Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
"Not believing" doesn't represent an inexistence. Inexistence doesn't exist, but "not believing" does.
"Not believing" doesn't represent an inexistence. Inexistence doesn't exist, but "not believing" does.
Thanks, but no. My atheism lies in not believing. I don't lack for any beliefs.If not believing confuses you use "lack of belief" . Babies lack the belief in god/s, thus they are atheists.
Thanks, but no. My atheism lies in not believing. I don't lack for any beliefs.
You should eat your carrots.Thanks, but no. My atheism lies in not believing.
So your atheism is bigger than my atheism. I see.Yes, your atheism. The other definition of atheism, also supported by the oxford dictionary is the form of atheism that comes from lack of belief.
So your atheism is bigger than my atheism. I see.
'Atheism' means the negation of theism, the denial of the existence of God.
So your atheism is bigger than my atheism. I see.
It's interesting that the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy states ...Sadly, I searched in vain for any references to carrots.
I mean that I should give up.What do you mean?
:biglaugh:Oxford dictionary is bigger authority on english language.
I mean that I should give up.
As I said earlier, I don't disagree with the Oxford dictionary. It's you I disagree with.Okay
If you want to take only one of the meanings the OD gives to atheist, then sure.
I mean you could also say you plain dont agree with the OD and for you lack of belief does not equal atheism.
Equally, if you have a source different than OD, maybe your source does think carrots are agnostics.
As I said earlier, I don't disagree with the Oxford dictionary. It's you I disagree with.
But you don't listen.
No, I didn't say that. I don't know where you got that from. If you want my arguments, they are all there in the other thread for you to review.Yu [sic] are saying that a person who lacks a belief in god is not necesarily an atheist.
No, I didn't say that. I don't know where you got that from. If you want my arguments, they are all there in the other thread for you to review.
And I'd also like to point out that I'm not stupid. Your continued asking of, "Where do get lost?" indicated that I don't get it. I do get it, I just disagree.*
*With you, not with Oxford.
You think babies believe in god then?