• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Prospective President Kamala Harris

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
My morning NYT email alerted me to the following piece in the Sacramento Bee:


the central question posed being: "But do Americans share enough disgust over Trump this year to forget their traditional misogyny when it comes to the top job?

We can expect more than enough sexist and misogynistic attacks (here as well as elsewhere) against "DEI Harris." Let's hope that this serves only to amplify the breadth and depth of the disgust over the MAGA-Project 2025 team.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
If Harris loses to Trump, will you be shouting "Misogyny!"
Bear in mind that Trump had been ahead of a rich white
man in the polls. Misogyny & racism don't explain that.

It's actually worse than you fear. Misogyny isn't as bad
as the possibility that a majority of voters actually want
Trump as President....not someone else...not anyone else.

I'm hoping that my giving her consideration
will result in her being worth voting for.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
If Harris loses to Trump, will you be shouting "Misogyny!"
Bear in mind that Trump had been ahead of a rich white
man in the polls. Misogyny & racism don't explain that.

It's actually worse than you fear. Misogyny isn't as bad
as the possibility that a majority of voters actually want
Trump as President....not someone else...not anyone else.

I'm hoping that my giving her consideration
will result in her being worth voting for.

Maybe it could be combination. In general don't rule out multifactor explanations, just because a single factor is simpler.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
If Harris loses to Trump, will you be shouting "Misogyny!"
Bear in mind that Trump had been ahead of a rich white
man in the polls. Misogyny & racism don't explain that.
I can assure that I would have been shouting misogyny even if Trump had won against Biden or any white male. And there is still a possibility that the Democratic nominee will be a white man. It doesn't matter, it Trump wins misogyny and racism will be the reason why. Trump is running on a campaign of misogyny and racism.
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
I can assure that I would have been shouting misogyny even if Trump had won against Biden or any white male. And there is still a possibility that the Democratic nominee will be a white man. It doesn't matter, it Trump wins misogyny and racism will be the reason why. Trump is running on a campaign of misogyny and racism.

Trump is, in many ways, a reaction to this country's first black President. It's no coincidence the birtherism propaganda has been and is already being applied to Kamala Harris.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
I think the dilemma with Trump as the republican nominee is that support for him requires many conservatives to suspend their ethics and moral sense. They are supporting him not because he will do a good job, but because he is offering them something personal to them. It might be tax cuts, or it might be some ideological purity. As these otherwise good conservatives suspend their better angels they will be open to the worst prejudices against Harris, as a woman, as a woman of color, as a child of immigrants, as a democrat, as a liberal, etc. We can expect all the ugliness of Trump and his followers where it comes to Harris. Trump and his followers seem to be facing new fears now that Biden is out, and as we know, Trump and MAGAs do not do ell when scared, like trapped animals. I predict Harris will take Michelle Obama's advice annd take the high ground. That will let Trump and MAGA's irrational anger and tantrums collapse on itself.
 

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
Yes.

The idiot lost the popular vote twice. Was impeached twice. Is a rapist, a felon, and all around piece of $#@% human being who is demonstrably both a sociopath and a narcissist. Oh, and also the oldest Presidential candidate in history in an era where their party loved playing the ageism card against their opponent (shoe's on the other foot now, huh?). They could've nominated someone who is actually respectable for their candidate. They didn't. And on the heels of the disaster that was half the population of this country being rendered second class citizens by a politicized supreme court?

Yes.

Also, yes.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Yes.

The idiot lost the popular vote twice. Was impeached twice. Is a rapist, a felon, and all around piece of $#@% human being who is demonstrably both a sociopath and a narcissist. Oh, and also the oldest Presidential candidate in history in an era where their party loved playing the ageism card against their opponent (shoe's on the other foot now, huh?). They could've nominated someone who is actually respectable for their candidate. They didn't. And on the heels of the disaster that was half the population of this country being rendered second class citizens by a politicized supreme court?

Yes.

Also, yes.
That light green color font is really tough on old eyes.
 

Soandso

ᛋᛏᚨᚾᛞ ᛋᚢᚱᛖ
Yes.

The idiot lost the popular vote twice. Was impeached twice. Is a rapist, a felon, and all around piece of $#@% human being who is demonstrably both a sociopath and a narcissist. Oh, and also the oldest Presidential candidate in history in an era where their party loved playing the ageism card against their opponent (shoe's on the other foot now, huh?). They could've nominated someone who is actually respectable for their candidate. They didn't. And on the heels of the disaster that was half the population of this country being rendered second class citizens by a politicized supreme court?

Yes.

Also, yes.

Don't forget the grifter, exploiter, and scammer part of it too. The guy's been running scams since long before he was ever president
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
I don't think we're discussing the same thing.
I addressed speculatively blaming misogyny for Harris's loss.
You're addressing Trump's faults.
We just assume Harris identifies a black/Asian women. That’s offensive! Has anyone bothered to ask??????
 
Top