Laniakea
Not of this world
Here be one: Log into FacebookIf you say so.
Of course, I would ask you to prove it, but your history of presenting more excuses than evidence proceeds you.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Here be one: Log into FacebookIf you say so.
Of course, I would ask you to prove it, but your history of presenting more excuses than evidence proceeds you.
You not think yo own posts be good???Poor thing.
Being so speechless and yet completely unable to stop yourself from responding you are reduced to empty copy/paste.
Perhaps a short nap would help?
Now you are not even trying.You not think yo own posts be good???
Trying what? To get you to make sense? That ship sailed a long time ago.Now you are not even trying.
now you made it to just plain boring.Trying what? To get you to make sense? That ship sailed a long time ago.
If you say so.
Of course, I would ask you to prove it, but your history of presenting more excuses than evidence proceeds you.
the racism in post #73.
You should really pay better attention to the conversation.
I think that ship has already passed out of the observable universe right now.Trying what? To get you to make sense? That ship sailed a long time ago.
When the mention of someone's color has absolutely nothing to do with the context, subject matter, etc and is only presented as a means of distraction...But it's just always has to be racism when the other side mentions a person's color. Isn't it?
Nope. I'm just calling the bull**** out when I see it.When the mention of someone's color has absolutely nothing to do with the context, subject matter, etc and is only presented as a means of distraction...
Well it worked.
I called out the racism.
Then you wanted to jump in, without know diddly squat what was going on trying to educate and end up falling on your face.
Better luck next time.
It appears to me you are merely shoveling more bovine feces.Nope. I'm just calling the bull**** out when I see it.
No. Especially given the fact people like you and others reject what they dont want to hear.It appears to me you are merely shoveling more bovine feces.
Especially given the fact you did not address the point of the post you responded to.
Ah,No. Especially given the fact people like you and others reject what they dont want to hear.
You are not even making sense now.Ah,
You mean like when you did not address the point of a post you went to length to quote?
really?You are not even making sense now.
Ah,No. Especially given the fact people like you and others reject what they dont want to hear.It appears to me you are merely shoveling more bovine feces.Nope. I'm just calling the bull**** out when I see it.When the mention of someone's color has absolutely nothing to do with the context, subject matter, etc and is only presented as a means of distraction...
Well it worked.
I called out the racism.
Then you wanted to jump in, without know diddly squat what was going on trying to educate and end up falling on your face.
Better luck next time.
Especially given the fact you did not address the point of the post you responded to.
You mean like when you did not address the point of a post you went to length to quote?
And yet, multiple presidents have ordered such things, and they weren't prosecuted, even before the ruling.A president does not have the authority to do something that is illegal or unconstitutional, Trying to have an american citizen killed would be illegal.
From the "what's good for the goose" dept.
"Delivering on campaign promises" is referred to as "pandering to his base in his bid to get re-elected" when a Republican does it.
"black lady Jackson" .... ?Who appointed black lady Jackson (who admitted to not knowing what a woman is)? She voted very recently against J6 political prisoner convictions? biden, Biden, BIDEN!
Ketanji Brown Jackson joins conservative justices in upending hundreds of January 6 cases
The Supreme Court on Friday narrowed the interpretation of a federal criminal law under which many January 6 rioters have been charged.reason.com
Oh boy, you're playing a game of mimicry again. How original and not at all juvenile.And admitting there is a problem is the first step.
You hang in there now.
We be rootin fer ya!
Oh, do you go around calling people "black lady Jackson?"Nope. I'm just calling the bull**** out when I see it.
No you're not. You're playing a game of whataboutism.Nope. I'm just calling the bull**** out when I see it.