• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Qur'anic Testimony of a False Prophet

Rahmanite

New Member
The Qur'an states.....

"And if Muhammad had made up about Us some false sayings, We would have seized him by the right hand; then We would have cut him from the aorta."
(Al-Haqqah, 44-46)

...and Bukhari tells us in is Sahih (authentic) hadith:

"Narrated Aisha: The prophet in His ailment in which he died, used to say 'O Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison.'"
(Sahih Bukhari, 5:59:713)

So, what does the Qur'an teach us?

It clearly testifies that if Muhammad attributes lies to Allah, and if he speaks untruths and falsehoods, then Allah shall see to it that Muhammad will die in an excruciating pain that would feel like his aorta has been cut.

Then, guess what happened to Muhammad?

Well, according to one of *the* most reliable hadith collector: Al-Bukhari, that is exactly how Muhammad died: as if his aorta had been cut.

So, in conclusion, we can see that, according to the earliest and most reliable Muslim sources, Muhammad was a false prophet.

There is just no way round this one, my Muslim friends:
If you believe that the Qur'an is the infallible word of God, and if you believe that the sahih hadiths (authentic sayings) contain the true sunnah of Muhammad, his life, and His death, then you have to conclude that Allah fulfilled His promise and saw to it that Muhammad died in agonizing pain because of his false sayings.

Thoughts?
 

interminable

منتظر
I'm a Shia Muslim so I have no any knowledge about the authenticity of that tradition
But according to some Shia scholars the prophet muhammad pbuh was poisoned, not by a jew woman rather by other people and most of them believe he passed away

And that battle was happened at earlier 7 years after hijra and the prophet passed away at 11


So how can possible for God to let prophet live for 4 years after he tells lie and still send his massages to him after revealing that he tells lie????

Besides some traditions say that the prophet befor his death had no clue of illness and suddenly his death happened so we can conclude that that tradition isn't authentic or at least we have some traditions in opposite of that
 
Last edited:

Servant_of_the_One1

Well-Known Member
The follower of falsehood will claim this!

The prophet PBUH didnt die from poison because when the prophet PBUH ate the meat together with two other companions. One of the companions died straight away cuz he had the full poison inside him. The other companion was saved before he could eat a lot.


The prophet PBUH died only after he conveyed the message. Allah swt would never had allowed for His messenger to die before finishing the mission of delivering the message.
 

interminable

منتظر
The follower of falsehood will claim this!

The prophet PBUH didnt die from poison because when the prophet PBUH ate the meat together with two other companions. One of the companions died straight away cuz he had the full poison inside him. The other companion was saved before he could eat a lot.


The prophet PBUH died only after he conveyed the message. Allah swt would never had allowed for His messenger to die before finishing the mission of delivering the message.
I told that
There are some different traditions that have quoted the way of prophet's death and there are some contradictions between them.
So a man should be expert to understand what was happened although finding the truth may is hard in this situation
 

Rahmanite

New Member
The exegesis is as clear as a cloudless, sun scorched summer afternoon.

Who are we to clutch at the straw end of outlandish theories? There are those whose speculative reasoning is rooted in baseless conjectures. Why grasp for alternative meanings when the Qur'an outlines - with exoteric clarity - the penalty for uttering falsehoods in God's name? Why deny the authenticity of a hadith that is indeed authentic (i.e. 'sahih') just because the facts don't sit well?

No amount of convoluted cartwheels of interpretation, nor desperately divergent attempts to tamper with tafsir changes the inherently obvious truth found in the earliest, most reliable Muslim sources.

God saw to it that Muhammad's aorta was cut.

As promised by God.
 
Top