Tumah
Veteran Member
Not the part about overthrowing the High Priest. The Messiah comes from the tribe of Judah, he can't sit in the High Priest's chair.That's exactly what a True Messiah does.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Not the part about overthrowing the High Priest. The Messiah comes from the tribe of Judah, he can't sit in the High Priest's chair.That's exactly what a True Messiah does.
There are denominations and Christians ( I being one ) who believe exactly what you attribute to "early Christians".,
From TIME magazine January 27, 2020 p24
According to current theology they got it all wrong. But why?."HEAVEN ON
.EARTHMany people think you
go to heaven when you
die, bu according to
N.T. Write, professor
of New Testament
and early Christianity
at the University of
St. Andrews, that's
not what the early
Christians believed
"The point was not for
us to 'go to heaven.'
but for the life of
heaven to arrive on
earth" he explains"
What do you think they understood that so skewed their belief?
.
.
Name them. How do you know this?There were many early Christian factions.. They didn't agree on anything.
You're right...I conflated the desires of the authors of the Dead Sea Scrolls, who opposed the then-current line of priests, with Jesus, who seems to have just wanted to return them to purity...Not the part about overthrowing the High Priest. The Messiah comes from the tribe of Judah, he can't sit in the High Priest's chair.
So, in your opinion. apparently based in deep theological reflection, what does the term Messiah mean?The Jews of Jesus's time quite understood the term "Messiah", even if later Christians don't.
Tom
Still don't.
Apparently. An interesting word to use in defining what Christ's followers believed. No, it isn't apparent. Christ had hundreds of followers, and He taught exactly how events were to unfold. So, your statement is simply unfounded.Before his death and resurrection, apparently none of his followers thought that he was going to die, arise and then come back sometime later. They expected him to live and to overthrow both the high priests and Romans and become King of the World.
That came later in Christian history though.Not so odd when you consider that the Jewish followers of Jesus believed that as the Messiah, he would usher in The Heavenly Kingdom, on Earth, in their lifetimes...
The Jews of Jesus's time quite understood the term "Messiah", even if later Christians don't.
Tom
Not so odd when you consider that the Jewish followers of Jesus believed that as the Messiah, he would usher in The Heavenly Kingdom, on Earth, in their lifetimes...
The Jews of Jesus's time quite understood the term "Messiah", even if later Christians don't.
Tom
Apparently. An interesting word to use in defining what Christ's followers believed. No, it isn't apparent. Christ had hundreds of followers, and He taught exactly how events were to unfold. So, your statement is simply unfounded.
I am always amused by those folk who seemingly have little grounding in the NT, pontificating about it, then giving likes and winners to one another.
The blind leading the blind.
Prove it.Early Christianity was marked by factions who couldn't agree on anything.
Prove it.
And I am always amused by those folk who seemingly have little grounding in the NT, pontificating about how anyone and everyone who disagrees with them must not know know anything about the NT (or the old, or the history of religion...) and therefore must be blind, and following the blind...I am always amused by those folk who seemingly have little grounding in the NT, pontificating about it, then giving likes and winners to one another.
The blind leading the blind.
But the Jewish elite of the day were, apparently, pretty thoroughly corrupted by the wealth and power that resulted from working with the Romans. The messiah wouldn't be high priest, but neither would the ones in office at the time, I suspect.Not the part about overthrowing the High Priest. The Messiah comes from the tribe of Judah, he can't sit in the High Priest's chair.
Obviously, there are RF members better able to explain. But the messiah was a human warrior king who'd save Judea from pagan oppressors, and return it to its rightful place as a top sovereign nation in the world.So, in your opinion. apparently based in deep theological reflection, what does the term Messiah mean?
But the Jewish elite of the day were, apparently, pretty thoroughly corrupted by the wealth and power that resulted from working with the Romans. The messiah wouldn't be high priest, but neither would the ones in office at the time, I suspect.
Obviously, there are RF members better able to explain. But the messiah was a human warrior king who'd save Judea from pagan oppressors, and return it to its rightful place as a top sovereign nation in the world.
Tom
,
From TIME magazine January 27, 2020 p24
According to current theology they got it all wrong. But why?."HEAVEN ON
.EARTHMany people think you
go to heaven when you
die, bu according to
N.T. Write, professor
of New Testament
and early Christianity
at the University of
St. Andrews, that's
not what the early
Christians believed
"The point was not for
us to 'go to heaven.'
but for the life of
heaven to arrive on
earth" he explains"
What do you think they understood that so skewed their belief?
.
.
Not so odd when you consider that the Jewish followers of Jesus believed that as the Messiah, he would usher in The Heavenly Kingdom, on Earth, in their lifetimes...
The Jewish Messiah was a man, not a god, so Jesus was not seen as god until later. Of course the Jews knew that Jesus was not Messiah.
If by elite you mean the king, perhaps. I'm not sure I've heard about any Jewish elite corrupted from power that came from working with the Romans.But the Jewish elite of the day were, apparently, pretty thoroughly corrupted by the wealth and power that resulted from working with the Romans.
I think the High Priesthood had already lost it's strength and meaning once it was kicked out of the Sanhedrin many years earlier.The messiah wouldn't be high priest, but neither would the ones in office at the time, I suspect.