the USSC said that it would be okay.
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
One helps bribe college graduates (at the expense of all taxpayers) to vote for Biden.
Bingo. These people will always bribe rather then earn anything on merit.

There's "bribing," then there's delivering on campaign promises that actually help American citizens. It's not bribing when it is done to promote the welfare of the people, it is doing the job.
 
Last edited:

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
I was being facetious. I do not want a Democratic dictator any more than I want a Republican one. Biden is ethical. He has morals. So he is not willing to become a dictator even if it is the only way to solve the problem of Trump. He probably believes that going against the Constitution and his oaths would be a bad thing, even though the USSC said that it would be okay.
They did not say any such thing. They gave parameters of what immunity is and isn't. The left is losing it, Biden lied today in his comments and the usual suspects are too.

He said,

“I know I will respect the limits of presidential power as I have for the three-and-a-half years, but any president, including Donald Trump, will now be free to ignore the law,

This is untrue, nowhere in the decision does it say Presidents can ignore the law. It says the president is immune when doing his constitutional or congressional mandated duties. Those are lawful by definition.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
They did not say any such thing. They gave parameters of what immunity is and isn't. The left is losing it, Biden lied today in his comments and the usual suspects are too.

He said,

“I know I will respect the limits of presidential power as I have for the three-and-a-half years, but any president, including Donald Trump, will now be free to ignore the law,

This is untrue, nowhere in the decision does it say Presidents can ignore the law. It says the president is immune when doing his constitutional or congressional mandated duties. Those are lawful by definition.
No, for almost anything that a President can make a half donkeyed excuse for makes a President immune.

The current USSC has been screwing up lately in order after order. There are huge signs of corruption there.
 

McBell

Unbound
They did not say any such thing. They gave parameters of what immunity is and isn't. The left is losing it, Biden lied today in his comments and the usual suspects are too.

He said,

“I know I will respect the limits of presidential power as I have for the three-and-a-half years, but any president, including Donald Trump, will now be free to ignore the law,

This is untrue, nowhere in the decision does it say Presidents can ignore the law. It says the president is immune when doing his constitutional or congressional mandated duties. Those are lawful by definition.
Have you read the actual bill and the dissentions?

They have been linked numerous times in this thread.

I flat out ask because there are those (you know, three Supreme Court Judges) who know more about than you and who have voiced their opinions.

Perhaps you should actually read them, and read them with comprehension as the goal.
leave your obvious confirmation bias outside.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
So then the whole "enuf said" was a lie?

Either you have said enough or you haven't.
If you keep saying after claiming to have said enough....
Nope. Enuf means you made the point and it can't be argued further.

Please stay up with the vernacular.
 
Top