• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

On Being a Christian Horror Writer

DeepShadow

White Crow
"You might think the Twisting is a horror, that it turns men into monsters; most of us don't see it that way. Men are already the very worst kind of monsters, George. Out there, in your world, true evils lurk in innocent guises, hiding their blackened and venomous hearts behind pretty faces and pleasing smiles. Here in the Carnival, Isolde has made everyone equal, and everyone honest." Tindal--Carnival

Why I Write...What I Write....

I'm pretty open about my religious beliefs, and more often than not people are surprised and even confused to find that a writer who professes such a firm belief in the Gospel of Jesus Christ would write anything resembling gothic horror. Until people pointed it out to me, I never saw any contradiction or conflict in these two aspects of my life, but as my career as a writer has been picking up, I get more and more of these funny looks, so I figure I had better explain myself. This essay is as much for my own sake as for anyone who might read it, as I doubt I've heard the last on this topic, and I hope to have better answers prepared when it comes up again.

Perhaps it's best to start with why I write anything at all. I don't fully understand it myself, but spinning stories has always made me happy, and suppressing my urge to create them has always made me miserable. It's an outlet for feelings that are hard to express conversationally; if I could express them in a few words, I wouldn't waste time writing a lengthy parable! Being a Christian, it would make sense that most of these feelings center on internal issues--immortality, good vs. evil, the nature of the soul, etc. One way I focus on such issues is by removing other things the reader might identify with, a technique that lends itslef naturally to fantasy and science fiction. Consider the following passage from J.R.R. Tolkien's The Hobbit, as the title character is scouting out a dragon's cave:

"A sound...began to throb in his ears, a sort of bubbling like the noise of a large pot galloping on the fire, mixed with the rumble as of a gigantic tom-cat purring. This grew to the unmistakable gurgling noise of some vast animal snoring in its sleep down there in the red glow in front of him.

"It was at this point that Bilbo stopped. Going on from there was the bravest thing he ever did. The tremendous things that happened afterwards were as nothing compared to it. He fought the real battle in the tunnel alone, before he ever saw the vast danger that lay in wait."
The character is a fictional member of a fictional race, walking through a tunnel that was never carved through a mountain which never existed. He's on his way to face a fire-breathing dragon--a mythical creature--to deliver the dragon's hoard into the hands of dwarves--yet another race of mythical beings. His circumstances in their most literal form have only the thinnest comparison to any real experience the reader might have. But don't you identify with his feelings? Haven't you ever been in a situation where you asked yourself 'What am I doing here?!' Have you ever wanted to turn back so bad you were practically fighting a battle with yourself? I have, and that's what touches me whenever I read that passage.

"Okay, But Why Horror?"

Over the past few years, fantasy literature has become increasingly disappointing to me. A few years back my wife and I were reading a fantasy book that remained mediocre despite engaging characters, demonic villains, dashing heroism, and terrible disasters. With all manner of demons wreaking their havoc on the "army of good" in a climactic battle, my wife sighed and said, "Wouldn't it be nice if the worst a demon could do is kill you."

This, we realized, was the core problem of the book: the looming threat that everyone was trying to prevent was death, and as a Christian, death just doesn't scare me like it used to! More and more fantasy stories are about people trying to save their lives rather than live them. There are always the wonderful exceptions, such as the Lord of the Rings, but people often refer to these exeptions as "dark fantasy." Although I accept this label for the sake of conversation, I've never quite understood it. By the same token, when I write fantasy, people invariably comment on the "darkness" of the tone. They are entitled to their opinion, but I believe this supposed "darkness" is only the shadow-side of the responsibility we all have to ourselves and our fellow-men.

The truth is, the fantasy genre is becoming the escapist umbrella that critics have long accused it of being. Writing that might cause the reader to look within himself for faults is rejected as "dark." The "heroes" of the fantasy genre concern themselves more with preserving life than with making it worth living. The "monsters" of fantasy are less and less a mirror of humanity's evils. Instead, they have become a safe way to have the "heroes" show off their muscles while remaining morally uncomplicated. After all, these are monsters, not human beings; they were born evil, and they are never going to change. How convenient. Even worse, the "monsters" of fantasy are more and more used to separate mankind from evil. If something evil happened, a monster is always at fault, rather than a human being. Human beings don't do things like that!

Of course, people are free to write what they want, but I strongly believe that reducing monsters into punching bags for the all-good humans will fail to satisfy the very need for which most readers turn to these works, and lately the fan base seems to be agreeing with me. Those in the Christian community who voice concerns about the rise of horror fantasy in modern culture might do well to take a better look at the works they find symptomatic of moral decline. A guide to one wildly popular fantasy horror TV series points out that the show's brilliance "...is not it's ingenious mythology, wonderful as it may be. Rather, it is the way the menacing creatures of legend mirror the monsters that mere human beings must face each day."

Readers of the horror genre enter the experience expecting a story that pulls no punches, that pushes boundaries, and upsets them, even if it's only at the most superficial level. Fantasy readers aren't always expecting this, and some of them make no bones about their low level of tolerance for the main character's suffering. The very world "tolerance" suggests they see this as a chore to be endured, rather than a learning experience to be cherished. What's to cherish in reading about someone's suffering? How about cherishing the fact that you don't have to go through it! The reader has the luxury of closing the book (or turning off the TV, as the case may be), collecting wits, and otherwise rejuvenating before heading back into the dungeon or the gauntlet. This places the reader in a better position to learn from these experiences than if he or she were actually living them, and that learning experience ought to be cherished.

Even in horror, not all writers would agree with my style. Many focus more on the horrors of the murderer outside your house trying to get in than on the murderer inside your heart trying to get out. Let others write what they will, and I say God bless them for it. As for me, I write what I write, and I can only hope it touches someone somewhere as deeply as writing it has touched me.
 

Unedited

Active Member
After reading your post, I'd really like to know, if you'd be willing to say, what specific books and authors you do like.

As I read through your post, I keep going back between whether or not I agree with you, but I think for the most part, I do. The last horror book I read was about a young woman who'd been in an abusive relationship. She'd gotten free of the relationship, but was still deeply wounded from it. On the surface, the book was about her fight against a psychopath that had become entranced by her. In the end, however, when she fights him, it's more about her finally fighting back, instead of just laying down and letting people walk all over her. At least that's what I got from it. So, does that sound like the kind of book you like, or did I miss your point?
 

DeepShadow

White Crow
Unedited, that sounds like exactly the kind of book I'd like. The real struggle is on the inside, mirrored in an external physical struggle. Sounds perfect!

I think you've grasped my point quite well, and I'm glad, because I was struggling to write that, and I'm sure it could be clearer. If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. Perhaps in my answers I'll find parts of the essay that need to be revised.
 

DeepShadow

White Crow
Unedited said:
After reading your post, I'd really like to know, if you'd be willing to say, what specific books and authors you do like.
Sorry I missed this part before!

The first one in my mind is J.K. Rowling. Her grasp of the emotional stakes and her ability to make your sympathize with her characters is incredible. Even her villains have enough sympathy to make them believable, which is remarkable considering the small amount of wordage she dedicates to describing them. Of course, part of how she accomplishes this is through describing the world around the villain, and the villain gets fleshed out simply by association. That's one technique I'll be trying my best to borrow from her.

Tolkein will always have my praise, of course, for his incredible use of "eucatastrope," the sudden and unexpected change for the better. literary technique wherein victory is not only snatched from the jaws of defeat, but oftentime comes through the very thing the reader expects to kill a person (or a village, or a nation, or a world)! I could talk a long time about the amazing uses and types of of eucatastrophe in Tolkein's works, and I've found it creeps into my own works even when I'm not looking.

Sure, I have a few issues with Tolkein's writings, but they are stylistic only; as far as I'm concerned, he grasped the issues that I describe above, as did Heinlein, Zelazny, Asimov, and Andre Norton. Madeline l'Engle, Jane Yolen, and many others seem to grasp these concepts in what I've read of their works. I'll always have a soft spot for David Eddings, but I read his later works with more and more grains of salt. Likewise, I've always had a love-hate relationship with Orson Scott Card, but I have to give him his due: he writes well, and he treats his characters with the honesty I talk about above. (For the record, my essay was inspired by several of his, from his collection Storyteller in Zion. Card is, in case you didn't know, a Latter-Day-Saint, as am I.)

Within the last twenty years or so, I can think of two authors besides Rowling who have consistently done exceptional work, both stylistically and in their treatment of the human issues I address above. Terry Brooks and R.A. Salvatore are both phenomenal in the depth of their issues, and I heartily recommend them to everyone.

Unedited, you mentioned a psychopath in the latest horror book you've read, and I didn't realize till later that we had only addressed one side of the issues I discussed above. How was the villain portrayed? Was he a two-dimensional, "oh, he's just crazy, doing what crazy people do" kind of psychopath? Because that would fall into the same category as "monsters" above, IMHO. I hate seeing mental illness depicted this way.:149:
 

Unedited

Active Member
DeepShadow said:
Sorry I missed this part before!
That's fine! Thank you for coming back to name them. You listed a few I've never heard of before, so I'll have to go find some of their works to read.

As for the psychopath, I don't think he was an, "Oh, he's just crazy" kind of psychopath. In the book, each chapter was done from a different person's point of view (I know there's a term for that, but I can't remember it right now). What I really liked, is that when it was written from his point of view, you almost got the feeling that what he was doing was completely normal, that he wasn't crazy at all. I mean, you can't read about him kill a man and think he's completely sane, but when he walks lazily back to the bus after murdering someone, all upset that having to kill that man cut into his plans for the day, it gives you the feeling that he is.

He suffers from heavy delusions, and although most of the dealings with inner struggle come from the main character's point of view, he too struggles a few times when his delusions are shattered.
 

DeepShadow

White Crow
Sounds excellent! :jiggy: Now I've got to know the name of the book!:149:

Looking through my list above, I now realize that it doesn't include any horror writing! Maybe after I read that book we can discuss it, and see if I'll add it to my list.
 
Top