Most of the discussions I have read about scenarios of nuclear fallout seem to me lacking consideration for the effects on lifeforms besides humans. For example, some people have proposed a sci-fi-like scenario of building and inhabiting underground shelters and bunkers, or moving to areas less affected by the immediate effects of a nuclear strike.
But what about plants, non-human animals, insects, etc.? We need them to survive, and they're part of the life on this planet that we can't—or at least shouldn't, in my opinion—categorically view as mere collateral damage in our own wars. Even if we somehow managed to save ourselves from dying in a nuclear fallout, what would our life look like with mass destruction of other species?
When I think about the possibilities of what life would look like in such a scenario, sometimes I think I would rather catch the first nuke and head out in case of a nuclear war. I'm not sure that this is exactly how I would feel if that scenario ever became real (and I hope I never have to find out), but the idea isn't exactly appealing.
But what about plants, non-human animals, insects, etc.? We need them to survive, and they're part of the life on this planet that we can't—or at least shouldn't, in my opinion—categorically view as mere collateral damage in our own wars. Even if we somehow managed to save ourselves from dying in a nuclear fallout, what would our life look like with mass destruction of other species?
When I think about the possibilities of what life would look like in such a scenario, sometimes I think I would rather catch the first nuke and head out in case of a nuclear war. I'm not sure that this is exactly how I would feel if that scenario ever became real (and I hope I never have to find out), but the idea isn't exactly appealing.