Not being very good (in your opinion) doesn't change that - there is plenty of human creativity many people think is rubbish too.
Don't misunderstand what I meant, as I said it depends on the AI, I was referring to ChatGPT and should probably have specified that, but then again it is a language AI, but it seems to have changed a lot since I tried the last time.
Because last time it took me a while to get it to make up a story, but now it is no issues at all:
I'm not into poems, so whether it's beautiful or not I have no clue
but I have to admit that I couldn't do that, and not at the speed it can do it.
Also, this was some AI art I created with another AI, where you can type some keywords and then it generates something based on that.
But these AIs keep impressing me, so I actually agree with you.
I expect that in 10 years there'll be more programmers because a whole load will be working in AI.
You might be right. But I tried to interact with it a bit more about the project to test it a little, so I wanted to see how it would solve an issue. And this is how it went:
The mere fact, that it even understands the idea behind the project and can come up with suggestions, to me is mind-blowing. What it is saying makes perfect sense in regard to what the project is about and how "we" have developed it, because we talked about XML earlier.
I'm pretty sure the text is the only thing the AI is actually generating, and as you say, that's the part that needs a human to fix. The rest is just a choice of templates and layouts. Again, you don't need AI to do that and there are plenty of conventional services which do that automatically already. This is just using the current in-term to get money from the naive. Six months ago they were probably selling NFTs.
My guess is that working as a web designer today with so many sites that can create websites for you, including shops etc. that it is not a particularly good area to work in, compared to for instance 15-20 years ago, when this wasn't possible.
So to think that it won't also affect other programmers I think is to be a bit naive.
Yes, but they've also not completely replaced land-lines or cameras and they've not really replaced previous activity. People make more calls, send more messages, take more pictures and videos than they did in the past, just with a wider range of tools.
But it is close, not in regards to cameras, but I think a lot of this comes from the fact that there is a limit to how small you can make them if you want them to be good, with lenses etc. Phones need to be small. But landlines are almost dead, at least in Denmark, I don't know a single person that has one.
No, computers thrive in that context, which is why programming languages were developed that way in the first place. The whole point of AI is to go beyond that limitation, not just than operate within it.
Yes, but AI thrives here as well because it can keep track of all the data, rules, methods etc. Obviously, they need learning, but no human can do that as fast as they can. And computer programs in theory just huge amounts of data and how to manipulate them.
Well, most Project Managers could probably be replaced with AI but then most Project Managers could be replaced by brick wall with a calendar hung on it. I'm pretty sure we'll still need people to do the actual work.
Well agree with that
But a huge issue is as with the photograph above, that those that gave him a prize didn't know it was an AI, yet he won. It took me less than 5 seconds to make it write that poem. It doesn't take a lot of imagination to figure out that one could make it write 400 poems and then you select the ones you think is best, put them in a book and publish them, I'm not sure people would be able to tell the difference. But for people writing poems, this might not be the best news. And my guess is that they get better and better, again if one can already win a photo contest or what it was, then it is clearly good enough or at least better than a lot of humans. So rather than hire a professional photographer just get the AI to create 100 photos and choose the one you like the most. If the only thing that makes someone like something is because a given human made it, then one could argue that the art itself is probably not that important anyway. Obviously, there is something about having an original, but for most artists, this is not relevant, it is the fewest people which will reach that status.
These AI's are going to have a massive impact on society in places where people couldn't imagine it I think.
