BilliardsBall
Veteran Member
Nah.
"Nah" isn't a refutation. We Jews can do better.
How is the coming Messiah a priest forever according to Melchizedek, do you think?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Nah.
It wasn't intended as one."Nah" isn't a refutation.
I find your sentence to be doubly pretentious.We Jews can do better.
I am not sure what it means (although Rashi's take on עַל־דִּ֝בְרָתִ֗י is interesting). I am, however, sure that I have zero interest in engaging you on the subject.How is the coming Messiah a priest forever according to Melchizedek, do you think?
Well can agree that that is one of the ways of looking at it, sure.So we can begin by agreeing that these events are set in heaven, at the throne of God.
If we are talking about eternal souls (though, in fact, there is a widespread understanding of the verse that the term "sit at my right hand" is metaphorical) then it makes sense for Abe to be in God's presence even though he has died, bodily. Of course, since another way of understanding this has nothing to do with heaven, his death is not related.If Abraham is seen at the right hand of God in heaven, how would he have arrived there? We know from scripture that he died and was buried. Does a dead man sit at the right hand of God?
Actually, it takes resurrection to make the transition from heaven to earth, not earth to heaven. That takes (generally) death.It takes resurrection (or translation) to make the transition from earth to heaven. When, therefore, was Abraham resurrected?
Hi BilliardsBall,"Nah" isn't a refutation. We Jews can do better.
How is the coming Messiah a priest forever according to Melchizedek, do you think?
Other important conclusions can be drawn from this scripture. For those of the Bahai faith, it is clear that the Son of man is to be received into heaven until the ‘time of restitution of all things’. The claim that the Messiah (or equivalent) has already returned does not correspond with this description of the ‘restitution of all things’ [see Acts 3:21].
In the King James at Psalms 110 there are two (2) LORD/Lord's mentioned.Wouldn't Psalms 110:1 indicate whoever this 'lord' is, is not YHWH? Ie if Jesus is this 'lord,' he's not God.
........If we are talking about eternal souls (though, in fact, there is a widespread understanding of the verse that the term "sit at my right hand" is metaphorical) then it makes sense for Abe to be in God's presence even though he has died, bodily. Of course, since another way of understanding this has nothing to do with heaven, his death is not related.
Actually, it takes resurrection to make the transition from heaven to earth, not earth to heaven. That takes (generally) death.
There are more NT references to Psalm 110 than to any other psalm.
Does Psalm 110 convince you that Christ is Lord?
No. Not at all.
Not even a little.
Thanks for asking though.
I understand what the Christian idea is. What I'm saying is that Christian idea is contradicted by the Psalm. The 'lord' is not YHWH in that passage. They are distinct.
Hi Tony,The Bab, who is also the Lamb fulfilled Acts 3:21, the Bab was the Gate, the Elijah that opened the way for the 'Day of God.
Pslam 110, is just as valid for the Messages given by the Bab and Baha'u'llah.
Regards Tony
Hi Tony,
Why do you think there was need for further messengers after the Holy Spirit was promised and received?
Thanks for your supportive words.Does it convince? Not many people, at least, not in these days where people are probably more likely to be watching porn than reading scripture.
But it's one I love - God said to my Lord. There's a time period involved here, 'until' .....
Another interesting one, probably the most Christ centric Psalm is 22.
Thanks for your work here...
The NT teaches that the Holy Spirit is now available to all who repent and believe in Jesus Christ as Lord. What can new 'messengers' add that is not already available?I see God sends the Messengers so we can find and embrace the Holy Spirit. That is God's Covenant, that we will not be left alone to our selves.
There is no man that receives this Spirit, but the ones whom God chooses to be the Messengers. Then they are born of the Holy Spirit, and infuse the world with it. They are not men like us.
We have a chance in each age to accept and then be born again into that Spirit.
Regards Tony
There's Lord and there's YHWH. There's two entities here, and a passage of time involved before the Lord reigns over enemies.
The NT teaches that the Holy Spirit is now available to all who repent and believe in Jesus Christ as Lord. What can new 'messengers' add that is not already available?
I hope you don't mind me answering this accusation!Sure, so if there are two entities, and one is YHWH and the other is someone else, then if the someone else is Jesus, Jesus isn't YHWH.
I hope you don't mind me answering this accusation!
To my understanding, the Spirit of the Father (YHWH) was in Jesus in full measure [John 3:34]. The soul of Jesus was one with the Father's Spirit. Therefore, it is consistent and reasonable to talk about Christ as the Spirit of God dwelling amongst men on earth, or being 'God with us'.
Psalm 110:1-4 (KJV)
‘The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.
The LORD shall send the rod of thy strength out of Zion: rule thou in the midst of thine enemies.
Thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power, in the beauties of holiness from the womb of the morning: thou hast the dew of thy youth.
The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.’
To my understanding, Psalm 110 tells us that there is a mediator standing between God the Father and mankind. David represents the best of mankind, yet even he is shown to be a sinner by comparison with the one who sits at the right hand of God in heaven.I've already addressed this. I know what your doctrines tell you. But that isn't what the Psalm says.