Shadow Link
Active Member
The gap between Islam and Christianity is the importance of Hope.Just wondering if anyone knew...
Does Islam share any stances with Catholicism on morality? If so, what?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The gap between Islam and Christianity is the importance of Hope.Just wondering if anyone knew...
Does Islam share any stances with Catholicism on morality? If so, what?
Just wondering if anyone knew...
Does Islam share any stances with Catholicism on morality? If so, what?
Basically everything in terms of sexuality, charity and warfare.
Actually, this is what the Qur'an says about warfare:I don't think Islam and Christianity share the same philosophy when it comes to warfare. Just War for Catholics is all about being in a position of defense. It's a response to an aggression by someone else. Islam, however, was spread through conquest and that isn't compatible with just war.
Muslims also teach that we should always try to live virtuously, but at the same time Islam admits that we still all sin. So we should minimize our sins as much as possible and do as much good as possible. This is the same as Catholicism. We try to live virtuously like Christ, but as St. Paul says, "There is no one who lives and who does not sin."Lastly, I think where Islam and Catholicism differ is that Islam basically teaches you outweigh your good deeds with the bad. Catholics teach that sin is still sin no matter how small and we should always try to live virtuously like Christ.
In other words, Muslims are only to wage war when they are being directly persecuted and are unable to live as Muslims. They are only to fight those who fight against them, and if they have a treaty with anyone, they are not to violate it at all. If their enemies break that treaty, then they have grounds to fight. But if no one fights against them, they are forbidden from being the aggressor. And even in the middle of battle, if someone surrenders, you escort them outside the battle and let them go free. This is exactly like Augustine's jus ad bellum, where Catholics are only allowed to fight against unjust attackers, and cannot exceed the minimum force necessary to stop the attack.
Muslims also teach that we should always try to live virtuously, but at the same time Islam admits that we still all sin. So we should minimize our sins as much as possible and do as much good as possible. This is the same as Catholicism. We try to live virtuously like Christ, but as St. Paul says, "There is no one who lives and who does not sin."
To Islam it seems like you're allowed to hurt people because they've been bad to you and with Christianity it's replacing evil with love, hence the love your enemies.
Secondly, I think the doctrine of salvation is different to Muslims and Christians. It's not that they don't believe in being virtuous it's that their good deeds outweigh the bad. For Christians, forgiveness of sins is essential, along with contrition and resolve to live virtuously and do the will of God. We teach that nothing unclean can enter heaven, so one has to become like Christ in all things.
I have just begun reading about some of the basic tenets of Islam; including a book written by Reza Aslan titled "No god but God." It is a fascinating read that goes into the origins and development of Islam throughout history. I'm not sure that many Christians realize the tensions and disagreements even among different Muslim communities.
As a Christian who accepts the claims that Jesus made about himself in the Scripture, I would appreciate hearing how a Muslim understands the gospel message that Christ died for sin and was raised according to the Scripture.
Thank you for your response. I think we can all resonate with feelings of frustration as a result of not being able to overcome sin for good in and of our own strength.
We cannot escape or overcome sin because it is a part of our nature. Our greatest problem lies inside of each and everyone of us. Paul addresses this in Romans 1 when he declared that mankind "exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things." This affront to God is not a new phenomenon in Paul's day, but goes back to the Old Testament ("but my people have exchanged their glorious God for that which does not profit" - Jeremiah 2) and all the way back to Genesis. Rather than be totally satisfied in a full dependency on God, mankind essentially chose to claim the knowledge of good and evil for himself.
Paul reveals the purpose of the Law in Romans 5. God graciously gave the Law to his people to help reveal sin for what it is: a trespass against God. I'm guilty as charged. But the feelings of guilt, shame, and condemnation that result when comparing my sin to God's perfect holiness and righteousness usually lead to more problems. I try to either justify my actions or come up with some type of works-based law-keeping based on my own morals to try and get back in God's good graces. In reality, though, our own righteousness is like filthy rags, according to Scripture.
But where sin runs deep, God's grace goes even deeper. The Psalms refers to God as gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in love. At the same time, He is holy and will eventually judge everyone according to their works. How can we ever be certain that we did enough good things in our lives to outweigh the bad, that we prayed enough, that we helped enough people in need, that we asked for forgiveness with the right heart motivation, etc.?
You mentioned in your post that "God is that easy to forgive", which made me think of the passage in 2 Chronicles 7:14: "if my people who are called by my name humble themselves, and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and heal their land." But Scripture shows that the people of God in fact did not do these things, and it was God who initiated a heart change among Israel, usually through some sort of judgment. This is what makes the gospel so incredibly powerful. The Word became flesh and live among men. Jesus perfectly obeyed the law because he was fully God. He who knew no sin, became sin and absorbed the full force of God's wrath that we deserve. At the same time, he was fully human; tempted just as the first man in the garden, but surrendering to the will of the Father.
It's unfortunate that over time, many religious scholars have separated the Jesus of history from the Christ of faith. The Christian faith rests on a bodily resurrection. Paul, who encountered Jesus on the road to Damascus, tells the Corinthian church in 1 Corinthians 15 that if "Christ has not been raised, (their) faith is in vain, and they are still in their sins." Jesus had to be God to be able to save, and had to be human to stand in our place. The Christian's hope is in the cross and resurrection of Christ. Paul's letters affirm the gospel message; and the radical transformation in his life can only be credited to a powerful encounter with the risen Christ.
islam is the perfected version of other religion.Just wondering if anyone knew...
Does Islam share any stances with Catholicism on morality? If so, what?
I would suggest that no religion is "perfect" because people and their interpretations and their beliefs are not "perfect".islam is the perfected version of other religion.
may i sincerely ask that read this book?I would suggest that no religion is "perfect" because people and their interpretations and their beliefs are not "perfect".
yes. there is no original sin in islam.Oh, so that's only an Islamic belief?
Behold: fresh off the baking tray,Just wondering if anyone knew...
Does Islam share any stances with Catholicism on morality? If so, what?