Hello, I want to ask about something I read in this article on Wikipedia. I have created a link to it on archive.org: here. The article has a section called "Jesus in Ahmaddiyya Islam" where it has some reasoning about how it is known that Jesus died in Kashmir. It also says that Ahmadis believe that this explanation was part of breaking the cross by Ahmad. My question is, if there appeared other arguments (since Ahmad's argument) that Jesus died should they be considered valuable, too; or should only this one be valued and others considered extras? Is it impossible that there are better arguments?
