So far as I know, there were only two scientific polls (as opposed to numerous straw polls) taken immediately after the second debate Sunday night. These polls should be taken with a grain of salt because they are likely to be less accurate than the regular tracking polls that will be out in a few days (which themselves may be subject to error). Nevertheless, the two scientific polls are likely to be far more accurate than straw polls.
Thoughtful Comments? Trenchant Opinions? Regurgitated Political Rants?
[Source: Clinton wins, Trump exceeds expectations, but few move]CNN Poll said:Among voters who watched the debate, 57% said Clinton did the best job in the face-off at Washington University in St. Louis, while just 34% thought Trump did. That's a less commanding victory for Clinton than in the first debate, but she still boosted her edge over Trump among debate watchers on handling the economy and being the stronger leader.
More than 6-in-10, however, said Trump did a better job than they expected, while 21% thought he did a worse job than expected. Clinton also exceeded expectations, but by a smaller margin: 39% said she did better than they were expecting her to, while 26% thought she did worse.
There was a wide gender gap in perceptions of who won the debate, with 64% of women saying Clinton did the best job vs. 49% of men.
[Source: Post-debate poll: Clinton 47%, Trump 42%]YouGov Poll said:According to YouGov's post-debate poll, which interviewed 812 registered voters who watched the debate, Hillary Clinton won the debate against Donald Trump by 47% to 42%. Clinton narrowly won undecideds 44% to 41%. She was also considered “more Presidential” by a 57% to 31% margin. There was a gender gap, however: women thought Clinton won by 50-38%, while men thought Trump won by 46-43%.
Thoughtful Comments? Trenchant Opinions? Regurgitated Political Rants?