Proof of Creationism made by NASA

[Jose Fly]

So true, and it's unfortunate that some use religion as an excuse to ignore reality, whereas religion is supposed to be enlightening, not darkening.

If nothing else, fundamentalists are fascinating to observe.

 

[metis]

If nothing else, fundamentalists are fascinating to observe.

Instead of "fascinating", I prefer "nauseating", and that's because I painfully left the fundamentalist church I grew up in because of the rejection of this most basic scientific axiom, never to return.

 

[Sand Dancer]

James Webb powerful telescope have disproven 13.7-billion-year history after Big Bang. The only alternative to billion years is 6000 years of Universe history, which Dr. Kent Hovind has talked about.
The Kent's idea is what Universe is 6000 years old. More in:
Omphalos hypothesis - Wikipedia

Look the party at Kent's friends:

It was Physics' Community who has introduced Big Bang and Darwinism. Now we found that it was a lie. Not Creationism is lie, but Scientific Community has lied. Because it has ignored Genesis of the Bible.

They are thinking the universe is far older than we had previously thought. So how did you come up with your conclusion?

 

[metis]

They are thinking the universe is far older than we had previously thought. So how did you come up with your conclusion?

And we may well be only part of a multiverse whereas who knows what existed prior to the BB.

 

[questfortruth]

I'm talking about what your link says. Why are you deflecting? The link you posted clearly claims the creator in that hypothesis is a liar.

The Wikipedia is controlled by atheists.

 

[questfortruth]

They are thinking the universe is far older than we had previously thought. So how did you come up with your conclusion?

I am Christian.

 

[muhammad_isa]

The Wikipedia is controlled by atheists.

That's rubbish !
The pages are written by 1000's of people, and if it was controlled by one group over another, it would be obvious and lose credibility.

I can see that you are not involved in the project.

 

[John53]

The Wikipedia is controlled by atheists.

So your link is wrong? If so why post it?

 

[metis]

The Wikipedia is controlled by atheists.

Evidence?

 

[Jose Fly]

Instead of "fascinating", I prefer "nauseating", and that's because I painfully left the fundamentalist church I grew up in because of the rejection of this most basic scientific axiom, never to return.

I understand. For me, I find them fascinating in the sense that I truly cannot understand how they can engage in certain behaviors while being completely oblivious to what they're doing and how others perceive it.

I've kinda settled on one general explanation, but I'm not too happy about it. I wish I didn't have to go there, but after interacting with so many creationists for over 20 years and seeing the same things over and over, there really was no other conclusion to reach.

 

[questfortruth]

So your link is wrong? If so why post it?

I have not sinned. I explained why the link is not 100 % true. But it contains some useable information.

 

[Father Heathen]

What's an "evolutionist"? Is that anything like a gravitationist? Also, what does the big bang have to do with evolution?

 

[Guitar's Cry]

The only alternative to billion years is 6000 years of Universe history, which Dr. Kent Hovind has talked about.

That's a rather stark dichotomy.

 

[John53]

I have not sinned. I explained why the link is not 100 % true. But it contains some useable information.

If something is not 100% true why would anyone trust it at all?

 

[John53]

I have not sinned. I explained why the link is not 100 % true. But it contains some useable information.

You didn't explain anything, you made an unproven accusation against wikipedia.

 

[Altfish]

James Webb powerful telescope have disproven 13.7-billion-year history after Big Bang. The only alternative to billion years is 6000 years of Universe history, which Dr. Kent Hovind has talked about.
The Kent's idea is what Universe is 6000 years old. More in:
Omphalos hypothesis - Wikipedia

Look the party at Kent's friends:

It was Physics' Community who has introduced Big Bang and Darwinism. Now we found that it was a lie. Not Creationism is lie, but Scientific Community has lied. Because it has ignored Genesis of the Bible.

Good grief, not prison bird Kent Hovind again.

 

[Heyo]

The Wikipedia is controlled by atheists.

If that were true (which I doubt), why do think that is?
Maybe because religious people are slackers because they think their god is doing everything for them? Like the creationists "scientists" who rarely publish anything and don't do experiments?

 

[Jimmy]

the sky cracked open, the earth shook, the dead rose!

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

James Webb powerful telescope have disproven 13.7-billion-year history after Big Bang. The only alternative to billion years is 6000 years of Universe history, which Dr. Kent Hovind has talked about.
The Kent's idea is what Universe is 6000 years old. More in:
Omphalos hypothesis - Wikipedia

Look the party at Kent's friends:

It was Physics' Community who has introduced Big Bang and Darwinism. Now we found that it was a lie. Not Creationism is lie, but Scientific Community has lied. Because it has ignored Genesis of the Bible.

Aaaannnnndddd they're off! Again...sheesh.

 

[icehorse]

The only alternative to billion years is 6000 years of Universe history, which Dr. Kent Hovind has talked about.

At first blush this seems like a whopper of a false dilemma. Can you clarify why these are the only two choices?