I suspect that many attenuate their criticism of Israel for fear of being labeled antisemitic.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
First off, context is king. Your are mixing two different tangents to two different things. The first comment was in specific terms whereas the second comment was meant in very general terms.Yes but what dialogue? Hell you just said you refer to people as infidels. It doesn't sound like your dialogue has been shutdown. How many people are taking offense? To what are they taking offense. Do the majority or even a large group of your friends take offense to other people's speech? If so what speech?
No antisemite I've ever met feared being labeled antisemitic. On the contrary, they were proud of it and happy to declare it, themselves. And of those who simply disagree with a Jew or two or all of Israel about something, that doesn't make them antisemitic.I suspect that many attenuate their criticism of Israel for fear of being labeled antisemitic.
You know @PureX I'm pretty much the same way. It doesn't happen very often, granted, but sometimes I do run into a thoughtful person who can articulate their ideas beyond listing vapid bullet points they have memorized.I find that to be a very rare circumstance. I have certainly had my words shoved back in my face by people who took offense to them, but they had no control over my thoughts. And I could choose to either defend my words or apologize for them, as I deemed appropriate. And in fact, I tend to recall such instances as having been highly informative, and take them as a gift even if they're a bit uncomfortable for me, in the moment.
What do you mean?
On what planet?I suspect that many attenuate their criticism of Israel for fear of being labeled antisemitic.
Right. People's opinions, thoughts etc. are carefully molded and constructed by people they don't even know exist. Political correctness is designed to be a self-censoring system to paralyze people and eventually allow the world to be passively brought into the political system that is desired by a few people behind the scenes who understand psychology extremely well. People should read George Orwell's 1984. Political correctness is "new speak".pc initiators know that in time their initiative would take hold on people through collective unconscious.
People of all nationalities and races can be racist and interrace racism does occur, whites do not have a monopoly on it and I would say it is reasonable to assume it was occurring in one form or another long before any colonialist adventures by whites.In the past, and in public? Yes.
Soviet Union was very instrumental, also NAZI regimes, but if we dig we would find more ancient roots.Right. People's opinions, thoughts etc. are carefully molded and constructed by people they don't even know exist. Political correctness is designed to be a self-censoring system to paralyze people and eventually allow the world to be passively brought into the political system that is desired by a few people behind the scenes who understand psychology extremely well. People should read George Orwell's 1984. Political correctness is "new speak".
Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I've heard the term politically correct originates from the Soviet Union. Yet people can't see what it is?
So it is based on an imagined response? Do you really imagine that most people would be terribly offended by you saying you do not want to live in or visit Mexico or you asking where are you from?
How do you have to constantly guard against an unintentional offense because of someone's political identity?I can deal with treating people equally. It's kind of natural for me. It gets a little awkward if I have to constantly guard against an unintentional offense because of someone's political identity.
So you do have to edit your speech because of political correctness or you do not?First off, context is king. Your are mixing two different tangents to two different things. The first comment was in specific terms whereas the second comment was meant in very general terms.
In the first instance I spoke, at length, about context. The "infidel dog" comment was not intended for the person I was waving over and smiling at and was in stark juxtaposition to my body language. The comment was meant entirely in jest to my shopping companion(s) simply to illicit laughter, which it never fails to produce. The point is humor is largely the art of, politically incorrect, linguistic gymnastics.
The second comment was, again, meant in general terms. For example, have you ever tried to talk to a self-identified "social justice warrior"? It's like talking to a brick wall that is almost impervious to reason.
So your issue with PC is based on assumptions of what might offend a hypothetically sensitive person?That's kind of the problem. I've no idea what happens to be politically offensive from moment to moment.
I understand folks can be ignorant of things I might be sensitive about. So my first assumption is the intent was not identity motivated. Even if it were motivated by a derogatory intent against some political identity that was assumed upon me, I figure I've got better things to do then waste my time responding to it.
All of this is a great theory but how have you had to edit your speech because of all of this?Right. People's opinions, thoughts etc. are carefully molded and constructed by people they don't even know exist. Political correctness is designed to be a self-censoring system to paralyze people and eventually allow the world to be passively brought into the political system that is desired by a few people behind the scenes who understand psychology extremely well. People should read George Orwell's 1984. Political correctness is "new speak".
Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I've heard the term politically correct originates from the Soviet Union. Yet people can't see what it is?
How do you have to constantly guard against an unintentional offense because of someone's political identity?
So your issue with PC is based on assumptions of what might offend a hypothetically sensitive person?
And really you haven't had to edit yourself much at all but feel on edge because you believe you must be wary of what might offend?
Again, for those in the really slow lane, it is about context. I might say something to my neighbor over the fence that I wouldn't dream of saying in a church or movie theater. On RF, I often have to edit a comment that I think might be perilously close to breaking some rule. Much to the mods angst, I tend to skate very close to the border at times because I cannot say what I am actually thinking.So you do have to edit your speech because of political correctness or you do not?
As soon as I hear an anti-Trump comment in real life, I generally mirror what the speaker is saying. It saves a lot of vexation, but the person has shown me their hand very plainly and that gives me the opening I need to respond, should I choose to.How do you have to constantly guard against an unintentional offense because of someone's political identity?
You ask for an example in real life. This one just happened. I can come up with a thousand more where I have to curtail or ignore the truth to prevent harmful consequences.So the PC movement is only your boss in your mind? Your speech has in no other way been affected?
Such as what? How are you reasonably going to offend someone by being yourself. What might you say?Political identities creates a whole new reality of sensitivities for people to be offended by. So it's like a minefield, you don't know when your going to step into something. The easiest way is to limit interaction with folks until you know they are comfortable with you being yourself.