tytlyf
Not Religious
My source referred to administrations. Those are a lot more damaging than non-administrations. False equivalence.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
NRA being investigated for Russian ties
- Thread starter tytlyf
- Start date
No, and I was talking about Hillary, you sexist pig-dog.Clinton shot somebody?!
Wow, I’ve heard people accuse him of being a lying rapist before but now you say he shot somebody! You’re not talking about Vince Foster are you?
Re-read the source. Although it lists both Executive and Legislative offenses, a simple survey shows many more indictments and convictions from Democratic administration officials than Mother Jones claims. Your Mother Jones source claims only 1 Democrat administration official was convicted in the last 53 years. Yet there was 1 under Obama (Patraeus) and 2 more under Clinton(Sanders and Druyen). It misread the Wikipedia source of scandals (which it cited) neglecting to count guilty pleas as convictions (as in the Patraeus case). Mother Jones got it wrong.
Hillary shot someone ?!No, and I was talking about Hillary, you sexist pig-dog.
Wow, I’ve heard people accuse her of being a lying rapist enabler but now you say she shot somebody! You’re not talking about Vince Foster are you?
I have never heard anyone accuse Hilary of being a rapist. It might be the only thing she hasn’t been accused of.Hillary shot someone ?!
Wow, I’ve heard people accuse her of being a lying rapist enabler but now you say she shot somebody! You’re not talking about Vince Foster are you?
I'm quite used to not being in the majority on nearly
every issue, either in the side chosen, or in degree...
- Gun rights
- Anti-war
- More economic liberty
- Less government
- Pro environment
My values aren't based upon polling the masses.
I don't worship anything.
"Worship"....the non-religious context word of choice to demonize values of others.
Eloquently said.
But wrong.
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
I did not say you did. I specifically did not include you in my comment.
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
nope. The NRA has become a tool, and has long since lost any legitimate reason to exist. Even more so, now that it's literally money-washing for the Russians and Russian purchased GOP.
Back before the 1980s? It was useful. It was usurped by "lets drive up the price of guns and ammo though fake fear campaigns"
And it has been very successful.
I disagree.
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
So you *are* a worshiper of theirs? Okay. I was wrong. Who knew?
Many of us.
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
LMAO! Yet... you've never actually been the one to prove it so. Ain't you cute?
tytlyf
Not Religious
1.5% of Americans to be specific.
In a discussion forum, one rarely proves anything to one's opponents.
So proof is not my objective.
You're saying that about 5,000,000 Americastanians think he's wrong?
That's a whole lotta people!
tytlyf
Not Religious
And it's going lower. 5 million people is a tiny % of the population. As mentioned, there are tons more 2A supporters that despise the NRA than support it.
esmith
Veteran Member
Opinion or facts....I suspect opinion since there are no facts to backup your claim
The post was about something else entirely.