firedragon
Veteran Member
No. By definition, Universe means all that exists. How can there be more than one "all that exists"?
You should use the same logic.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No. By definition, Universe means all that exists. How can there be more than one "all that exists"?
You can't use the same logic because by definition you can't have more than one "all".You should use the same logic.
No. By definition, Universe means all that exists. How can there be more than one "all that exists"?
You can't use the same logic because by definition you can't have more than one "all".
Then my example of the universe being the only "necessary being" that I can think of still holds. The concept does not support the existence of a God.If you mean necessary being, it is a necessary thing which means it does not bank on anything and other things will ultimately bank on it but by itself, it is not not relying or banking on anything else outside of it.
No problem. Use the same logic.
You made a generalizing claim which is wrongI've never claimed to be smart BUT give me an example of the evidence that has been found.
Please, this is simply goading. He did use appropriate logic. You have yet to show how this generates a need for a deity at all.
Then my example of the universe being the only "necessary being" that I can think of still holds.
We don't know exactly how the universe began yet. But why do you think that it cannot begin to exist. We know that the universe exists. We do not know that a God exists. No one has demonstrated as of yet a valid reason to believe in a God.How can a necessary being begin?
We don't know exactly how the universe began yet. But why do you think that it cannot begin to exist. We know that the universe exists. We do not know that a God exists. No one has demonstrated as of yet a valid reason to believe in a God.
One thing that people should realize. Sometimes the correct answer to a question is "We don't know yet."
Not even close. Time is part of the universe. No universe, no time. They had to begin together.Its like asking "why cant a triangle be a circle".
Not even close. Time is part of the universe. No universe, no time. They had to begin together.
Then your term is of no value since it appears to go against reality. You only refute yourself by artificially limiting your terms when they fail.necessary being by definition is "necessary", and cannot begin.
So that question is invalid.
We’ve been over this already; if the Universe is all that exists, you can’t have more than one Universe.No problem. Use the same logic.
It is illogical to ask the same question over and over expecting a different response.I say again, use the same logic.
What makes you think the Universe began to exist?How can a necessary being begin?
Then your term is of no value since it appears to go against reality. You only refute yourself by artificially limiting your terms when they fail.
What makes you think the Universe began to exist?
We’ve been over this already; if the Universe is all that exists, you can’t have more than one Universe.
It is illogical to ask the same question over and over expecting a different response.
Then quit.Yes. IT is illogical to ask the same question over and over again expecting a different response.