One woman's opinion of what steps we need to take to avoid a Ukraine-like situation in the future

[Truthseeker]

She also says this: You may also find the following book thought-provoking and illuminating: "Building a World Federation: The Key to Resolving Our Global Crises" that lays out a roadmap for next steps. It is available on Amazon wherever you are. You can read it in 45 minutes.

I note however, it is 146 long. I am a slow reader and could never read it in 45 minutes

The video is about 35 minutes long.

Editing much later for future readers of this. This is one set of ideas for what to do about future conflict. What are your ideas to do this or to further develop the system she laid out? What she said here is not her complete ideas, just a sketch of it, I might add.

We need to put our heads together to further each other's understanding.

 

[exchemist]

She also says this: You may also find the following book thought-provoking and illuminating: "Building a World Federation: The Key to Resolving Our Global Crises" that lays out a roadmap for next steps. It is available on Amazon wherever you are. You can read it in 45 minutes.

I note however, it is 146 long. I am a slow reader and could never read it in 45 minutes

The video is about 35 minutes long.

Why would this woman's opinions be worth listening to? Who is she?

 

[Twilight Hue]

Looks like she was watching too much Star Trek Federation movies.

Not to mention plugging a book for herself. That's a definite red flag.

I have no desire to listen to a half hour infomercial of her shilling a book in attempt to make herself money with Amazon.

 

[PureX]

I think we need to resolve the fundamental problem of governance before we try to make it a global system.

 

[Truthseeker]

Why would this woman's opinions be worth listening to? Who is she?

I don't think I did a good job starting this thread. This is not a debate section, so what we should be doing after I presented this view, which I agree with, is get other people's ideas on what should be done to prevent conflicts like this in the future. We can learn from each other.

You should listen to what she has to say, because she has spent years thinking about this problem. She's a lawyer with international experience. You can have your owns ideas of course which will add to our understanding. I don't want to debate.

 

[Truthseeker]

Looks like she was watching too much Star Trek Federation movies.

Not to mention plugging a book for herself. That's a definite red flag.

I have no desire to listen to a half hour infomercial of her shilling a book in attempt to make herself money with Amazon.

I guess this thread is not for you. I started this thread wrong. This is not a debate thread. I will not debate her motivations. What ideas to you have for preventing war in the future? That's what we should be doing here, exchanging ideas about how to do that. If you don't want to listen to others because you are doubting their motives before you have even heard from them, then I repeat this thread is not for you.

We should be learning from each other. I used the wrong approach in starting this thread. I apologize.

 

[Truthseeker]

I think we need to resolve the fundamental problem of governance before we try to make it a global system.

That's what we need here, an exchange of ideas. Thank you!

What fundamental problems of government do you see that we need to address before we try to construct a global system? I respect your opinion around here.

 

[Twilight Hue]

I guess this thread is not for you. I started this thread wrong. This is not a debate thread. I will not debate her motivations. What ideas to you have for preventing war in the future? That's what we should be doing here, exchanging ideas about how to do that. If you don't want to listen to others because you are doubting their motives before you have even heard from them, then I repeat this thread is not for you.

We should be learning from each other. I used the wrong approach in starting this thread. I apologize.

It's not the subject itself. I just don't like people who use things like this just to shill and advertise products.

I'll bow out of course as I don't have a horse in this particular race. :0)

 

[Truthseeker]

It's not the subject itself. I just don't like people who use things like this just to shill and advertise products.

I'll bow out of course as I don't have a horse in this particular race. :0)

Well you are making a premature judgement in ignorance about her. This is not a debate thread, but feel I should point that out.

 

[Trailblazer]

Well you are making a premature judgement in ignorance about her. This is not a debate thread, but feel I should point that out.

I like your new signature:
Non-debating member when I can help myself.

 

[Twilight Hue]

Well you are making a premature judgement in ignorance about her. This is not a debate thread, but feel I should point that out.

All I see is an infomercial.

Even if she is knowledgeable, then just keep on the subject alone without that need to advertise and shill which put her true motivations in question.

It's how I read it.

 

[Truthseeker]

I like your new signature:
Non-debating member when I can help myself.

Okay, okay. I get it.

 

[Truthseeker]

All I see is an infomercial.

Even if she is knowledgeable, then just keep on the subject alone without that need to advertise and shill which put her true motivations in question.

It's how I read it.

Okay, you are leaving and I shouldn't have said anything after that.

 

[Trailblazer]

All I see is an infomercial.

For the Baha'i Faith.
Why does she not just say that?

 

[PureX]

That's what we need here, an exchange of ideas. Thank you!

What fundamental problems of government do you see that we need to address before we try to construct a global system? I respect your opinion around here.

We need to figure out how to stop the people that want to control the world from ever gaining that ability, through government, military, religion or technology; … the very people that want it most, and will work relentlessly to get it. The people that want most to ‘be in charge’ of us are the very people we need to make sure never are.

For some reason we humans still have not gotten this into our heads, and we keep allowing the worst among us to gain control. Just because they want it the most and will do whatever it takes to get it. And then they always abuse it and cause great suffering for everyone else.

Also, democracy is just mob rule. It can’t be the method we use for making important decisions. Those need to be based on unassailable principals that are spelled out clearly and strictly enforced.

 

[rational experiences]

Life continuance consciously is with the human female.

Nurturing her babies as a mother is innate spiritual.

As a mother I would care for any sisters baby or child as my own.

A true mother's instinct for human survival.

Once I tried to write a book. A spiritual book. But I couldn't choose the subject I thought would own enough correlated advice to be heeded.

Which is a modern day dilemma.

Teachers of old verbalised their teachings. Only after a huge earth attack was the documented separate advices by various written authors correlated.

The theme in science time shifting. Hence so does consciousness as biology time shifts out of DNAs presence.

So genesis and exodus exists together in the same moment.

My sister is not a shill. She is a human owning varied DNA. She was a baby and a child like us all.

She owns a story.

When positive thought upon humans give their stories we are correlating a new living life sacrificed holy book of warnings.

Only ever given by living humans to prevent world destruction.

We all own ideas. We sit at the table claiming last days sharing the advice of sacrificed world nations families.

Don't you see the warning is exact?

 

[Heyo]

For the Baha'i Faith.
Why does she not just say that?

Rule #8.

 

[Trailblazer]

Rule #8.

I said: Why does she not just say that?
Rule #8 does not apply to the woman in the video.

 

[Heyo]

I said: Why does she not just say that?
Rule #8 does not apply to the woman in the video.

It applies to the OP. If s/he had selected a proselytising video, it would had been against rule #8.

 

[Truthseeker]

For the Baha'i Faith.
Why does she not just say that?

A little inaccurate, for world peace.