• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Prison Labour

Laika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I did a poll a while back and one of the things that came out of it was that there was comparatively significant support for "imprisonment with hard labour" on RF. Its not an issue that comes up much on here, so I wondered what where people stand on whether the state (or private prisons) can and should use prisoners as a source of labour. Do you think this is acceptable way for prisoners to repay their debt to society or is it an abuse of power waiting to happen?

Thoughts?
 

SalixIncendium

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि
Staff member
Premium Member
I did a poll a while back and one of the things that came out of it was that there was comparatively significant support for "imprisonment with hard labour" on RF. Its not an issue that comes up much on here, so I wondered what where people stand on whether the state (or private prisons) can and should use prisoners as a source of labour. Do you think this is acceptable way for prisoners to repay their debt to society or is it an abuse of power waiting to happen?

Thoughts?

Only if they don't plan on filing a lawsuit. If they do, we have no other choice than to move them into a comfy air conditioned cell.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
I agree with @Revoltingest, with the caveat that if the labor is used by a for-profit corporation the chances of corruption and abuse of workers seem really high.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I agree with @Revoltingest, with the caveat that if the labor is used by a for-profit corporation the chances of corruption and abuse of workers seem really high.
From what I hear from former prisoners & one guard I know, corruption takes a back seat to incompetence,
indifference, & cruelty. Profitable or otherwise, those evils are things we diligently fight against.
 

BSM1

What? Me worry?
I did a poll a while back and one of the things that came out of it was that there was comparatively significant support for "imprisonment with hard labour" on RF. Its not an issue that comes up much on here, so I wondered what where people stand on whether the state (or private prisons) can and should use prisoners as a source of labour. Do you think this is acceptable way for prisoners to repay their debt to society or is it an abuse of power waiting to happen?

Thoughts?

I still recall the "chain gangs" of my youth. That form of labor was definitely more punishment than debt repayment. The abuse and cruelty was also evident.

I agree with @Revoltingest, with the caveat that if the labor is used by a for-profit corporation the chances of corruption and abuse of workers seem really high.


The state is the biggest abuser of these prisoners. No matter what you believe, corporations and businesses are not set up to punish and/or abuse their employees.
 

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
The state is the biggest abuser of these prisoners. No matter what you believe, corporations and businesses are not set up to punish and/or abuse their employees.
I believe the state has a huge history of prison abuse and do not deny it. But I believe that private, profit prisons so far have been even more hilariously corrupt and abusive. Doing things like giving out demerits with such frequency and baselessness to intentionally keep peaceful inmates in jail because it earns them more money. Lobbying to keep marijuana illegal purely because more inmates = more money. And that's just a start.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I still recall the "chain gangs" of my youth. That form of labor was definitely more punishment than debt repayment. The abuse and cruelty was also evident.




The state is the biggest abuser of these prisoners. No matter what you believe, corporations and businesses are not set up to punish and/or abuse their employees.
It seems that most people get their views on private prisons from Orange Is The New Black.
To know people who spent time in government run hoosegows, gives a different perspective.
Government employees are even more immune to control.

It all boils down to this.....
Government controls what happens in prisons by its own regulation & oversight.
We need to watch them doing the watching, & hold them accountable.
When you vote, does the candidate's agenda for the justice industrial complex
concern you? It should, since it's one of the most important abusers of civil
rights & taxpayer money.
.
 

Erebus

Well-Known Member
Forced labour coupled with a profit margin is a perfect breeding ground for corruption. Forced labour in the name of punishment rather than profit strikes me as pointless. Opportunities to work, study and gain the skills needed to reintegrate into society should one wish to partake in them seem like the best option to me.

Ultimately, the "punishment" side of crime and punishment should focus on three things in my opinion:

1. Reparations to victims if possible.

2. Rehabilitation for those who can be rehabilitated.

3. Removing those who represent a persistent threat (such as those with personality disorders so severe that rehabilitation is a wasted effort) from society.

Note that none of that is about inflicting suffering on people. It's certainly not about making a tidy profit.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
There is a serious structural problem as the Standford Prison Experiment demonstrated. For those who don't know this, college students were randomly assigned to be guards and prisoners for a few days.

"... Our planned two-week investigation into the psychology of prison life had to be ended after only six days because of what the situation was doing to the college students who participated. In only a few days, our guards became sadistic and our prisoners became depressed and showed signs of extreme stress

To avoid making a bad situation worse, prison labor should be totally voluntary and the inmates receive decent pay.

And personally introducing a profit motive here would just make the situation worse.
 

Nous

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I did a poll a while back and one of the things that came out of it was that there was comparatively significant support for "imprisonment with hard labour" on RF. Its not an issue that comes up much on here, so I wondered what where people stand on whether the state (or private prisons) can and should use prisoners as a source of labour. Do you think this is acceptable way for prisoners to repay their debt to society or is it an abuse of power waiting to happen?
No, "using prisoners" for free labor is unethical. But it is rehabilitative for them to be able to volunteer for projects, and, especially, to further their education--all prisoners should come out with a PhD. One of the most excellent ways for inmates to occupy their time and brains is in the programs where they engage in obedience training of dogs--and I think even for guide dogs. In the past couple of decades, several prisons have instituted such programs.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I did a poll a while back and one of the things that came out of it was that there was comparatively significant support for "imprisonment with hard labour" on RF. Its not an issue that comes up much on here, so I wondered what where people stand on whether the state (or private prisons) can and should use prisoners as a source of labour. Do you think this is acceptable way for prisoners to repay their debt to society or is it an abuse of power waiting to happen?

Thoughts?

I don't agree with forced labor, although there might be incentives put in place for prisoners to do volunteer labor or community service, as others have suggested.

On the other hand, there are some crimes which are so heinous and dastardly that punishment entailing hard labor might appeal to one's sense of justice. One could also argue that, the harsher the punishment, the greater the deterrent to crime - which could be considered a societal benefit.

Occasionally, I see prisoners working along the side of the road, doing clean up and so forth. I've also seen prisoners doing work cleaning at various public buildings downtown.

I actually think there are other ways of going about this. For one thing, there's no reason any non-violent offenders should even be in prison. If they're not violent or dangerous, then they can be put on probation, kept under surveillance, tracked with ankle monitors - yet still be able to have jobs and be more productive than they would be if they were just sitting in prison with nothing to do.
 

BSM1

What? Me worry?
I don't agree with forced labor, although there might be incentives put in place for prisoners to do volunteer labor or community service, as others have suggested.

On the other hand, there are some crimes which are so heinous and dastardly that punishment entailing hard labor might appeal to one's sense of justice. One could also argue that, the harsher the punishment, the greater the deterrent to crime - which could be considered a societal benefit.

Occasionally, I see prisoners working along the side of the road, doing clean up and so forth. I've also seen prisoners doing work cleaning at various public buildings downtown.

I actually think there are other ways of going about this. For one thing, there's no reason any non-violent offenders should even be in prison. If they're not violent or dangerous, then they can be put on probation, kept under surveillance, tracked with ankle monitors - yet still be able to have jobs and be more productive than they would be if they were just sitting in prison with nothing to do.

I don't necessarily disagree with you, but suppose those felons that did the most heinous and dastardly crimes refuse to work? These types are perfect argument for the death penalty; if they are that bad just get rid of them, humanely, of course.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I don't necessarily disagree with you, but suppose those felons that did the most heinous and dastardly crimes refuse to work? These types are perfect argument for the death penalty; if they are that bad just get rid of them, humanely, of course.

Well, I guess they could spend a night in the box.

 
Top