• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Pelosi Commits an Act of Hypocrisy, Trump Commits a Felony -- America Focuses on Pelosi

Deidre

Well-Known Member
I think it depends on the news outlet we're getting our information from. Liberal outlets are always bashing Trump, and in this case, the news seems pretty even on both sides. (from liberal/conservative outlets comparatively) I just want to hear facts, but those are hard to come by these days.

If you're speaking about his voting twice comment as the ''felony,'' it was pointed out in another thread that what he meant was if you vote by mail and it isn't counted, then go vote in person. (hence, voting ''twice,'' but not having the vote count twice) He wasn't suggesting to have one voter's vote count twice. I'm just reporting what I've read, don't shoot the messenger. ;)
 
Last edited:

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I'm beginning to like Pelosi. Shows underneath that witchy persona, she is sick of the masks as well.

She's a closet anti masker. Good for her.
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
Are you really laughing at a felony conviction?

If a mail-in vote hasn't been tabulated, then you are allowed to vote in person. All that happens is your mail-in vote will not be counted later.

Apparently there are electronic "poll books" that are updated in real time, that can tell you if your mail in vote has been tabulated or not. If it hasn't been, then that means your vote won't be calculated in the prediction models on TV unless you vote in person.
 
Last edited:

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
I'm not going into detail about what Ms. Pelosi and Mr. Trump did within just this past few days because precisely what they did is not the topic of this thread. The topic of this thread is why is Ms. Pelosi getting all the attention when Mr. Trump seems to have committed the greater transgression? Is it because American's are far more scandalized by what someone who does not routinely flaunt the rules does than they are by someone who daily flaunts the rules?

Whatever the case, this is a sign we're screwed.

It's bizarre that Pelosi is slammed when she takes off her mask in a salon to have her hair washed, but Trump and Pence were seen multiple times without a mask...Pence one in a HOSPITAL FULL OF SICK PEOPLE and the same people who would attack Pelosi didn't say a word.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It's bizarre that Pelosi is slammed when she takes off her mask in a salon to have her hair washed, but Trump and Pence were seen multiple times without a mask...Pence one in a HOSPITAL FULL OF SICK PEOPLE and the same people who would attack Pelosi didn't say a word.
I don't think taking off her mask when useful for hair service
is the problem here. I see 2....
- Getting salon access that isn't legal for the masses.
- Blaming the owner, subjecting her to threats of violence.
 

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
I don't think taking off her mask when useful for hair service
is the problem here. I see 2....
- Getting salon access that isn't legal for the masses.
- Blaming the owner, subjecting her to threats of violence.

I only saw people complaining about the mask. so salons were not allowed to open in that state? If so, then I can see the issue. But what about the owner that decided to break the law. did Pelosi hold a gun on her until she opened it?
 

BSM1

What? Me worry?
Trump's suggestion of verifying one's vote was counted
strikes me as dumb & ill considered rather than felonious.
And trust me...I know felonies...well, just one (that I know of).


I still think you're missing the point. If I'm not mistaken your mail-in ballot has to reach the Registrar before a certain date. This is why you have to mail it by a certain time. When your ballot is received, you are, in effect, removed from the voter roll. If you show up on voting day and your name is still there, then the Registrar did not receive your mail-in ballot. If you vote in person your name, again, is taken off the active register so even if your ballot comes in late, it will not be counted. Dumb? Hardly.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I only saw people complaining about the mask. so salons were not allowed to open in that state? If so, then I can see the issue. But what about the owner that decided to break the law. did Pelosi hold a gun on her until she opened it?
The owner denies Pelosi's claims.
A stylist contractor (who rents a chair from the
owner) appears to have handled the service.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I still think you're missing the point. If I'm not mistaken your mail-in ballot has to reach the Registrar before a certain date. This is why you have to mail it by a certain time. When your ballot is received, you are, in effect, removed from the voter roll. If you show up on voting day and your name is still there, then the Registrar did not receive your mail-in ballot. If you vote in person your name, again, is taken off the active register so even if your ballot comes in late, it will not be counted. Dumb? Hardly.
I've heard that ballots will be counted well after the
in-person voting. But I'm no expert on this.
 

BSM1

What? Me worry?
I've heard that ballots will be counted well after the
in-person voting. But I'm no expert on this.


Only if you are still listed on the active register. If you voted in person, your mail-in would be null and void. If this wasn't the case, this whole exercise would be moot.

BTW, receiving the mail-in ballot is not the same as counting the ballot as a vote. It just means your ballot has been received and may be pending.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Only if you are still listed on the active register. If you voted in person, your mail-in would be null and void. If this wasn't the case, this whole exercise would be moot.

BTW, receiving the mail-in ballot is not the same as counting the ballot as a vote. It just means your ballot has been received and may be pending.
It's all too complex for me.
I'm gonna vote by mail, & just assume that Jorgensen will lose.
 
Top