The definition of mechanical neutral PC solving: the way to get solution must be logical. But God is not a source of absurd. Hence, it has to be P=NP. And indeed, I have proven the most complicated Riemann Hypothesis in just one page! As well as the abc conjecture in one page. Hence, it has to be P=NP.
You have NOT proven the Riemann Hypothesis, and there is absolutely no relationship to the knowledge of science as you specifically described. Please present your proof and how it has any relevance to the evolving knowledge of science. As in the reference the Reimann Hypothesis is not subject to proof, but subject to conjecture and opinion. Even though ;likely true it have not been proven.
Riemann hypothesis - Wikipedia
In mathematics, the
Riemann hypothesis is a
conjecture that the
Riemann zeta function has its
zeros only at the negative even integers and
complex numbers with
real part 1/2. Many consider it to be the most important
unsolved problem in
pure mathematics.
[1] It is of great interest in
number theory because it implies results about the distribution of
prime numbers. It was proposed by
Bernhard Riemann (
1859), after whom it is named.
The Riemann hypothesis and some of its generalizations, along with
Goldbach's conjecture and the
twin prime conjecture, make up
Hilbert's eighth problem in
David Hilbert's list of
23 unsolved problems; it is also one of the
Clay Mathematics Institute's Millennium Prize Problems, which offers a million dollars to anyone who solves them. The name is also used for some closely related analogues, such as the
Riemann hypothesis for curves over finite fields.
The Riemann zeta function ζ(
s) is a
function whose
argument s may be any complex number other than 1, and whose values are also complex. It has zeros at the negative even integers; that is, ζ(
s) = 0 when
s is one of −2, −4, −6, .... These are called its
trivial zeros. The zeta function is also zero for other values of
s, which are called
nontrivial zeros. The Riemann hypothesis is concerned with the locations of these nontrivial zeros, and states that:
The real part of every nontrivial zero of the Riemann zeta function is 1/2.
Thus, if the hypothesis is correct, all the nontrivial zeros lie on the critical line consisting of the complex numbers 1/2 +
i t, where
t is a
real number and
i is the
imaginary unit.
I believe in God and yes God is not the source of the absurd, but because of the fallible nature of humans the diverse conflicting and contradictory beliefs of humans concerning religion are nost often wrong and no relationship to the knowledge of science,
Mathematical papers about the Riemann hypothesis tend to be cautiously noncommittal about its truth. Of authors who express an opinion, most of them, such as Riemann (1859) and Bombieri (2000), imply that they expect (or at least hope) that it is true. The few authors who express serious doubt about it include Ivić (2008), who lists some reasons for skepticism, and Littlewood (1962), who flatly states that he believes it false, that there is no evidence for it and no imaginable reason it would be true. The consensus of the survey articles (Bombieri 2000, Conrey 2003, and Sarnak 2005) is that the evidence for it is strong but not overwhelming, so that while it is probably true there is reasonable doubt."
The computer concept of P=NP (?) nor the Reimann Hypothesis have any relationship to the knowledge of science based on Methodological Naturalism.
Again math and computers are tools of science and do not in and of themselves determine the knowledge of Methodological Naturalism. You have failed to justify your claim.
Please describe in detail the relationship you propose as applied to science. So far you have not provided a coherent argument.
