TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Ah...yes...the concept of preventive war...
to justify NATO's animalistic and warlike nature.
"preventive war"? What on earth are you talking about....
I have evolved from the animal stage. The NATO hasn't evidently.
I have some news from you: there is diplomacy.
Kant, Voltaire, Rousseau, Montesquieu...
treaties, treaties, treaties.
Not cannons.
None of this addresses what I actually said.
The Soros-owned media are less credible.
NATO doesn't get its intel from "media".
It shows.I prefer Russian media.
I love separatism.
It's the respect towards people's right to self-determination.
Something Russia doesn't respect, which is why they engaged in such practices in Ukraine are are engaging in such practices in Moldavia, Georgie, etc.
Undermining countries' sovereignty, fake news, sabotage, funding and engaging in terrorism, influencing / sabotaging / undermining free elections etc.
You won't answer all of my question. Just 40%.
You didn't ask a question. Just made a ridiculous irrelevant statement which has nothing to do with the point of why ex-soviet countries are seeking protection under the umbrella of NATO from a Russia that constantly threatens, sabotages and undermines them.
Gaddafi was a true leader.
Absolutely admirable. Great man.
I will never understand why you glorify authoritarian dictators so much.
And off course, all the while enjoying your constitutional freedom in a free secular democracy with your human rights and all.
It is absolutely disgusting.
If the NATO were a peaceful organization..it would have solved the Libyan problems with diplomacy.
Again..there are apes who act like apes, and there are philosophy who use reason and knowledge.
The things you write are so sickening.