Explain.Well, yes in one sense and no in another.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Explain.Well, yes in one sense and no in another.
Many countries oppress a part of their citizens. I agree.
Yes, because those in some of the other countries aren't really humans.
But not all countries have humans as individuals or even humans. Thus we have different countries. I know.
Explain.
So it's repression and tyranny you're advocating.
The principles involved are universal. Right Action is based on principle.Arabs in their own country is irrelevant to Switzerland and France. Unless you believe that their laws are based on what others do and a tit for tat attitude.
So If you are for oppressing women, I am with you. It's good for women to oppress some of them. Right? Great.
The principles involved are universal. Right Action is based on principle.
In some countries women are livestock.Yes, because those in some of the other countries aren't really humans.
Yes, the US' strategic initiative has long been to force middle eastern women into cocktail dresses.Principles like "I am a westerner, and I have a westerner's "we" group" like you declare?
Yes, of course. A democratic consultation process does not mean majoritarian tyranny. Certainly not.If we really want to negotiate everything as per a simple majority, then it is easy to strip you or me of our human rights. That is why we have the concept of minority rights and not just majority rights.
Yes, the US' strategic initiative has long been to force middle eastern women into cocktail dresses.
You can decide to cover yourself top to bottom. It's unclear what moral right you have to force others to do the same.
Conforming to certain commonly agreed upon social norms particular to a certain society in certain place and time in history??What do you not understand about the word "civilised" ?
Is there some sort of Muslim clothing ban there right now? If yes, then its immoral. I am opposed to the banning any sort of clothing choice, unless it directly and clearly harms another person (like if someone wears neon lights to a movie and flashes them about etc. )Like in France and Switzerland right? forcing others women in some manner of clothing!
Is there some sort of Muslim clothing ban there right now? If yes, then its immoral. I am opposed to the banning any sort of clothing choice, unless it directly and clearly harms another person (like if someone wears neon lights to a movie and flashes them about etc. )
Don't you think nudity is different than not wearing Hijab? So, in civilized countries women do not wear Hijab, so you think they are nude?I voted "The state (or authority in power) has the right to dictate such".
It is an essential part of our civilisation.
Does anybody really think that we should all go about our business in the nude?
If not "embarrassing," it was at the very least sloppy -- unless, of course, you seriously wish to maintain that:
means
Yes, I know .. you live in France
I was talking to @mikkel_the_dane , and Christianity came to us much later.
In some countries women are livestock.