So?Because teens are awkward and typically horny. Duh
She can teach kids about female anatomy, so they will have the chance to see first-hand.
lol
I am kidding of course.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So?Because teens are awkward and typically horny. Duh
I’m sure many would prefer a more “practical lesson” from herSo?
She can teach kids about female anatomy, so they will have the chance to see first-hand.
lol
I am kidding of course.
I agree that it's a pity but those books are easily available to just about anyone. I read them outside of school.
It depends on what was being taught.Why?
That should raise the ire of bald spotty psychos with balls like shriveled raisins. I'll bet they are calling a lawyer right now for discrimination!The book is a sex-ed book. It has illustrations, but they do not appear to be any worse than what one would get in a heterosexual sex ed course and that is often taught to sixth graders. This class a appears to be for students a couple of years older.
Here is an image that I found. Not to worry, it has been pre-blurred:
View attachment 77236
Also it is rather highly rated as several sources including Amazon where it has a 4.8 out of 5 rating:
Amazon.com: This Book Is Gay: 9781492617839: Dawson, Juno, Levithan, David: Books
Amazon.com: This Book Is Gay: 9781492617839: Dawson, Juno, Levithan, David: Bookswww.amazon.com
And then there is this. At first I thought that it might be an article from a hater, but this shows how the book teaches rather honestly. This part of the book is on why a gay person should not use steroids to look more masculine as some do:
View attachment 77237
But that is what they like about him most. They just don't say that out loud.The MAGA Pubs seem to be hell bent on using Gestapo-like tactics, but then we need to remember that their superhero is clearly a neo-fascist who deifies money and power.
At the high school I graduated from, a few years later a young female teacher was fired because she often sat on her desk wearing a short skirt and no panties. My guess is she didn't have to worry about the boys not paying attention, I betcha!Surely. It's also part of the biology curriculum. But I would like a teacher with these female characteristics to teach the junior high boys.
I bet it was the female students who snitched on her.At the high school I graduated from, a few years later a young female teacher was fired because she often sat on her desk wearing a short skirt and no panties. My guess is she didn't have to worry about the boys not paying attention, I betcha!
Anthropologist Desmond Morris back in the mid 60's wrote a book entitled "The Naked Ape", and if on studies chimp behavior we share a lot of their both physical and social characteristics, including an admiration and/or fear of alpha males.But that is what they like about him most. They just don't say that out loud.
Good question, but I don't know. My sister was in one of her classes and was the first to inform me of her. I don't think she was much appalled but was surprised.I bet it was the female students who snitched on her.
Right?
Well, Communists and Marxists did come to hate the fascists.The MAGA Pubs seem to be hell bent on using Gestapo-like tactics, but then we need to remember that their superhero is clearly a neo-fascist who deifies money and power.
That's a lazy bull**** reason to discriminate. That's like saying we shouldn't build access ramps for people in wheelchairs just because they're in the minority. There's no rational reason to shelter children from life's realities. Keeping children ignorant simply for the sake of religious, superstitious garbage is detrimental to their developmemt.In democracy, majority wins, I guess.
They also breathed air, so hold your breath so you don't become one.Well, Communists and Marxists did come to hate the fascists.
In school an educator should tell all pupils: homosexuality and bisexuality are as normal as heterosexuality.That's a lazy bull**** reason to discriminate. That's like saying we shouldn't build access ramps for people in wheelchairs just because they're in the minority. There's no rational reason to shelter children from life's realities. Keeping children ignorant simply for the sake of religious, superstitious garbage is detrimental to their developmemt.
May I ask, where did you get this from?But what is happening is that some priests of wokeism are pushing educators to tell children: homosexuality is cooler, it's much better to be a LGBT than to be outside of that spectrum.
What a preposterous, imbecilic accusation.But what is happening is that some priests of wokeism are pushing educators to tell children: homosexuality is cooler, it's much better to be a LGBT than to be outside of that spectrum.
It's just a mindless asspull, either their own or one regurgitated from RW propaganda.May I ask, where did you get this from?
I was going to ask the same thing. But I do not expect an answer. For some reason she claimed that the little bit of the book that I posted made it "worse than I thought" and I never go an answer for "Why?" to that question.May I ask, where did you get this from?
I am still waiting with what was wrong with the book? What facts were wrong? Where was it too overt?