• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Petition to Change the Frubal System!

Should the rules be updated?

  • Yes, the rule should be updated.

    Votes: 3 27.3%

  • No, the rules should not be updated.

    Votes: 5 45.5%

  • Yes, they should be updated, but in a different manner than what you suggest.

    Votes: 1 9.1%

  • NEVER!!!! I will fight you to the ends of the Earth to stop you!!!!!

    Votes: 2 18.2%
  • Total voters
    11
Druidus

Druidus

Keeper of the Grove
Please sign the petition to change the frubal system. With the current system you may find it hard to effectively give frubals without sometimes randomly giving them to people in order to "Spread it Around". I got back to the forums, after a month, mind you, and yet, I still can't give frubals to some. At least make a time limit for this, perhaps 2-3 days before the message disappears. It would also be nice if we could increase the number of frubals that are givable to someone before giving the message.

Thank you.

Current Signatures:

~~~Druidus~~~
~~~Michel~~~
 
michel

michel

Administrator Emeritus
Staff member
I agree Druidus; there have been quite a few occasions when I heve wanted to 'fruball' someone, but have been unable to do so. My way round that is to make notes of the ones I regard as 'owed'; I'm sure I have lost some of the notes though. Yes, I'll sign.:)
 
No*s

No*s

Captain Obvious
I don't think that would be a good idea. The limitation is in place and serves the function of making us "spread it around," not just keep fruballing the same people. This, IMO, is a good thing :). Imagine how many wouldn't have near as many frubals without that feature. We should simply give more liberally lol.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
Yes, I must admit that I have searched for people to frubal, but the search made me pay more attention to folks that I already like. I do not think that we should change the policy.
 
Druidus

Druidus

Keeper of the Grove
I'm not saying remove it all together, but at least make a time limit. It's ridiculous that I should wantonly wave around frubals if I want to give to those who deserve it. After 2-3 days, if still haven't spread enough frubals, then you should, again, be able to give to that person again.

I know they are there for a reason, but I'll go to the gates of hell to change this. My last visit didn't work to well, and I think I stubbed my toe down there, but I'll go again if I have to. ;)
 
Druidus

Druidus

Keeper of the Grove
Oh, it's hardcoded is it? Darn, I guess the trip to hell is off. :( Too bad really, I here the gates of hell are quite nice this time of year. :rolleyes:

Oh well, I'd still like to hear opinions. Vote in the poll!
 
Yerda

Yerda

Veteran Member
Druidus said:
It's ridiculous that I should wantonly wave around frubals if I want to give to those who deserve it.
Click to expand...
Nonsense. A couple of minutes of reading posts and you should find ample frubalworthy material.
 
Dr. Nosophoros

Dr. Nosophoros

Active Member
I don't believe they should be updated from what I have seen, to me it helps keep the the most outrageous behaviour from becoming the norm while politely accepting (and scolding) the occasional "off" color comment(s), I think overall they serve the greater, we are on a public Internet forum afterall.

Dammnit!! I thought this was a forum rules poll- :bonk:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top