The theories of Evolution and Creation stem from two world views; two different philosophies. Evolution is modeled after a more random philosophy of the universe. Creation is more based on a more rational and deterministic philosophy of the universe. Each are custom fitted to each philosophy and not other way around. We then see what we expect to see, based on which philosophical bias we share.
Evolution does not create. Rather its creations are more of a random byproduct. The Old man in the Mountain was not the goal of million years of erosion. Rather the semblance of an old man's head was a coincidence. That fits the black box mentality. Creation is something that humans do in a deliberate way. If I needed a place to live, I can build a house and thereby create a shelter; deliberate action with a goal in mind. I do not have to wait for nature, via a coincidence, to tunnel out a cave for me to find. The random philosophy does more conjuring; odds makers, while the rational philosophy does more creating. A deterministic God, or belief thereof, is a platform for reason and logic; deliberate action to a goal. It is not about waiting for random event to align with my needs, so I can eat. I need to create a deliberate plan with logic.
The main problem with the random approach is, it is grounded on human creations and not naturally random things. For example, dice are man made and are designed in a way that is not like nature. A six sided dice is designed to be equally weighed on all sides, so when thrown the same odds appear for each side. Dice were created that way as part for a gambling game from ancient times. Atoms, on the other hand, have all their sides different; layered as different energy levels. Those natural dice are not homogenized, so molecules can form just as easy with inner or outer orbital electrons. They are loaded so the outcomes of chemical reaction are more predictable and rational. Dice are part of an invented/created human game of chance, and became the foundation for a form of science, used to model a random philosophy of the universe.
Playing cards, another human creation, allows for a large number of combinations, the odds of which can be calculated. This is because they are all created with the same physical size and weight, but are only different in terms of their subjective markings, which is totally arbitrary. Subjectivity is closer to random, which is why it was created that way. People create their own reality.
We have two main political parties, each with a different world view, with both looking at the same data, but each forming different conclusions. How is that possible? It depends whether you try to be objective to the data, or whether the subjectivity of face cards matters more; racism and DEI. In my experience, the Left tends to be more subjective; emotional thinkers, and therefore tend to gravitate to a random model of evolution. Gender is now a new deck of cards. Does anyone know how many cards in that new deck? Pick a card!
For example, Socialism has been tried before, with some limited success but also some epic failures. From the random mind, the next time can be the charm. Evolution creates things the same way; new species or replicators appear. The Creationist who has to create something; build a bridge, knows random takes too long and cannot be aimed very well. It is better for games. Hoping this time will be different is not good enough. You need more of a logical plan; cause and effect, so it ends up as was needed in reasonable time. Creationism, ironically, actually helped the human brain be more like God, and learn to have plan with a casual philosophy; image of God. The speed of creation; 6 days, suggest find the fastest path for your human creation, and that will be the most logical; simplicity is perfection.
