A new German study has found that about a third of society (35%) is indifferent to whether or not they are living meaningful lives.
According to the article:
What do you make of this news?
According to the article:
Tatjana Schnell, a research psychologist at the University of Innsbruck in Austria, surveyed perceived meaningfulness in a modern population [of Germans].
Participants were surveyed using the SoMe scale, which measures people on a scale from those who believe they have a total lack of meaning in their lives to those who feel their lives are full of meaning, and breaks down individuals into four groups. Schnell categorizes people in this way:
The meaningfulness value is based upon ones appraisal of life as coherent, significant, directed, and belonging. The crisis of meaning variable measures absence or presence of suffering drawn from meaninglessness.
Looking at a sample of 603 Germans, Schnell found that 61 percent were meaningful, 4 percent suffered a crisis of meaning, and 35 percent were existentially indifferent, those who neither experience their lives as meaningful nor suffer from this lack of meaning. So of the people who felt their lives lacked meaning, it really only bothered one in 10 of them.
The academics identified 26 sources of meaning in their study, and noted that the indifferent lacked sources like love, social commitment and unison of nature. They were especially low in self-knowledge, spirituality, explicit religiosity and generativity, even compared to those in a crisis.
Schnell stresses the low self-awareness among the apathetic. They do not face their own personal strengths and weaknesses because they are of little importance to them. Exceedingly little energy is invested in reflecting on themselves, their needs and motives.
Participants were surveyed using the SoMe scale, which measures people on a scale from those who believe they have a total lack of meaning in their lives to those who feel their lives are full of meaning, and breaks down individuals into four groups. Schnell categorizes people in this way:
High meaningfulness, low crisis of meaning (meaningful)
Low meaningfulness, low crisis of meaning (existentially indifferent)
High meaningfulness, high crisis of meaning (conflicting)
Low meaningfulness, high crisis of meaning (crisis of meaning)
Low meaningfulness, low crisis of meaning (existentially indifferent)
High meaningfulness, high crisis of meaning (conflicting)
Low meaningfulness, high crisis of meaning (crisis of meaning)
The meaningfulness value is based upon ones appraisal of life as coherent, significant, directed, and belonging. The crisis of meaning variable measures absence or presence of suffering drawn from meaninglessness.
Looking at a sample of 603 Germans, Schnell found that 61 percent were meaningful, 4 percent suffered a crisis of meaning, and 35 percent were existentially indifferent, those who neither experience their lives as meaningful nor suffer from this lack of meaning. So of the people who felt their lives lacked meaning, it really only bothered one in 10 of them.
The academics identified 26 sources of meaning in their study, and noted that the indifferent lacked sources like love, social commitment and unison of nature. They were especially low in self-knowledge, spirituality, explicit religiosity and generativity, even compared to those in a crisis.
Schnell stresses the low self-awareness among the apathetic. They do not face their own personal strengths and weaknesses because they are of little importance to them. Exceedingly little energy is invested in reflecting on themselves, their needs and motives.
What do you make of this news?