I just posted a link that says 25 people died in BLM riots. You could find it too if you did a 1 second search.
See, there ya go again. Expecting me to find links to support your argument.
Also, you "just posted" the link?! It should have been posted when you made your assertion, not days later after being prodded by others.
But, OK. Let's look at your article. First off, it's on the Guardian website - not a very reliable source. Like you, they have problems with their sources...
At least 11 Americans have been killed while participating in political demonstrations this year and another 14 have died in other incidents linked to political unrest, according to new data from a non-profit monitoring political unrest in the United States.
What "non-profit monitoring political unrest in the United States"? Why don't they say?
You are relying on data from a rag that they repeated from an unknown source. Do you even bother to try to make a coherent argument? Ever?
Let's look some more. The headline from your year-old story, which you copied, screams
25 Americans Killed. Your intent was to show that BLM demonstrations were violent.
What does the article actually say?
At least 11 Americans have been killed while participating in political demonstrations this year and another 14 have died in other incidents linked to political unrest.
Eleven killed by whom? Conservatives like Rittenhouse who attended protests with the intention of killing people?
How did the other fourteen die? The article is silent.
You, very belatedly, quote from a source that doesn't disclose where they get their information. You scream the headlines while ignoring the content. If you had actually read the article you would know all these things.
Once again, you show why your credibility is non-existent.