• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Odd Belief Of Early Christians

shmogie

Well-Known Member
,

From TIME magazine January 27, 2020 p24


."HEAVEN ON
.EARTH
Many people think you
go to heaven when you
die, bu according to
N.T. Write, professor
of New Testament
and early Christianity
at the University of
St. Andrews, that's
not what the early
Christians believed

"The point was not for
us to 'go to heaven.'
but for the life of
heaven to arrive on
earth" he explains"
According to current theology they got it all wrong. But why?
What do you think they understood that so skewed their belief?

.

.
There are denominations and Christians ( I being one ) who believe exactly what you attribute to "early Christians".

Much of early Christianity has been corrupted by the Roman Catholic Church.
 

beenherebeforeagain

Rogue Animist
Premium Member
Not the part about overthrowing the High Priest. The Messiah comes from the tribe of Judah, he can't sit in the High Priest's chair.
You're right...I conflated the desires of the authors of the Dead Sea Scrolls, who opposed the then-current line of priests, with Jesus, who seems to have just wanted to return them to purity...
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
Still don't.
Before his death and resurrection, apparently none of his followers thought that he was going to die, arise and then come back sometime later. They expected him to live and to overthrow both the high priests and Romans and become King of the World.
Apparently. An interesting word to use in defining what Christ's followers believed. No, it isn't apparent. Christ had hundreds of followers, and He taught exactly how events were to unfold. So, your statement is simply unfounded.

I am always amused by those folk who seemingly have little grounding in the NT, pontificating about it, then giving likes and winners to one another.

The blind leading the blind.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
Apparently. An interesting word to use in defining what Christ's followers believed. No, it isn't apparent. Christ had hundreds of followers, and He taught exactly how events were to unfold. So, your statement is simply unfounded.

I am always amused by those folk who seemingly have little grounding in the NT, pontificating about it, then giving likes and winners to one another.

The blind leading the blind.

Early Christianity was marked by factions who couldn't agree on anything.
 

beenherebeforeagain

Rogue Animist
Premium Member
I am always amused by those folk who seemingly have little grounding in the NT, pontificating about it, then giving likes and winners to one another.

The blind leading the blind.
And I am always amused by those folk who seemingly have little grounding in the NT, pontificating about how anyone and everyone who disagrees with them must not know know anything about the NT (or the old, or the history of religion...) and therefore must be blind, and following the blind...:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Not the part about overthrowing the High Priest. The Messiah comes from the tribe of Judah, he can't sit in the High Priest's chair.
But the Jewish elite of the day were, apparently, pretty thoroughly corrupted by the wealth and power that resulted from working with the Romans. The messiah wouldn't be high priest, but neither would the ones in office at the time, I suspect.

So, in your opinion. apparently based in deep theological reflection, what does the term Messiah mean?
Obviously, there are RF members better able to explain. But the messiah was a human warrior king who'd save Judea from pagan oppressors, and return it to its rightful place as a top sovereign nation in the world.
Tom
 

sooda

Veteran Member
But the Jewish elite of the day were, apparently, pretty thoroughly corrupted by the wealth and power that resulted from working with the Romans. The messiah wouldn't be high priest, but neither would the ones in office at the time, I suspect.


Obviously, there are RF members better able to explain. But the messiah was a human warrior king who'd save Judea from pagan oppressors, and return it to its rightful place as a top sovereign nation in the world.
Tom

Jews of first century Palestine were tearing each other to pieces.. the Pharisees, Sadducees, Zealots, Sicarri, Herodians and Essenes didn't agree on anything.. They fought each other and the Romans.
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
,

From TIME magazine January 27, 2020 p24


."HEAVEN ON
.EARTH
Many people think you
go to heaven when you
die, bu according to
N.T. Write, professor
of New Testament
and early Christianity
at the University of
St. Andrews, that's
not what the early
Christians believed

"The point was not for
us to 'go to heaven.'
but for the life of
heaven to arrive on
earth" he explains"
According to current theology they got it all wrong. But why?
What do you think they understood that so skewed their belief?

.

.

Because their hope was frustrated, so they had to project them into the heavens eventually.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
Not so odd when you consider that the Jewish followers of Jesus believed that as the Messiah, he would usher in The Heavenly Kingdom, on Earth, in their lifetimes...

Well, it hits a snag with regard to prophecy.. Jesus was neither warrior nor king and he didn't defeat the Romans.
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
The Jewish Messiah was a man, not a god, so Jesus was not seen as god until later. Of course the Jews knew that Jesus was not Messiah.

In later eras, Messiah is semi-divine in Jewish literature. He is supposed to have been present at the creation of the world for instance.

R. Shim'on ben Laqish explained: "and the spirit of God hovered over the face of the water (Gen. 1:2) -- this is the spirit of King Messiah, as it is written And the spirit of the Lord will rest upon him (Isa. 11:2). By what merit will it [the spirit of the Messiah] come? ...by the merit of repentance." - Genesis Rabbah 2:4.​
 

Tumah

Veteran Member
But the Jewish elite of the day were, apparently, pretty thoroughly corrupted by the wealth and power that resulted from working with the Romans.
If by elite you mean the king, perhaps. I'm not sure I've heard about any Jewish elite corrupted from power that came from working with the Romans.

The messiah wouldn't be high priest, but neither would the ones in office at the time, I suspect.
I think the High Priesthood had already lost it's strength and meaning once it was kicked out of the Sanhedrin many years earlier.
 
Top