Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Perrenialism has some basis, I think. Constructivism has some merit as well.
The way I see it, the mystical experience has a common core, but our interpretations of it vary by culture and individual.
somewhat like the jain parable and the 10 blind men trying to explain an elephant?
Maybe. But perhaps more like a Hindu will most likely put a Hindu spin on the experience, while a Christian will most likely put a Christian spin on it, and so forth.
As a pluralist, perenialism is something of a dirty word to me. Here we have this wonderful cultural diversity and the perenialist would have us explain it away and underwrite it. No thanks.
As a pluralist, perenialism is something of a dirty word to me. Here we have this wonderful cultural diversity and the perenialist would have us explain it away and underwrite it. No thanks.
I looked up the word and found that it does not apply to religion since it's an educational philosophy.
They are Perennialism, Essentialism, Progressivism, and Reconstructionism. These educational philosophies focus heavily on WHAT we should teach, the curriculum aspect. Perennialism. For Perennialists, the aim of education is to ensure that students acquire understandings about the great ideas of Western civilization.
https://oregonstate.edu/instruct/ed416/PP3.html
Hmm. My internet searching did not turn up that alternative meaning. "Google fail" on my part.Like most words, perennialism has more than one meaning. In the philosophy of religion, perennialism refers to the notion that there is a core mystical experience which is cross-cultural and can be found through-out human history. Aldous Huxley coined the usage in 1945 with his book, "The Perennial Philosophy".
The opposing view to perennialism is the notion that the content of mystical experiences is constructed -- influenced, shaped, determined -- by one's culture. This is called, "constructivism".
Perennialism once had a much greater following among scholars than it does today. Today, the majority position seems to be hard or soft constructivism.
I myself subscribe to a combination of perennial and constructivist views seasoned with a dash of my own lunacy -- and I'm almost always right about these things, excepting only when I'm wrong about them.
Hmm. My internet searching did not turn up that alternative meaning. "Google fail" on my part.
I looked up the word and found that it does not apply to religion since it's an educational philosophy.
They are Perennialism, Essentialism, Progressivism, and Reconstructionism. These educational philosophies focus heavily on WHAT we should teach, the curriculum aspect. Perennialism. For Perennialists, the aim of education is to ensure that students acquire understandings about the great ideas of Western civilization.
https://oregonstate.edu/instruct/ed416/PP3.html
As a pluralist, perenialism is something of a dirty word to me. Here we have this wonderful cultural diversity and the perenialist would have us explain it away and underwrite it. No thanks.