Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No you're not.I’m your opinion...
Countries? I doubt there would be countries that would engage in a nuclear strike unprovoked.are there countries that would try to nuke other countries if the ever acquired the technology?
Yeah, any potentially. Any nation with a nutjob leader.I’m your opinion are there countries that would try to nuke other countries if the ever acquired the technology?
I’mIn your opinion are there countries that would try to nuke other countries if the ever acquired the technology?
As long as the leaders are convinced they'd die in an exchange not likely but I suppose someone like Hitler would have done it.Yeah, any potentially. Any nation with a nutjob leader.
Including the ones that already have them or have them and pretend they don't.
Hitler would absolutely have nuked any city on Earth, if he thought no one could nuke Germany back. That is. Yeah I imagine some people like Putin, might think a nuclear bunker could be a good exit strategy...As long as the leaders are convinced they'd die in an exchange not likely but I suppose someone like Hitler would have done it.
Anyone who has the mentality of a murder/suicide and access to nukes is a possibility.Fixed.
There is only 1 country that has used nuclear weapons in conflict. Would they or any other country use a nuclear strike? I doubt it, the stakes are too high now. Though i could be wrong. India / Pakistan.. Russia / whoever... Iran / Israel are possible but as I said, i doubt it. But terrorist organisations, that's a different matter.
Exactly. A robust low yield nuclear bomb, could be carried by a human being. In a suitcase. Then detonated, wherever that person is standing. Outside Buckingham palace or in Central Park...But terrorist organisations, that's a different matte
Anyone who has the mentality of a murder/suicide and access to nukes is a possibility.
Exactly. A robust low yield nuclear bomb, could be carried by a human being. In a suitcase. Then detonated, wherever that person is standing. Outside Buckingham palace or in Central Park...
That is an increasingly serious threat, which I think is underestimated. Especially as time goes by.
A lot easier to make. A schoolboy/girl could make one, all you need are explosives and some obtainable quantity of radioactive element like Plutonium 242, a reactor waste product of Uranium 238 fission. Essentially.Or a dirty bomb, that's what I'd be thinking about with terror groups
There is no doubt in my mind at all that this is entirely the case.I personally think trump is capable, he simply doesn't care about anyone else but himself
I doubt it.Hitler would absolutely have nuked any city on Earth, if he thought no one could nuke Germany back. That is. Yeah I imagine some people like Putin, might think a nuclear bunker could be a good exit strategy...
Maybe. But it's good to know that even IF he is crazy enough to actually give such order (I doubt it, tbh...), it wouldn't be him that is actually pressing the button. It would be multiple other people who would have to be at least equally crazy enough to actually carry out that crazy an order.There is no doubt in my mind at all that this is entirely the case.
I think it would become more likely if The Russian Federation disintegrates.In case of Russia I expect it would have to be extreme mega last resort.
Maybe. But it's good to know that even IF he is crazy enough to actually give such order (I doubt it, tbh...),
Not anymoreIn your opinion are there countries that would try to nuke other countries if the ever acquired the technology?